Show courage and back changes, Ed Miliband tells unions

 

Labour leader Ed Miliband: "I am absolutely determined change will happen"

Related Stories

Ed Miliband has urged unions to have "the courage to change", as he attempts to persuade them to back an overhaul of the way Labour is funded.

Several unions have attacked the Labour leader over his plans to remove the automatic payment of fees by millions of their members to the party.

But Mr Miliband told the TUC that this "historic" change would strengthen his chances at the general election.

He also predicted Labour's membership could swell to more than 500,000.

Mr Miliband and several union leaders have disagreed during this week's annual TUC meeting in Bournemouth about his plans to change the way the party's funding works.

However BBC political correspondent Chris Mason said the speech was not a "leadership defining bust-up with the unions", with Mr Miliband stressing areas of agreement - such as living standards, zero hour contracts and wages.

'My vision'

The Labour leader wants to abolish the automatic affiliation fee paid each year by about three million union members to Labour.

Instead he proposes giving people the choice of "opting in" - becoming full Labour members - when they join a Labour-supporting union.

Mr Miliband acknowledges this will cost money, but argues it will expand his party and increase activism.

Graphic: Top three sources of income by party,2012

One union leader accused him of "living in cloud cuckoo land", while others have also voiced concerns.

But Labour front bencher Chuka Umunna told BBC Radio 4's The World at One the party was willing to risk financial harm "because it's the right thing to do".

The proposed changes follow a row over allegations that the Unite union tried to rig the Labour choice of a candidate for the Falkirk seat at the next general election. An investigation by Labour has found no evidence of wrongdoing, emboldening his critics.

Ahead of his speech, Mr Miliband told ITV's Daybreak "we are going to get these changes through", adding that Labour's internal structures were "old-fashioned" and had to change.

Start Quote

We need to build a party truly rooted in the lives of all the working people of Britain once more”

End Quote Ed Miliband

Labour MP John McDonnell said the row had bolstered the power of the unions who now had six months to make demands of the party.

In his speech, delivered to a subdued audience, Mr Miliband said: "We have three million working men and women affiliated to our party. But the vast majority play no role in our party.

"They are affiliated in name only. That wasn't the vision of the founders of our party. I don't think it's your vision either. And it's certainly not my vision.

"That's why I want to make each and every affiliated trade union member a real part of their local party, making a real choice to be a part of our party so they can have a real voice in it."

Mr Miliband added: "This is an historic opportunity to begin bringing people back into the decisions which affect their lives.

"It means we could become a Labour Party not of 200,000 people, but 500,000, or many more. A party rooted in every kind of workplace in the country, a party rooted in every community in the country, a genuine living, breathing movement."

'Oozes contempt'

The Labour leader called his plan a "massive challenge" but said: "It is you who have been telling me year after year about a politics that is detached from the lives of working people. We need to build a party truly rooted in the lives of all the working people of Britain once more.

Dave Prentis: "Where I was brought up... you were always taught never wash your dirty linen in public"

During his speech, Mr Miliband attacked the Conservatives, accusing David Cameron of showing "contempt" for working people.

He said: "We have a prime minister who writes you and your members off, who doesn't just write you off, but oozes contempt for you from every pore. What does he say about you? He says your members are a 'threat to our economy'. Back to 'the enemy within'.

"Six and a half million people in Britain who teach our children, who look after the sick, who care for the elderly, who build our homes, who keep our shops open morning, noon and night. They're not the enemy within. They're the people who make Britain what it is.

"How dare he? How dare he insult people, members of trades unions as he does? How dare he write off whole sections of our society?"

Dinner speech

Mr Miliband repeated the slogan he first used at last year's Labour conference, of his party being the UK's "one nation party".

Start Quote

Our Labour leadership has to start demonstrating they are on the side of ordinary working people”

End Quote Len McCluskey Unite general secretary

But he faces a difficult task to persuade leaders of several of the major unions that his proposed changes are justified.

Paul Kenny of the GMB - which has cut its funding for the party by £1.2m a year - mocked the plans as looking as if they had been made up "after a night out".

Unite general secretary Len McCluskey warned at fringe meeting: "Our Labour leadership has to start demonstrating they are on the side of ordinary working people."

But Dave Prentis of Unison said the squabbling and "infighting" had to stop, or people would not vote Labour in 2015.

And the TUC general secretary, Frances O'Grady, used her speech to the Congress on Monday to ask union activists to "roll up their sleeves" and influence Labour's policies, while opposing the Conservatives.

Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps said: "Instead of taking on the unions, Ed Miliband has buckled under pressure. He's backed down over Falkirk, backed down over serious reforms to the union link.

'While Ed Miliband is spending his time trying to soothe his biggest paymasters, we're dealing with the deficit, controlling immigration and fixing the welfare system to help hardworking people."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 767.

    Anxious @764
    "knew you were
    going to say that"

    So predictable, the humble democrat!

    Predictability of course comes with shareability, in reason (an absolute construct) and morality (a social construct tending towards an absolute with Darwinian experience)

    No sitting-back: but some comfort to be taken in 'Providence', the grain of 'the creation'

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 766.

