Government in 'turmoil' over implementing flood precaution rules

 

Aerial footage of flooding in the Thames Valley area on Friday

Related Stories

The government is in "turmoil" over the implementation of rules to prevent housing developments making floods worse, building industry sources say.

A deal has been reached on the long-standing question of how drainage features should be maintained, but the policy remains postponed indefinitely.

One industry source told BBC News civil service cuts had left ministers "incapable" of implementing the policy.

Ministers said reducing the impact of flooding was a key priority.

As an island nation on the wrong end of a weather conveyor belt delivering storm systems across the Atlantic, huge waves and relentless rain should not surprise us.

What is unusual is how the country has been hit for so long, for so hard, and on so many fronts at the same time. Vast waves pounding the coast represent one kind of threat, the barrages of rainfall swelling the rivers inland are another.

Even now the Thames is flowing at an astonishing rate, carrying 400 tonnes of water through Surrey every single second - 10 times more than normal for the time of year and the equivalent of 10 huge articulated lorries rushing past every second.

The thousands of miles of sea and river defences have rarely been so tested. I'll be exploring how well they have performed and what more needs to be done in a BBC News special, Battered Britain, on BBC One at 19:30 GMT on 10 January.

Indefinitely postponed

A deal has been struck between the government, councils and builders in England and Wales which will make councils responsible for maintaining drainage features, such as ponds and grassy areas located to catch water running off roofs.

Councils will be able to bill owners of new homes for maintenance.

The councils argue this is fair as owners of existing homes have to have their run-off water treated by water firms through the sewerage system.

But despite the deal, which has taken four years to achieve, the government has indefinitely postponed plans to introduce the new measures from April to allow time for further talks on details.

A Home Builders Federation spokesman said: "After all the work we have done with the government, we are disappointed about the delay to set up the processes for the adoption of the [drainage systems].

"House builders are seeking certainty over the systems they will be required to install and the processes for having them approved."

All political parties describe the discussions as "extremely sensitive", while some participants have privately described extreme frustration that it is taking so long.

One home building industry spokesman, who wanted to remain anonymous, told the BBC: "The turmoil in the government is totally unbelievable. The cuts at the department are clearly a factor. This policy goes round and round - it needs to be sorted out so we can know what sort of developments to plan."

The park in Sheffield that is also a "smart drainage system"

The Flood Act of 2010 obliges builders to landscape developments so that water from roofs and driveways seeps into open ground, rather than rushing into the water system.

But detailed policy on how the features will be cared for has been paralysed, with £500m worth of spending cuts at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) causing regular reshuffles of staff, and leaving key players unable to agree on how the schemes should be built.

Technical experts say the green drainage measures should generally be cheaper than running the water into the sewers, but house builders want flexibility.

David Cameron: "We are doing everything we can"

They say if they have to create ponds on all new developments it may put up the cost of housing.

John Stewart, from the Home Builders Federation, told BBC News: "If you are forced to put in a large pond, that means you can't build homes on that, so there is a cost involved."

Builders want to be able to catch run-off water in giant underground tanks.

Technical experts say this is a poor solution compared with surface features, adding that green drainage measures are typically cheaper than carrying water away in a pipe.

Paul Shaffer from Susdrain - the community for sustainable drainage, based at the construction research institute CIRIA - said: "There are much greater benefits if you capture water on the surface.

"It's a simpler solution that's easier to maintain; you get pollutants broken down free of charge by vegetation, you get amenity value that improves people's quality of lives, you help to improve biodiversity, you also get the benefit that in heatwaves the open areas of water help to cool down the surrounding land."

Sustainable drainage features
sustainable_drainage

One scheme I visited in Sheffield takes the run-off water from a housing estate, breaks up the flow through a pile of rocks and allows the water to soak away. A nearby pond designed to hold run-off water hosts ducks, a heron and dragonflies, which local people appreciate.

The row over technical standards and who pays for maintenance has delayed the rules' publication several times, and MPs on the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee have urged ministers to find a solution.

Defra planned to introduce the rules in April, but this week acknowledged the delayed deadline would be put back further.

'Lobbying furiously'

Observers have also expressed dismay that the disputes are rumbling on.

Richard Ashley, Sheffield University's professor of urban water, said: "It is ridiculous. The government is ideologically in favour of deregulation but it's supposed to be introducing this complicated piece of legislation with a demoralised department with civil servants that keep changing.

"The housebuilders are lobbying furiously behind the scenes."

Local Government Association spokesman Mike Jones told BBC News: "The developers should be able to pay for the works that are needed. They are making very healthy profits."

He added it was "appropriate" that people pay for their drainage.

A Defra spokesman said: "We are committed to introducing sustainable drainage systems (suds) to help reduce the risk of floods from new developments.

"Suds are usually cheaper to maintain than conventional drainage, and we will be consulting soon on how they will be maintained by local authorities."

He denied job losses had contributed to policy delays.

Shadow environment secretary Maria Eagle MP said it was "ridiculous" the matter had been allowed to "drag on for so long".

Meanwhile, the prime minister said on a visit to flood-hit areas in his Oxford constituency that the government was doing everything it could to help people affected by recent floods.

David Cameron also insisted the Environment Agency was "properly resourced" despite departmental cuts.

Follow roger on Twitter @rharrabin

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 557.

    Surely the solution is prevention is better than cure. I haven't seen a dredger or river maintenance team in years. Widen the rivers where needed and either store, or get rid of it 'faster'.
    Building standards have been improved in the last two decades beyond all recognition. I don't think I can say the same about watercourse management and maintenance.

  • rate this
    +55

    Comment number 398.

    It has amazed me for years how many people buy a home, in all probability the biggest purchase they are ever likely to make, without even bothering to do so much as look at an Ordnance Survey map before they hand over the money. They prpbably still don't deserve to be flooded, but the rest of us for sure don't deserve to pay for sorting out their resulting problems.

  • rate this
    +24

    Comment number 359.

    I grew up in an inner city house built around 1880 that had it's gutters drain off into the garden. If it was such a simple solution to the Victorians, why does it seem so hard to us?

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 272.

    We need to look to the uplands where felled trees are burnt as bio-fuel. This clearance enables rain to enter the catchment much faster compounding flood problems. In summer, rainfall will then cause erosion on dry hillsides with soils washing away to silt up the rivers downstream

    Development of upland areas for wind turbines also interrupts the natural water storage potential of the areas.

  • rate this
    +45

    Comment number 251.

    If builders and councils have been found to have let the ratepayers down by acting irresponsibly or even illegally, then both should be held accountable for their actions, long term.
    But how about the culpability of those who've actually bought houses in those areas? Being such a major purchase, it should demand that one goes into a deal with eyes open. It isn't always someone else's fault.

 

Comments 5 of 12

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

  • Children in Africa graphicBaby steps

    Are we seeing a child ‘survival revolution’?


  • Olive oil and olivesUbiquitous ingredient

    Was there a time when British people couldn't buy olive oil?


  • shadow of people kissing on grassOutdoor love

    Should the police intervene when people have sex in public?


  • Hand washing to contain Ebola in LiberiaEbola virus

    More action is needed to tackle Ebola, say experts


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.