Labour Party reforms could see unions and MPs lose say


Ed Miliband: "Giving ordinary people a say in our party"

Related Stories

Trade unions, MPs and MEPs are to have their influence over Labour leadership elections reduced under plans announced by Ed Miliband.

It is part of the Labour leader's proposed shake-up of the party's historic relationship with the trade unions.

Mr Miliband said future leadership contests would be decided by a one member, one vote election.

He described the changes as some of the biggest in the party's history.

However, Conservative Party Chairman Grant Shapps said the changes would make it "even easier" for the "union barons" to pick the Labour leader in future.

'Cash shortage'

The Labour leader embarked on reforming the union link after a selection row in Falkirk last year when allegations of vote-rigging surfaced involving the Unite union.

No wrongdoing has been found to have taken place.

Mr Miliband said: "My reforms are about giving people from all walks of life a bigger say in the Labour Party so we can better tackle the issues that matter to them, like the cost of living crisis.

"Above all, I'm determined to change my party so we can change the country.

"This is about extending the principle of one member, one vote, the right principle for the 21st Century," he added.

"It's about saying we want to hear the voices of ordinary people, construction workers, shop workers, people from all walks of life."

He said there would be "financial consequences" for the party if the reforms went ahead.

"But when it's the right thing to do you should do it, and that's my principle," he added.

Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps: "I do not think it is right to have trade union barons deciding policy"

"This is about my determination to make big change in our party and if you look at what Neil Kinnock, John Smith, Tony Blair, all of them wanted to extend this principle of one member, one vote."

Mr Miliband said the plans were about "a relationship more with individual trade unionists and less about the relationship with trade union leaders".

"Of course it's the case that trade unions themselves will continue to affiliate to the Labour Party, but it's about saying in the 21st Century, we do want to hear the voices of individuals."

Currently - under Labour's electoral college system - MPs and MEPs get a third of the votes to select a new leader, trade unions get a third and party members another third.

That system is to be abolished with every party member and those union members who donate to the party having an equal say.

Under Labour's plans, from the end of 2014 new members of unions affiliated to the party would have to opt in and pay a £3 fee to Labour before they got a vote.

This process would be phased in over five years for existing union members.

MPs would retain the sole right to nominate leadership candidates.

The threshold those candidates would need is also to be raised - possibly to 20% of Labour's MPs.

'Massive change'

The key changes

A new method of electing Labour's leader - the electoral college, which gives unions, party members and MPs/MEPs a third of the votes each, abolished in favour of one member, one vote

MPs have sole nomination rights for leadership candidates and those candidates will need a higher level of support than at present - possibly 20% of MPs

All union members will have to 'double opt-in' if they want to take part in a leadership contest. They have to say that they are content to give money to Labour AND that they want to become 'an affiliated supporter'

Only full party members - not trade-union 'affiliated supporters' - will choose parliamentary and council candidates

Changes to London mayoral selection - Labour's candidate to be selected in the same way as the party leader

New leadership rules will be put in place this year - but changes to the party's funding will be phased in over five years

At present, trade union members pay a levy to the party - decided by the union - unless they opt out.

Describing the changes as "massive", Mr Miliband acknowledged they could mean donations to the party falling.

"I make no apology for making sure the party is financially secure, so these reforms are being phased over a five-year timescale."

In another mooted change, registered supporters - those who have registered their support but are not full party members - would be entitled to vote in leadership and mayoral elections "for a small fee".

There are currently around 20,000 such supporters and the party hopes to boost that number - partly as a counterweight to the votes of trade unionists, BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said.

Mr Miliband sought to reassure his parliamentary party, telling the Guardian newspaper: "They will continue to play an important role with their right to nominate, so it will be MPs that will decide who goes forward to the election in the country on the principle of one member one vote."

The BBC also understands that unions will retain 50% of the votes at the party's conference.

Veteran Labour MP Alan Johnson said he had been arguing for the changes since his time as Communication Workers Union general secretary.

"This is absolutely the right way to go," he told BBC News.

"We have a genuine one member, one vote system to elect our leader."

But the party's Glasgow South West MP Ian Davidson said: "There's been nobody in my constituency coming along and saying to me at this time of economic crisis, what we need is a reorganisation of the Labour Party."

'Same old Labour'

Conservative party chairman Mr Shapps, however, suggested union members could outnumber ordinary members by 10 to one under the proposed changes.

He said: "Ed Miliband promised to loosen the trade union barons' grip on the Labour Party. But he has been too weak to deliver.

"Until now, the union barons could buy Labour's policies and pick Labour's leader. After these changes, it will be even easier for the union barons to buy Labour's policies and even easier to pick the leader."

