Carbon Uncaptured

 
CCS technology pilot project at Longannet A carbon capture storage pilot project has been running at Longannet

The collapse of the Longannet project in carbon capture and storage leaves some significant gaps and questions.

For instance, if not in Fife, where is it going to work?

And for how much? Perhaps the Scottish Power led business consortium was trying it on, to get more than the £1bn on offer.

The UK government says there were technological obstacles to the carbon capture and storage (CCS) project going further than the £50m design stage - £30m of that paid for by the taxpayer.

But it looks like the main obstacle was the cost of the technology.

Huge benefits

So, does the UK government really know any better what the cost is of a hugely complex new technology? If it's worth spending £1bn to achieve the technology, why is it not worth £1.5bn?

And if the £1bn has not been pauchled by the Treasury - still being available for the next stages of CCS development, we're told - can the government be sure that other projects - perhaps one in Peterhead - can be done within arbitrarily chosen budget ceilings?

This is supposed to be a technology with the potential not only to deliver huge commercial benefits to those who harness it, but also to deliver far larger environmental benefits to everyone.

By removing carbon from fossil-fuel burning, processing, transporting and burying it under the seabed, that could make it possible to rely on coal, gas and oil burning for power.

Wind blown

But if Britain continues to delay, or won't commit the necessary funding, which other countries will take the technological lead?

Hunterston Power Station Questions remain over plans for a new coal-burning plant at Hunterston

We've seen this sort of thing happen before to Britain's renewable energy lead, when it was one of the best at wind power.

Government support was withdrawn as it withdrew from industrial policy in the 1980s. And turbine technology now comes from Denmark, Germany and Spain, with developments also from industrial giants in Japan, China and Korea.

It's not just the current government that's to blame. Labour - including Ed Miliband when he was environment and climate change secretary - spun out the competition for years, setting deadlines that kept slipping and making it unattractive for companies to stay engaged.

Belching in Fife

There's another gap, closer to home. If it's going to prove this difficult or impossibly expensive to make CCS work, what's going to happen to Longannet? And to the plans for a new coal-burning plant at Hunterston?

The huge power station in Fife belches around quarter of Scotland's carbon emissions, it's licensed for another nine years, but what then keeps the lights on?

And how can either the UK or the Scottish government meet their legally-binding emission targets if this technology can't be made to work for the kind of money available?

 
Douglas Fraser Article written by Douglas Fraser Douglas Fraser Business and economy editor, Scotland

Oil's corroding pipeline

These are bumper times for the offshore oil and gas industry. But while there's record investment, costs have been rising at an alarming rate, so there's a warning about future tax take.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 10.

    What happens next? Simple, UK Government will announce in about 3 weeks time that they have reached agreement to finance a Carbon Capture unit at the new power station being built in Kent

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 9.

    5 graham
    I agree regarding the the futility of collecting fines
    - these countries will not pay any fines.
    HOWEVER, if the technology is going to be used in Europe
    I would like Scotland to get a slice of the pie. So far the UK
    government has backed off their promise and pulled the funding
    which would have given Scotland a good start in this area..

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 8.

    #4

    Nobody is suggesting there is no potential for this technology and quite a few companies have already developed solutions. The problem is though that those aren't Scottish nor even from the UK. So we're already well behind the curve.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 7.

    A good decision to pull out of this project. If £1bn can't buy an industrial scale installation, the technology can't be viable. The power company bean counters must think this, or they'd back the idea with their own cash. Another flaw with CCS is knowing it's working. If they were just to bypass the expensive capture process would we ever know? And alternatives? The Pentland Firth tides.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 6.

    A good decision to pull out of this project. If £1bn can't buy an industrial scale installation, the technology can't be viable. The power company bean counters must think this, or they'd back the idea with their own cash. Another flaw with CCS is knowing it's working. If they were just to bypass the expensive capture process would we ever know? And alternatives? The Pentland Firth tides.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 5.

    #4 10 million fine against 100's of billion of new systems? Who will enforce the fines - the world carbon police? Get real we and other Europeans are the only ones doing anything about this. Africa, South America, Asia and the USA give it lip service only. Complete nonsense, fabricated by loony environmentalists, that will only bring down industry and standards of living in Europe

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 4.

    Some comments here seem to forget the very important fact that in a few years time when carbon emission tax comes into full force, we are going to be paying out millions in fines. China and India will be paying out even more and they will be looking for a quick reliable fix.

    No potential in this technology ? Rubbish.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 3.

    Whilst it would be good to have jobs from this technology a real look at the myths of the climate cooling - warming - change predictions would probably show that we are wasting time and money on technology that could never be sold to the new big markets,and indeed old markets. The Indians, Chinese and Americans could not care less about carbon emissions. Only bankrupt Europe do anything about it.

  • Comment number 2.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    People really need to understand that we are in fact already too late. If we really wanted to become world leaders in this technology then we would have been been working on it for at least the last ten years and would have already built small scale systems. This is what has happened elsewhere which is why the carbon capture kit would be supplied by a Norwegian outfit not a Scottish or UK one.

 

Page 2 of 2

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.