Cycling Scotland advert banned over 'no helmet'

 

The ASA said showing a rider without a helmet could encourage behaviour "prejudicial to health and safety"

Related Stories

A television advert promoting safe cycling has been banned for showing a rider without a helmet.

The advert, part of a campaign by Cycling Scotland, seeks to encourage drivers to give cyclists the same space and care as they would give a horse.

But the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said it should not be shown on TV again as not wearing a helmet was "socially irresponsible".

Cycling Scotland said wearing a helmet was not a legal requirement.

The national cycle promotion organisation for Scotland told the ASA wearing a helmet was a personal choice for the individual - a fact it considered was reflected in the advert with footage of various cyclists both with, and without, helmets.

Cycling Scotland also referred to its helmet policy, which discussed the possible undesired outcomes of wearing helmets, including limiting uptake of cycling and "influencing a driver's behaviour to be less careful when interacting on the road".

still from advert Some of the cyclists in the advert were wearing helmets

A further complaint that the cyclist was riding too far from the kerb was also dismissed by Cycling Scotland.

It said that given the width of the road featured in the advert, the cyclist was safer riding out past the area where cars would be parked so they could be clearly visible to other road users.

It told the ASA the shoot for the advert was supervised by one of its most experienced cycling instructors.

The ASA, which received complaints from five viewers, acknowledged the advert was primarily aiming to encourage motorists to take care when driving near cyclists.

'Socially irresponsible'

It noted that the cyclist in the final scene was not wearing a helmet or any other safety attire and appeared to be more than half a metre from the parking lane.

It said: "We understood that UK law did not require cyclists to wear helmets or cycle at least 0.5 metres from the kerb.

"However, under the Highway Code it was recommended as good practice for cyclists to wear helmets. Therefore, we considered that the scene featuring the cyclist on a road without wearing a helmet undermined the recommendations set out in the Highway Code.

"Furthermore, we were concerned that whilst the cyclist was more than 0.5 metres from the kerb, they appeared to be located more in the centre of the lane when the car behind overtook them and the car almost had to enter the right lane of traffic.

"Therefore, for those reasons we concluded the ad was socially irresponsible and likely to condone or encourage behaviour prejudicial to health and safety."

It ruled that the advert must not be broadcast again in its current form.

Cycling Scotland was told that any future adverts featuring cyclists should be shown wearing helmets and placed in the most suitable cycling position.

A statement issued by Cycling Scotland said it was "disappointed" with the adjudication of the ASA that future ads should always feature cyclists wearing helmets.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +123

    Comment number 31.

    "we were concerned that whilst the cyclist was more than 0.5 metres from the kerb, they appeared to be located more in the centre of the lane when the car behind overtook them and the car almost had to enter the right lane of traffic."
    ---
    Err, Ninety nine percent of overtaking involves crossing the centre of the carriageway. If you haven't mastered this simple skill you shouldn't be driving..

  • rate this
    +111

    Comment number 12.

    So they've banned an advert... not for promoting hate speech... or for inciting violence... but because a cyclist was not wearing a helmet... which is not even a legal requirement in the UK... Classic...

  • rate this
    +104

    Comment number 10.

    Absolutely ridiculous decision. There is no legal obligation for cyclists to wear helmets and inconclusive research about their effectiveness. Cyclists are entitled to position themselves in the road where they can be seen and where they can avoid obstructions. The highway code even includes a picture of a car crossing the centre line overtaking a cyclist!

  • rate this
    +93

    Comment number 34.

    This is a ridiculous decision by the ASA and obviously they have no idea about road safety or in fact the law?!
    Heaven forbid that a car should have to move a safe distance from a cyclist when overtaking, its not like he wouldnt have to do it if he was overtaking a car!
    her positioning is fine & the full ad shows that shes avoiding potholes! http://tinyurl.com/ljnfxyt

  • rate this
    +91

    Comment number 53.

    Interesting how many people think it's wrong for a cyclist to be positioned anywhere other than in the gutter of the road. A bicycle is a vehicle, just the same as a car, and there is no requirement for them to cycle in any particular part of the road. Being smaller and slower than a car does not give you fewer rights on the road.

 

Comments 5 of 811

 

More Scotland stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.