He added: "Ed Miliband has shown he's too weak to stand up to the union barons who own him, too weak to stand up for hardworking people and too weak to offer a long-term economic plan to secure Britain's future."


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 624.

    Does this mean the tories are going to distance themselves from their payrollers the bankers? No, I thought not

  • rate this

    Comment number 623.

    I have never voted Labour and, God help me, never will. I cannot, in all good conscience, vote for a party that is just a mouthpiece for trade union criminals and Marxists (yes, Mr McCluskey, I'm looking at you).

    Anything but Labour.

  • rate this

    Comment number 622.

    This is what is happening here....

    Union members vote you down
    Individuals (thinkers) vote you up

    I jest (sort of). Seriously, my comment me down - tell me why...convince me I'm wrong....go on...

  • rate this

    Comment number 621.

    Just what will these people do to get into power?

    First Blair turns the party into Thatcher's legacy.

    Now Milliband wants to turn what's left into a pure and simple Murdoch led populist vote machine.

    With no body to stop them. No curbs.

    No need for a voter base. No policies. Simply add votes.

    Courtesy of Murdoch's press and media empire.

  • rate this

    Comment number 620.

    I would think when the small print is read in detail, the unions will in fact have a lot more influence than now.

    Labour can't afford to distance themselves from the unions, unless they pass party funding on to the taxpayer.

  • rate this

    Comment number 619.


    Actually benefit sanctions tend to hinder trying to find jobs. Not motivate people into finding them.

    That's beside the point though, I would think creating more jobs, bringing back industry into this country would be a better election promise. Still I can't really tell the difference anymore between the big three parties.

    Shame there's no option of 'none of the above'

  • rate this

    Comment number 618.

    Labour are trying to reach more into the middle England territory by making this move. If this goes through then they will claim to be the party of all but the rich. They are no longer the party of the working class man, they are desperately trying to become more middle ground which is difficult when they position themselves against business & people with aspirations.

  • rate this

    Comment number 617.

    As a retired worker who worked as a fitter welder for 45 years and a shop steward for at least 11 years,I hated the fact that some of my money went to the labour party,I and a sizeable minority did not and would not support the labour party.My job was to look after the interests of the workers at my factory, but to make sure this was not at the expense of the factories well being.So I am pleased.

  • rate this

    Comment number 616.

    "MPs would retain the sole right to nominate leadership candidates.
    The threshold those candidates would need is also to be raised - possibly to 20% of Labour's MPs"

    In other words we have the pretence of greater democracy but instead get more centralised control. The chances of a "maverick" candidate who speaks his mind and is popular with the electorate are even further reduced.

  • rate this

    Comment number 615.

    Ed Milliband now "scorning the ladder by which he did ascend"
    Shakespeare was so wise.

  • rate this

    Comment number 614.

    Labour need to do this as their main opponents, The Conservatives, are not influenced by any vested interest groups with their funding.

    LOL - This is a joke of course.....?

  • Comment number 613.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 612.

    There is no escape from the corporate servitude relentlessly foisted upon us by elite politicians who pretend to oppose each other. The country is crying out for a new, honest system in which the people are sovereign. Visit LeftUnity for some refreshing ideas.

  • rate this

    Comment number 611.

    Just got my big drum mended and singing that old Labour favourite " Tell me the old old story " what a load of old tosh ! Since when has Milliband and his mob know anything about the working classes ! He's on the way out the door along with Cameron and hopefully CLEGG !

  • rate this

    Comment number 610.

    Labour funded by unions, Tories by big business They don't fund you because they like you, they fund you for influence...remove external funding let the tax payer fund them for a fixed amount and its a crime to spend more....Tax payers fund them anyway because who ever gets in you do pay for it one way or the other

  • Comment number 609.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 608.

    Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha . Where are my tablets, please, love ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 607.

    Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps: "I do not think it is right to have trade union barons deciding policy"

    so does he think it's right to have business barons deciding policy?

    pot and kettle.

  • rate this

    Comment number 606.

    Isn't it awful voting is such a dilemma now. You have the Tories, greedy and just look out for the rich. Lib-dems, well same as the tories as we now know. Labour, well what their about i no longer know and i'm not sure they do either.

    Seriously what do you do? Vote for the one who tells the least lies.

  • rate this

    Comment number 605.

    I don,t trust any politician these days, and have lost all faith in any of them. I mistrust them, don,t like them don,t, believe them. They are not honorable as the old statesmen of yesteryear, who stood down at any inkling of Hypocrisy, are wrong doing. Those where the one,s I fought for all those years ago. If the people don,t trust the government, then that government should stand down.


Page 6 of 37


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.