Scottish government seeks minimum alcohol price of 50p per unit

 

Nicola Sturgeon: "This is a big policy designed to address a big problem"

Related Stories

The Scottish government has confirmed that it wants to set a minimum price for alcohol of 50p per unit.

The figure - 5p higher than the one which had been proposed in the previous parliament - comes as a 40p price is planned for England and Wales.

The Scottish Nationalists hope the measure will reduce the health problems caused by excessive drinking.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon made the announcement during a visit to Glasgow Royal Infirmary.

It is hoped the move - which would make the ­cheapest bottle of wine £4.69, while a four-pack of lager would cost at least £3.52 - will lead to a reduction in hospital admissions and deaths through alcohol abuse.

Ms Sturgeon said: "Too many Scots are drinking themselves to death. The problem affects people of all walks of life.

Benefits of policy

After one year After 10 years

Source: Sheffield University's alcohol research group

60 fewer deaths

More than 300 fewer deaths annually

1,600 fewer hospital admissions

6,500 fewer hospital admissions

A total value of harm reduction of £64m

A cumulative value of harm reduction of £942m

"It's no coincidence that as affordability has increased, alcohol-related hospital admissions have quadrupled, and it is shocking that half of our prisoners now say they were drunk when they committed the offence. It's time for this to stop.

"Introducing a minimum price per unit will enable us to tackle these problems, given the clear link between affordability and consumption.

"There is now a groundswell of support for the policy across the medical profession, police forces, alcohol charities and from significant parts of the drinks and licensed trade industry who recognise the benefits minimum pricing can bring - saving lives and reducing crime."

Sheffield University's alcohol research group was commissioned by the Scottish government to examine the impact of the policy.

Dr John Holmes, who was part of the project team, told BBC Radio Scotland the move would have a significant impact on drinking habits.

He said: "We found that a 50p minimum price would lead to an overall reduction in consumption of 5.5%. So harmful drinkers' consumption would fall by more than 10%, whereas moderate drinkers would see their consumption fall by just 2.5%.

"In terms of how much extra spending that would mean, harmful drinkers would have to spend over £120 extra a year on their alcohol, whereas moderate drinkers would spend just £8 a year more."

Start Quote

To the politics then. Is there any substance to the often-voiced complaint that Labour is only opposing this scheme because it was dreamed up by the SNP? Because they want to deny the Nationalists their "smoking ban" moment. ”

End Quote

The Alcohol Minimum Pricing Bill is making its second passage through parliament after defeat in 2010 when the SNP was in a minority administration.

It passed through parliament without opposition in March.

Ms Sturgeon promised to announce what the minimum price per unit would be before Holyrood's final vote on the legislation later in this parliament.

The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats supported the legislation, while Labour abstained.

The law will be ditched after six years if the policy does not work after a "sunset clause" was inserted as part of a deal to secure Conservative support for the SNP proposals.

Scottish Labour said it had been prepared to support the policy if the SNP government clawed back the "multi-million pound windfall the policy generates".

The party is worried that the minimum price would generate profits for alcohol retailers in excess of £125m.

People in Glasgow respond to the plan to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol

Its public health spokesman Dr Richard Simpson said: "By setting a minimum price of 50p, it will mean even bigger profits for the big alcohol retailers and not a single extra penny going towards our police or health services that are left to mop up the consequences of alcohol misuse.

"The need to claw back the multi-million windfall is now even more urgent, especially at a time when budgets across the public sector are tight and the SNP is already cutting the alcohol treatment budget by millions of pounds."

'Give it a chance'

But Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw was critical of Labour for not giving its full backing.

He said: "Minimum pricing will have all the more authority if it commands all party support.

"Given that Scottish Conservatives have secured a 'sunset clause' there is no excuse for Labour remaining isolated. However sceptical, all parties should now unite to give minimum pricing a chance to succeed."

Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie welcomed the price move.

He said: "A higher than expected price should have an even more significant impact on alcohol misuse that blights lives, communities and families. The SNP can count on the support of the Liberal Democrats for minimum pricing."

The Scottish Licensed Trade Association (SLTA) also welcomed the Scottish government's announcement.

Its chief executive Paul Waterson said: "The whole issue of introducing retail price controls for the sale of alcohol is a brave step by the Scottish government and one that the SLTA supports and has campaigned for since the 1970s, when retail price maintenance was abolished.

"The 50p per unit minimum price is an appropriate starting point which is fair and 'proportionate' to help combat the low cost sales of alcohol we see around us every day, which contribute to the abuse of alcohol problems within Scotland."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +28

    Comment number 59.

    Does the Edinburgh Parliament have cheap boozing for members like the Westminster Parliament?

  • rate this
    +14

    Comment number 58.

