MPs reject Tory rebels' immigration amendment

 
Border control at Edinburgh Airport - 10 February 2014

Related Stories

MPs have voted to reject a bid by nearly 100 rebel Tory MPs to stop foreign criminals using European human rights law to avoid deportation.

But MPs did vote in favour of Home Secretary Theresa May's plan to strip foreign-born terror suspects of UK citizenship, by 297 to 34.

The rebel plan only failed thanks to opposition from Labour and Lib Dem MPs.

No 10 - anticipating a big rebellion - had ordered Tory ministers to abstain rather than oppose the backbenchers.

If, as had been expected at one stage, Labour MPs had also abstained, the rebel amendment would have succeeded. In the event it was defeated by 241 to 97.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said David Cameron had "simply ordered his troops to retreat in the face of embarrassment" and the episode illustrated the difficulty the prime minister had with controlling his own backbenchers.

Dominic Raab - the Tory MP behind the amendment - told MPs it was time the law was changed so foreign criminals could no longer use Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - a right to a family life - to escape deportation.

'Scared'

There was confusion in the Commons as Mrs May sought to attack Mr Raab's amendment just as Downing Street was announcing that ministers were to abstain in the vote.

She told MPs the amendment was "incompatible" with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper accused the home secretary of being "scared of her own backbenchers", adding that the Immigration Bill has been a "car crash" for the government.

She told Mrs May: "We know you opposed the amendment, because if you supported it you could have voted for it and it would have gone through.

"But you didn't. You sat on your hands because you were scared. What kind of home secretary is that? What kind of government is this?"

In a statement, UKIP's head of policy Tim Aker said Mr Cameron had "lost the plot", adding the only solution was to "leave the EU and leave the ECHR to take back control of these legal issues".

Downing Street said that Mr Cameron agreed with the aims of the rebels, but had told ministers to abstain because of fears that the actual measure being proposed could be illegal.

Mrs May had been accused of trying to buy off rebels keen to see a tougher line on immigration with her plan to strip some foreign-born terror suspects of their citizenship even if it left them stateless.

But she insisted it had been planned for some time - a point confirmed by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, who said the move was "justifiable".

'Limited circumstances'

She also hit back at claims by Lib Dem MP Sarah Teather that she was seeking a "blank cheque" to rob citizens of their rights, arguing that home secretaries would be able to render someone stateless only in "very, very specific and limited circumstances" and in strict accordance with the UK's international obligations.

It would not apply to British citizens but could see foreigners who have become naturalised citizens whose conduct is deemed "seriously prejudicial" lose their nationality. People with dual nationality can already lose their British passports.

The main thrust of the Immigration Bill is being supported by Labour and other parties in the Commons.

The new legislation would:

  • Allow foreign criminals to be deported before the outcome of their appeal is known, as long as they do not face "serious irreversible harm" at home
  • Cut the number of grounds for appeal against deportation from 17 to four
  • Compel landlords to check whether tenants are in the UK illegally, with those failing to do so facing large fines
  • Force banks to check immigrants' legal status before offering accounts
  • Make some temporary migrants - such as students - pay a £200-a-year levy towards the cost of NHS services.
 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +155

    Comment number 649.

    All this talk of the human rights of criminals. What about the human rights of their victims-that should be paramount.

  • rate this
    +78

    Comment number 585.

    "Suspect" implies a lack of proof, which sets a very dangerous precedent. However, if they are conclusively linked to terrorist organisations then they should lose their citizenship.

  • rate this
    +241

    Comment number 357.

    I worked in Gulf for many years and I thought they had the right attitude towards 'illegals' and foreigners who break the law. Straight to the airport and on a plane home. Oh, and try the old 'l have no passport or papers' ploy to avoid deportation and see what happens.

    As a foreigner I had no problem accepting that if I broke their laws that's what would happen - their country, their laws.

  • rate this
    -141

    Comment number 107.

    No doubt this won't be a popular view, but to me the human rights act is about protecting all humans, not just those we chose to like.

  • rate this
    +275

    Comment number 94.

    Why is there even any debate on this? It should absolutely go without saying that migrant criminals (at least violent ones) should have their deportation rights curbed or removed completely. Why would anyone have any problem with this unless they're just so blinded by ideology that they can't think clearly?

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.