Call for pre-watershed ban on junk food advertising
Research found children were still exposed to adverts for foods high in fat, salt or sugar
Television adverts for food high in fat, sugar and salt should not be shown before the 9pm watershed, according to Scotland's public health minister.
Michael Matheson has written to UK Health Secretary Andrew Lansley asking if he would support a UK-wide ban.
It follows recent research which suggests children are still exposed to the same level of junk food advertising despite tighter regulations.
Health groups say further action is needed to tackle the problem.
Broadcasting regulator Ofcom brought in a ban on advertising foods high in fat, salt or sugar during children's programming.
But a study by academics at Newcastle University found 6.1% of adverts seen by youngsters were about junk food before the ban, with the figure at 7% after the ban.
They said young people do not just watch children's programmes, to which the rules apply.
Mr Matheson now wants the regulations to go further.
“Start Quote
End Quote Dr Sally Winning BMA ScotlandThe media has an important role to play in forming attitudes to nutrition”
He said: "According to the UN and Ofcom studies, the restrictions brought in by Ofcom have been adhered to by children's channels and broadcasters showing programmes specifically aimed at children.
"However, a loophole exists that allows HFSS (high in fat, sugar and salt) food adverts to feature during programmes with a high child audience such as soaps and talent shows.
"That's why we want to introduce a pre-watershed ban and are looking to the UK government to support such a move which would carry the additional benefit of encouraging our partners in the food industry to reformulate their produce to lower salt, fat and sugar content."
Scotland's public health minister said such a move would require "co-operation" between the UK and Scottish governments.
He added: "Broadcast advertising influences the choices made by children and can shape their attitudes to food as they grow into adulthood.
"Tackling obesity and encouraging people to make healthier life choices is one of the most important things we can do to improve the health of our nation."
Further considerationJane Landon, deputy chief executive of the National Heart Forum, welcomed the call for a pre-watershed ban.
She said: "The existing rules have delivered protections in principle but not in practice."
Dr Sally Winning, deputy chairman of the British Medical Association Scotland, said: "The media has an important role to play in forming attitudes to nutrition and there is scope to harness this potential and further regulate its more harmful impact.
"Whilst the advertising of unhealthy foodstuffs, including inappropriate sponsorship of programmes and events targeted at school children, is already regulated, it should be noted that many of the TV programmes most watched by children are not children's programmes, and so further consideration must be given to addressing this."
Scottish Labour's health spokeswoman Jackie Baillie accused the SNP of "picking a fight" with Westminster.
She said: "At a time when we have lost 2,000 nurses, our hospitals are crumbling and we don't have enough blankets for elderly patients, I am amazed that the SNP government is picking a fight with the UK government about what time we can show McDonald's adverts on television.
"This is the same government which rejected my colleague Richard Simpson's Trans-fats Bill, something they did have the power to do.
"The SNP's obsession with constitutional politics knows no bounds and is distracting from the real problems in our health service."
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~42~RS~)


Wealthy '273-times richer than poor'
Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Disaster on ice
Renegade reporter
Bad tip?
Ye gods
On the move in Mumbai
Comment number 298.
fear of a slack planet18th March 2012 - 13:40
as a medical doctor, I see lots of obese children in my clinics who have multiple health problems that may kill them before they turn 50yrs. I don't suggest creating a nancy state but its different for kids- they don't understand the long term health consequences and we should steer in the correct direction until they're old enough to understand. The kids I see in clinics never had a proper chance
Link to this (Comment number 298)
Comment number 246.
behindthe frogs18th March 2012 - 11:24
My grandchildren are rarely exposed to TV and these ads. It is interesting when out with them their choice is completely different from their friends who are obviously influenced the ads. Bring it on as soon as possible.
Link to this (Comment number 246)
Comment number 166.
D18th March 2012 - 9:26
How will they define "junk food". There is no such thing as junk food, just a junk diet. Nothing wrong with burgers, kebabs, pizzas, etc occasionally. The problem is if they form the bulk of your diet. I don't see any adverts encouraging sensible diets, but if there were, you would all complain about the nanny state! Parents need to take charge of what their children watch and eat.
Link to this (Comment number 166)
Comment number 97.
joshal118th March 2012 - 7:30
Right now I'm in Middle East. I am doing a project about junk food. I think junk food advertising shouldn't be banned. If junk food adverts were banned, children wouldn't know what's the different between junk food and healthy food. They should be educated about a balanced diet. Besides, children are old enough to decide whether junk food is good or not.
Link to this (Comment number 97)
Comment number 73.
Tracey B18th March 2012 - 5:19
The ads won't work as most parents want an easy life and give in to whining kids. I have no trouble whatsoever with my three kids, as we don't shop at supermarkets, we do local butchers, bakers, greengrocers etc. so much cheaper as your not tempted by supposed offers on junk that passes for food. As for fast food, the occasional treat once a fortnight to the local fish/chip shop suffices.
Link to this (Comment number 73)
Comments 5 of 12