Give drivers five minutes grace on parking tickets, MPs say

car parked on double yellow lines Councils receive hundreds of millions of pounds in parking fines

Related Stories

Drivers should be given "five minutes grace" after their parking tickets expire before facing fines, MPs on the Commons transport committee say.

It also said councils in England should publish annual parking-charge accounts if they want to prove they are not being used as a "cash cow"

The Transport Committee warned it was "neither acceptable nor legal" to use fines to increase revenue.

Councils made a surplus of hundreds of millions of pounds each year, it added.

The MPs urged ministers to freeze charges, currently capped at £130 in London and £70 outside. Councils said money raised went back into services.

Committee chairman, Labour MP Louise Ellman, said: "There is a deep-rooted public perception that parking enforcement is used as a cash cow, so it's essential that local authorities apply stringent transparency."

'Hard to justify'

The report said the Local Government Association had calculated a surplus from on- and off-street parking of £411m in 2011/12, while the RAC Foundation put the figure at £565m.

The maximum fixed penalty for speeding is £60, unless the case is referred to court.

Mrs Ellman argued the charging system was perverse, saying: "Annual parking accounts would allow the public to see how much local revenue is derived from the enforcement of fines, and what proportion of this come from on- or off-street parking charges.

"It's right that parking charges be determined locally, but hard to justify fines that substantially exceed penalties for more serious offences like speeding.

Start Quote

Parking charges are not inherently wrong but they need to be fair, and where penalties are levied they should be proportionate to the 'crime' committed”

End Quote Stephen Glaister Director RAC Foundation

"Central government should freeze the maximum penalty charge and develop differential fines for less serious parking violations. "

Mrs Ellman also said the Department for Transport's rules for councils should include a five-minute "grace-and-favour" period after tickets expire before imposing a fine.

A government spokesman said: "We welcome this report, which strengthens the case for changes to be made to parking rules.

"The law is clear. Parking is not a tax or cash cow for local councils. This government is reining in over-zealous parking enforcement and unfair parking practices, with the levels of parking penalty charges being kept under review."

But Peter Box, chairman of the Local Government Association's economy and transport board, said: "As this report recognises, parking controls are not being used by councils to raise revenue. They are essential for keeping motorists and pedestrians safe, traffic flowing and ensure people can park near their homes and local shops."

He added: "Councils always look to be open and transparent with residents on their parking policies.

"Any income they make from charges and fines is spent on running parking services, fixing potholes and providing subsidised travel to children and the elderly."

Last month, the government said it was considering banning fixed cameras and so-called "spy cars" used by councils to catch people parking illegally.

Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the RAC Foundation, welcomed the idea of getting councils to publish figures, saying it would "illuminate what many drivers regard as the murky world of parking policy".

"Parking charges are not inherently wrong but they need to be fair, and where penalties are levied they should be proportionate to the 'crime' committed.

"Local authorities are struggling with huge financial pressures but so are drivers. It is unacceptable that car users should be singled out as an easy way of shoring up shrinking budgets."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 619.

    I think 5 minutes grace is a good idea. Saturday i paid as normal an extortionate £5 to park for one hour outside my pregnancy class. I paid until 10.05am which usually covers the time to get out the 10am class to my car. However, being heavily pregnant i needed the toilet after the class this time, arrived at my car at 10.07 to find a parking ticket registered at 10.06! Shameful.

  • rate this

    Comment number 565.

    5 minutes grace? You are having a laugh.

    The councils run these enterprises like a private company and there are no prizes for these lottery tickets... just big penalty fees.

    Private company's need BIG PROFITS to keep shareholders happy and the same applies to councils because the money is alegedly used to improve infrastructure.

    Have they been buying pot holes to help calm traffic in my area?

  • rate this

    Comment number 527.

    the problem is that people will add the 5 minutes to the time they park & tthen complain about getting a ticket on the 5th minute & want 5 minutes more. A more sensible approach is to say parking wardens should be a bit more flexible, use a bit of commonsense & not hang around cars whose time is about to expire

  • rate this

    Comment number 524.

    5 mins grace will do nothing. if you were to have a grace period then 15mins would be an acceptable time period, BUT then where would it stop as some will argue that 15mins is too short, why not 20 or 30 or no parking charges.
    If you park on single or double yellow lines for anything other than a crucial emergency then its your own fault, groceries are not a get out for illegal parking.

  • rate this

    Comment number 463.

    What a stupid idea. If 5 minutes why not 10 or 15 ? Decide how long you need and get back within the time. I do my best to avoid parking where I have to pay preferring to walk a bit if necessary or go to an out of town centre (which are also big issue free zones).


Comments 5 of 8


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.