Syria crisis: Robust response needed, David Cameron says


Prime Minister David Cameron: "We must listen to Parliament"

A "robust response" to the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria is needed despite UK military involvement being ruled out, the prime minister has said.

David Cameron was defeated in the Commons as MPs rejected a motion on the principle that military action could be required to protect Syrian civilians.

Despite the result of the vote, the US said it would continue to seek a coalition for military intervention.

And France said the vote did not change its resolve about the need to act.

At the scene

The weapons inspectors this morning seemed to be in two or three minds about what was going on.

Twice they left the garage of the hotel where they and foreign correspondents are staying, looking as if they were ready to head out, and twice they went back in.

Perhaps they had a plan to visit some of the suburbs held by rebels that they had been going into to take samples, but there has been a lot of shelling going on in that direction today.

Now they are here at the regime's military hospital. There have been claims from the regime itself that they had soldiers wounded by chemical weapons, and perhaps those are the people they have come to see.

Russia - which has close ties with the the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad - welcomed the UK's rejection of a military strike, while Germany has ruled out participation in any action.

Washington said it remained committed to a possible strike and would seek to build a coalition of those in favour of possible military action.

President Obama convened the US National Security Council earlier, according to the AFP news agency.

The White House believes President Assad's regime was responsible for the chemical attack on 21 August which it says killed 1,429 people in the Ghouta suburb of Damascus - a figure far higher than previously reported.

US Secretary of State John Kerry said the Syrian forces carefully prepared for the attack days in advance.

UN weapons inspectors have finished their investigation in Syria and are expected to deliver their preliminary findings to secretary general Ban Ki-moon on Saturday.

Mr Cameron said it was a "regret" that he had been unable to build a consensus on the response to the suspected chemical weapons attack.

However he insisted the UK remained "deeply engaged" on the world stage.

Ian Pannell: The victims "arrived like the walking dead"

The UK government's defeated motion had called for military action if it was backed up by evidence from the weapons inspectors.

In Syria, the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen said he had spoken to people inside President Assad's administration who were "cock-a-hoop" at the UK vote. "They believe it counts as a victory for them," he added.

"We will defend ourselves," Dr Bassam Abu Abdullah from the Syrian Information Ministry said, warning of danger "not only on the Syrian people but... the whole region" if the US decided to attack.

'Appalling crime'

In an interview at Downing Street, Mr Cameron said it was important to listen to Parliament's decision.

Start Quote

Many British former senior officers are relieved that Parliament has - certainly for now - prevented deeper UK involvement in Syria ”

End Quote

And despite MPs voting against military action, he said: "I think it's important we have a robust response to the use of chemical weapons and there are a series of things we will continue to do."

Mr Cameron added: "We will continue to take a case to the United Nations, we will continue to work in all the organisations we are members of - whether the EU, or Nato, or the G8 or the G20 - to condemn what's happened in Syria.

"It's important we uphold the international taboo on the use of chemical weapons."

There had been suggestions from ministers, including Defence Secretary Phillip Hammond, that Britain's rejection of military action would harm its relationship with the US.

Mr Hammond warned against the vote allowing Britain to "turn into a country that prefers to turn its back".

"We must stay engaged with the world," he told the BBC.

Mr Cameron, though, said he would not have to apologise to President Barack Obama.

"I was faced with three things I wanted to do right and do in the right way," he said.

The BBC's Jeremy Bowen reports from Damascus where he says the the vote by UK MPs is seen as a victory

"First of all, to condemn absolutely and respond properly to an appalling war crime that took place in Syria. Secondly, to work with our strongest and most important ally who had made a request for British help. Thirdly, to act as a democrat, to act in a different way to previous prime ministers and properly consult Parliament.

"I wanted to do all those three things. Obviously politics is difficult - that involved going to Parliament, making an argument in a strong and principled way but then listening to Parliament.

"I think the American people and President Obama will understand that."

In other developments:

  • The BBC witnessed the aftermath of an incendiary bomb attack on a school playground in northern Syria which left scores of children with napalm-like burns
  • The US said it would act in its "best interests" in dealing with the Syria crisis, following UK rejection of military intervention
  • French President Francois Hollande said all options were being considered, and has not ruled out a strike within days
  • UN weapons inspectors visited a hospital in a government-controlled area of Damascus
  • The Foreign Office advised against all but essential travel to Lebanon because of a "heightened risk of anti-Western sentiment" linked to the possibility of military action in Syria. The BBC understands that the families of British diplomats are being evacuated
  • Former Australian foreign minister Gareth Evans - architect of the so-called "responsibility to protect" doctrine - accused the UK of "making things up as it goes along". He blamed the government's "mishandling of the politics" for what he said was a "disappointing" vote against intervention
  • The Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said there was "no doubt" President Assad's forces carried out the chemical attack
Graphic showing break down of how the UK parties' MPs voted

Labour leader Ed Miliband told the BBC: "I think ill thought-through military action would have made life worse, not better, for the Syrian people."

He accused the government of not learning the lessons of Iraq, adding MPs had "sent a message" that British forces would not be deployed "without going through the United Nations and without ensuring we have regard to the consequences in the region".

Syrians search under rubble to rescue people from houses that were destroyed by a Syrian government warplane, in Idlib province, northern Syria, Friday, Aug. 30, 2013 The two-year long civil war continues to inflict huge damage on the country

Earlier he said Mr Cameron was guilty of "reckless and impulsive leadership".

And the prime minister faced criticism from his own side, with former shadow home secretary David Davis accusing him of making a "shaky argument" for intervention.

"There was feeling of rushing to action," he told BBC Radio 4's World at One programme. "It's more important to get this right than to do it on a 10-day timetable".