    I voted yes for devolution to stop these stupid laws being trialled on the Scots first, but devolution has produced exactly the opposite effect. There are laws in place to combat excessive drinking, but they're just not enforced adequately. More nanny state nonsense from our overseers.

  • rate this
    +41

    Comment number 57.

    Price has nothing to do with consumption. On the continent wine and beer (of high quality) is cheap, there is no binge-vomiting-in-street etc. History tells us the Uk has always been binge-drinking, just look at a Hogarth painting. Order a Prosecco in Italy and you get free canapes to slowly fill your stomach. Order it here and you get a pushy waiter offering you 20 for the price 1 (AND NO FOOD)

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 56.

    How can this possibly work, with companies selling thru mail order does this mean that my box of wine will cost more than one south of the border? As per usual, the SNP are a man with a hammer, and to them everything looks like a nail.
    On the plus side, maybe the Rosyth ferry may restart due to a demand from the booze cruisers

  • rate this
    +13

    Comment number 55.

    There's an old joke that goes
    An Englishman drinks until they're drunk.
    An Irishman drinks until they have no money.
    A Scotsman drinks until no-one else has any money...

  • rate this
    +13

    Comment number 54.

    43. "Sensible drinkers have to suffer because of the idiotic minority.
    Easier solution – raise the legal drinking age to 25 or 30."

    A lot of under-25s are sensible drinkers too. It does seem odd that a small price-increase on over-30s is the nanny state but banning a whole section of society from drinking for the actions of a minority of them isn't.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 53.

    Another ill thought out policy. Wait to see the massive increase in "home brewed" beer, wine and even spirits and then watch the hospital admissions rise further.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 52.

    38.Rufus McDufus
    "Err, I think you're confusing tories & socialists."
    ----------------------------
    "sunset clause" was inserted as part of a deal to secure Conservative support for the SNP proposals."

    Umm no im not.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 51.

    IMO,do gooders banned smokers from inside pubs and because it's cheaper to drink at home,that's what they now do so loads of revenue has been lost along with loads of jobs.
    So...this washout idea of setting the minimum price of alcohol is a waste of time.
    I mean who says "the yobs that are binge drinking are poor" ?
    Dont acoholics get state monies to feed their habits anyway?

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 50.

    This has been held back for a long time thanks to the useless labour party whose policies are to oppose anything suggested by the SNP. Cheap lager and ciders are harmful chemical cocktails. Putting the prices up may help to wean the binge drinkers off this junk. Its certainly worth a try and an ongoing review will monitor to see if it works. Who could possibly object?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 49.

    just another way of hitting those with a tight budget.

    students and you people can barely afford the essentials due to a shortage of jobs and high price of living. Even the luxury of a car for young people living in rural places like my self is being denied due to the ridiculous price of petrol and insurance.

    now we cant even rely on a cheap bottle of cider at the weekend

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 48.

    Why not actually explain how to work out units from ABV and the size of the drink? It is less confusing than claiming a minimum price for an unspecified size of can of beer of an unspecified strength. Calculating units is not difficult - isn't it a good idea for a public service broadcaster to educate the public about it?

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 47.

    21. Some Lingering Fog
    'Alcohol is a luxury not an essential.'
    ///
    Sassenach!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 46.

    This proposal is fundamentally flawed as it will do nothing to increase the price of one notorious 'tonic wine', which has been implicated by the in numerous crimes and anti-social behaviour across Scotland. It is already more than 50p per unit.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 45.

    There is already a huge market in illegal alcohol and some of it is poisonous.
    All this is going to do is make more money for organised crime and tip more law obiding citizens over the edge.
    It makes you question who is behind these crime syndicates.

  • rate this
    +27

    Comment number 44.

    OK time for some facts: moderate drinkers will only be slightly affected as they a) don't drink much and b) don't tend to buy cheap booze. They do however contribute to the billions spent cleaning up the mess. Yes culture needs to change but price is part of that - cheap alcohol in recent decades has been the root cause of many of our problems. Fact.

  • rate this
    -6

    Comment number 43.

    Sensible drinkers have to suffer because of the idiotic minority.
    Easier solution – raise the legal drinking age to 25 or 30.
    Impose massive penalties on drunks, under age and people who sell / supply to under age
    Knee jerk reaction again from dopey politicians

  • rate this
    +200

    Comment number 42.

    I'm sure there will be a reduction in consumption but not by the target drinkers. The reduction will come from pensioners like ourselves no longer being able to afford our two bottles of wine a week.

    Stop mollycoddling these binge drinking fools and start enforcing the existing licensing and drunk and disorderly laws. Don't make us all suffer for the stupidity of the few.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 41.

    I do not drink,but don't governments learn from history, prohibition in any form does not work, in these difficult times
    expect increased crime not reduced

  • Comment number 40.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

 

Page 53 of 55

 

More Scotland stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.