    After careful deliberation to this I am on the side and positive for Ed Milliband.
    Why should ANY Labour Supporter automatically be deducted fees?
    Would I be deducted conscription charges for a magazine without first giving approval?

    It also ensures that the unions work harder for their members - you do not support the workers - you lose your financial support.

    Alternatively no fees NO SUPPORT.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 765.

    The old saying goes, "Never put all your Eds in one basket"......unless it's one Len placed at the end of a guillotine, after pulling the lever.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 764.

    Re 762.All for All
    &
    Re 763.Anxious

    Are you a relative of Uri Geller?
    I knew you were going to say that ;-) !

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 763.

    The root of the problem is our form of government.
    It is a Representitive Goverment, meaning that the government do not necessarily do as the voters want but what MP's think is best (usually for themselves).

    With lots of clout (money=power) Big Business runs the country.
    Joe public has no chance - and the government gets tied up in knots.

    It should be two way deals workers&bosses see eg GERMANY

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 762.

    alanbelfast @760
    "Labour represents Big Business"

    All governments rely on 'big business', for contributions to infrastructure, to the mass market, and to a healthy balance of trade.

    Trouble has been, still is, not understanding need of equal partnership, trapped in conflict of interest, 'big business' - and 'big unions' - have been indulged against each other, to the heavy cost of all.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 761.

    Ed talking today he could be from any party.They all just don't want to rock the boat, Money is more important than policy's it seams.

    why care what you voters want when you get 6.6 million in grants for nothing?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 760.

    The trade union movement was key to the establishment of the Labour party. Whilst Labour represented trade unionists and working people in general it made perfect sense for the unions to provide financial support. Now that Labour represents big business continued union support is insane.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 759.

    balzac @752
    "Labour represents
    the (crude) majority…"

    Labour might say so, and mean so, but in ignorance of 'democracy' has repeatedly left the public equally ignorant, victims of a 'wheel of fortune' carrying us all down hill, as vulnerable as ever to the rule of fear and greed, heading fast through the destruction of people & planet, past horror for many, fortunes-of-war for a few, we few?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 758.

    470.ahwasright
    There is only one man capable of saving this country of absolute ruin Nick Griffin.
    -
    I'd say he's the second least preferable man, but still way ahead of Nigel Farage. In Griffin's defence, at least his funding is transparent, not hedge funds, tax evaders and vested interests like UKIP

    The only plus side I've seen from the BNP is their support for workers rights

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 757.

    751.Precariat

    Is Tony Blair still a member of the labour party they should have thrown him out by now, I will not vote for them again until they do!
    ===
    What a pity, all they needed was a casting vote and he'd have been out.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 756.

    Ed Miliband is like a vacume, full of nothing.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 755.

    Is there a union to stand up to the bullying unions, as they seem to be the paymasters now? Especially as they told Ed do as you're told or we take all your money away.

    Perhaps Ed will be put on Zero Hours by the Unions soon!

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 754.

    "747.
    Albert

    People need to hear what he would do to improve their quality of lives and the fairness of the society they inhabit."

    I'm no great Labour fan, but how is expanding the East Coast train model, legislating against exploitation in the workplace, creating apprenticeships and jobs for school leavers and abolishing free-schools to create state-school places not about quality of life?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 753.

    Otto Sump @748
    "viable economic strategy
    source of confusion"
    All bar Green?

    Return 'socialism' to 'roots': living in belief 'better together'

    Then, debate Tory socialism, and Labour socialism, and species of 'libertarian' anti-social-ism (Bastiat, Hayek, and imitators)!

    What better 'strategy' than mobilising all, in equal partnership? As in marriage & business, honestly 'in it together'? Trust

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 752.

    Unions should represent the general interests of workers, which, particularly in corporate, neo-liberal Britain, will not often be the same as those of employers who would rather issue zero-hours contracts and pay themselves and shareholders huge bonuses. Labour represents the majority, too, and it's evidence of apparent brainwashing that so few posters seem to know this.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 751.

    Is Tony Blair still a member of the labour party they should have thrown him out by now, I will not vote for them again until they do!

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 750.

    I see an embarrassing reversal of policy on the horizon.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 749.

    @746
    I agree with most of what you say, but Ed is inexperienced and still developing. Sometimes he has a glimmer a future statesman, as in the Syria vote. I liked much of his speech to the TUC (I watched all of it), Abolishing zero hours contracts, returning the recourse to tribunals that Osborne took away etc. But linking Socialism to a viable economic strategy, that seems a source of confusion.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 748.

    Precariat @745
    "bring back clause-4"
    To PAY 'robber-barons'?
    No. Not Clause 4.

    IF we understand equal partnership, it will be as a people, agreeing to live on equal incomes, agreeing to make those incomes mean the best they can, caring for people & planet, our shared environment, energy sustainability, craft and real value in whatever we produce. Some compensation for some foreign owners, maybe

 

Page 1 of 39

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.