Syrian refugees at the Cilvegozu crossing gate at Reyhanli in Antakya Refugees from Syria have been crossing the border into Turkey

Former Liberal Democrat leader Lord Ashdown has been critical of the decision to not take part in military action, saying the UK was "hugely diminished".

More than 100,000 people are estimated to have died since the conflict erupted in March 2011 and at least 1.7 million refugees displaced.

The violence began when anti-government protests during the Arab Spring uprisings were met with a brutal response by the Syrian security forces.

President Assad's regime has blamed foreign involvement and armed gangs for the conflict.

How could a potential strike be launched?
Syria map
Forces which could be used against Syria:

Four US destroyers - USS Gravely, USS Ramage, USS Barry and USS Mahan - are in the eastern Mediterranean, equipped with cruise missiles. The missiles can also be fired from submarines, but the US Navy does not reveal their locations

Airbases at Incirlik and Izmir in Turkey, and in Jordan, could be used to carry out strikes

Two aircraft carriers - USS Nimitz and USS Harry S Truman are in the wider region

French aircraft carrierCharles de Gaulle is currently in Toulon in the western Mediterranean

French Raffale and Mirage aircraft can also operate from Al-Dhahra airbase in the UAE


More on This Story

Syria conflict


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1546.

    Something needs to be done. I have family in Syria who are unable to leave and fear for their homes and their lives. Do they fear the army?? NO they fear the rebels as most of them are not even Syrian. Are we really gonna sit back and let this happen regardless of who is using chemical weapons ??????

  • rate this

    Comment number 1545.

    If the UK and US attack Syria and the IRAN attacks Israel, what than ????! good luck US and UK - you defend Israel also gainst IRAN than?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1544.

    I'm a British person, and I'm not with the rest of the popular democracy. We should do something.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1543.

    Do the BBC gauge public opinion and then go against it just for the fun of it?

    Yesterday, NO WAR

    Today, Yeah but, Panorama got some footage init

  • Comment number 1542.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1541.

    True democracy - does not strive to demolish and polarise, it pushes for peace

  • rate this

    Comment number 1540.

    We can't take care of our own people at home but we have the money to enter another war??

    Something should have been done long before now but Mr Cameron can't be out done by Mrs T is what I think this is now all about.

    Cameron should resign without delay!!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1539.

    Time to keep quiet Mr Cameron, we don't want you on the world stage wasting our money on bombs etc, as you found out last night....the more so given your ill considered haste and pandering to Uncle Sam.

    We want you sorting out the mess here, it will be a long time before we consider you fit to sort out messes elsewhere.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1538.

    I am ashamed! I love my country and I love the democracy that our country allows. But how can we sleep, after effectively saying to Syria, “ use chemicals, it’s ok,” Was I the only one that saw the kids lying there, dying?

    Are we now some insignificant, subservient and pathetic country that just likes to say hey, its kids being killed, who cares? Milibands actions yesterday were a disgrace

  • rate this

    Comment number 1537.

    1466. teddy100

    Agent orange was used to clear vegetation - The US didn't purposely target civilians. And Napalm (used recently in the latest attack on a Syrian school) is not a Chemical weapon. Seems you're grasping at straws and I don't think anything you're saying really has any merit with regards to Syria. It's 2013, not 1960, the subject is Syria not Vietnam.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1536.

    people rallying for a war when the inspectors haven't even said if chemical weapons were used or by whom.
    and people don't seem to see that the other side of the syrian conflict is Al-Qaeda. give it 10 years and you'll see Taliban like forces in Libya and Syria is this american attack goes ahead.
    its in Israel's interest to destroy all enemies around it and its using this as an excuse to rally USA

  • rate this

    Comment number 1535.

    It's good, finally they aren't backing Americans imperial foreign policy, end of the day it only puts British soldiers in danger and costs the tax payer

    Who cares about Britain word standings. Look how powerful Germany is economically in Europe and its not getting involved either.

    America won't be even be going down the UN route now and i think Israel will be helping them loads .

  • rate this

    Comment number 1534.

    History has shown a couple of lessons...generally when the West intervenes in the Arab world things don't quite go to plan...and claims of WMDs or chemical attacks are very hard to find evidence for, or to really know who is responsible. There is no surer sign of madness than doing the same things and expecting a different result, so surely the vote against military action makes perfect sense

  • rate this

    Comment number 1533.


    'For all those that are against Uk Military strike watch this footage from The Minstry of propoganda today'

    Edited your typos.

    Name the school, name the victims, name the hospital they're being treated at, wonder why despite being horrifically burned they can manage to give interviews and peace signs an hour later.

    Little slow on the uptake aren't you?

  • rate this

    Comment number 1532.

    That graphic illustrating how MPs voted is troubling. Why is this a party-political issue? Why not give everyone a free vote? The party-political snipes we've been hearing since the vote are distasteful given the context. I

  • rate this

    Comment number 1531.

    Editor's Picks reflects the usual pro-war bias, I see. Yesterday two of five editor's picks were pro-war even though the anti-war posts outnumbered the pro-war 10 to 1. Today 4 of 5 editor's picks are pro-war even though the comments are 50-50 at best. Coverage as a whole has been an almost complete pro-war whitewash despite the clear anti-war mood in the country.

  • Comment number 1530.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • Comment number 1529.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 1528.

    I think you've raised the elephant in the room as far as the BBC and HYS goes. We never get to debate things like that!

  • rate this

    Comment number 1527.

    Ed Miliband has behaved entirely correctly.He emerges from this in a very strong position and will undoubtedly be a major threat to the Coalition Government at the next election.Cameron appears now to be a lame duck PM. Clegg,unsurprisingly,has been totally overshadowed during this debate.


Page 52 of 129


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.