Vince Cable attacks government's £3,000 visitor bond

Vince Cable Vince Cable says Sarah Teather "over-reacted" by standing down as an MP

Related Stories

Vince Cable has criticised plans to make some overseas visitors pay a £3,000 "security bond" to enter the UK.

The business secretary said Home Secretary Theresa May was wrong to set the bond at such a level, which he said had caused "outrage" in India.

He called for a more "sensible and flexible" approach.

He also said he had "some sympathy" with Sarah Teather who is to quit as a Lib Dem MP over the party's stance on immigration and other policies.


But he said the former education minister had "over-reacted" and there was a "positive story to tell" about Lib Dem achievements in government.

Brent East MP Miss Teather told The Observer she had decided not to stand at the next election because visa bonds for "high risk" visitors - first suggested by Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg - had left her feeling "desolate" and "catastrophically depressed".

Mr Clegg first floated the idea of cash bonds to be paid by visitors from "high risk" countries in March.

But Mr Cable claimed the deputy prime minister's plan, which suggested a bond of £1,000, had been deliberately misinterpreted by some of their Conservative cabinet colleagues.

"What Nick Clegg said was if somebody in the Indian sub-continent, for example, was turned down for a visa, they could, as an alternative, come up with a bond," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"And had that proposal been accepted I think most people would not have seen a problem with it. It would actually make it easier for some people to come who had good reason to do so.

"But the way some of our colleagues interpreted was in a much more negative way, of saying that everybody who comes here should pay this very large bond and that's what Sarah reacted against."

'High risk'

He said both he and Nick Clegg would be arguing in government for a "much more sensible and flexible" approach to the policy, which had yet to be finalised.

And he claimed Theresa May's version of the plan would harm relations with important trading partners such as India.

The bond idea, to be piloted from November, is aimed at deterring people from "high risk" countries staying in the UK once their short-term visas expire.

It has been reported that visitors from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Ghana and Nigeria will be required to deposit £3,000 ($4,600) for a six-month visa, to be forfeited if they don't leave when they should.

Mrs May says the problem of so-called "overstayers" was one of the biggest challenges facing the immigration system and they want to target visitors from certain countries who present the greatest risk.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 419.

    This might work.
    Is the amount actually high enough ?
    Considering what Healthcare alone might be worth........
    Really people should work hard to improve their own countries it can be done.

  • rate this

    Comment number 215.

    why do we have immigration:-
    provide a wealth of talent
    providing workers
    and attract business
    Although immigration has changed and some people will view this comment as a "let them steal our jobs" thing but in truth immigrants are important to every country in the world.
    How is a fee going to attract immagrants that can improve the economy?
    Good on you Vince for supporting the economy

  • rate this

    Comment number 134.

    Britain became Great Britain because of non-British. From human to natural resources, our industries and even the food that we eat everyday are mostly dependant and survive on foreign nationals. Investors will definitely think twice before considering the UK. The British Visa fees are already high enough and any further barrier to coming to the UK is just adding salt to wound.

  • rate this

    Comment number 39.


    Personally I feel that £3,000 is not sufficient...... Would other countries & states put up with it, no they would not, why should we?. We really need politicians who can think about the real world around them before they speak.


    When some people's wages are round £250 per month how are travellers expected to afford this in additon to their travel costs?

  • rate this

    Comment number 21.

    Cable - "if somebody in the Indian sub-continent, for example, was turned down for a visa, they could, as an alternative, come up with a bond". Am I hearing you right Vinny? If they don't meet the criteria they can pay their way in?

    He continues, " It would actually make it easier for some people to come who had good reason to do so" - in that case they should get a everyone else.


Comments 5 of 6


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.