Labour rules out borrowing to reverse coalition cuts

 

Ed Miliband: "The circumstances we face will be more difficult than at any time for generations"

Labour would not increase borrowing to reverse cuts in government spending, Ed Miliband has told activists as he warned the party must be "credible".

Mr Miliband said Labour must face up to the "hard reality" that it will not be able to reverse spending cuts scheduled by the coalition for 2015-16.

The party's leader told its policy forum if Labour wins the next election, it will be in "tough" economic times.

The Conservatives said Mr Miliband was "too weak" to stick to the promise.

Mr Miliband said: "Our starting point for 2015/16 is that we won't be able to reverse the cuts in day-to-day current spending unless it is fully funded from savings elsewhere or extra revenue, not from more borrowing."

'Crystal clear'

He was speaking ahead of Chancellor George Osborne's Spending Review on Wednesday, which will set out the government's spending plans for the year following the general election in 2015.

Analysis

Ed Miliband is attempting a balancing act.

On the one hand, he wants to enthuse his party by promising a Miliband government would introduce radical social changes; on the other, he's trying to convince voters that those changes wouldn't involve borrowing more money - at least in the first year.

He wants to be seen as trustworthy and disciplined on the economy, but he risks giving some voters the impression that he's not offering much that's different from the coalition parties.

His nostalgic references to the Attlee government are an attempt to show he has a bold vision.

But as the general election draws closer, he'll come under increasing pressure to translate that vision into hard, detailed policies.

And that's where his critics claim he'll come unstuck.

The majority of government departments are facing cuts of between 8% and 10%.

"When George Osborne stands up next week and announces his cuts..." Mr Miliband said, "we won't be able to promise now to reverse them because we've got to be absolutely crystal clear about where the money is coming from."

Hammering home his message on the economic inheritance Labour will face should it regain power after the next election, Mr Miliband described it as the "toughest for a generation".

Labour has already said it would withdraw the winter fuel allowance from the wealthiest pensioners, and would not reverse coalition cuts to child benefit for households where one person earns more than £50,000.

"People will only put their trust in us if we show we are credible," Mr Miliband said.

'Same old Labour'

But the Conservative Party chairman, Grant Shapps, dismissed the pledge, saying the opposition leader was "too weak to stick to his promises".

Clement Atlee Ed Miliband drew comparisons with the 1945 Clement Atlee Labour government

"Ed Miliband only offers more spending, more borrowing and more debt - the same old Labour approach that got us into this mess in the first place," he said.

Mr Miliband also set out plans to penalise property developers who "sit on land" rather than building new homes.

And he drew parallels with Clement Atlee's 1945 Labour government, saying that as well as creating the NHS and building homes, it also ran budget surpluses.

"By the end of their time in government they were actually starting to pay off the war time debt. But nobody in this party and nobody in this country thinks that government didn't make a difference," he said.

In an earlier speech to Liberal Democrat activists, leader Nick Clegg warned his party it risks "irrelevance" if it retreats to the "comfort blanket of opposition".

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 773.

    In order not to increase borrowing, so as not to reduce services and make no cuts to public spending, where is the money going to come from in order to maintain services etc?

    Yes, you've guessed it... the man in the street through taxes, - oh yes, they'll be there, blatant, like PAYE, or hidden amidst Labour rhetoric!

    Don't worry people, the Tories won't get a majority either... oh dearie me!!

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 772.

    @765: "Socialism has failed in every country that adopted it"

    It's socialism that is keeping the worldwide economies alive from the banking implosion. It's socialism that's absorbing all the losses incurred by private debt.

    The people with no real skills, ambitions or jobs are the politicians, the bankers and all the associated blackmailing cronies -- the ruling elite.

    You must get out more.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 771.

    Re 765---We have a member of the ruling class online: can some of those on ESA get a job as your under-sub-vice-temp butler or chamber maid please ?
    Wow: ruling class:I'm just so impressed. I feel like a truly impressed bloke who is holding up a huge banner which says "I'm really impressed by meeting one of the ruling class". And I have a cunning plan:ever heard of what the Tennis Court Oath ?

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 770.

    766.SocialistNetwork
    The truth is that like the church, unions are fast becoming irrelevant to most in the UK. The world is changing and socialism is now just a relic from the past.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 769.

    Milliband can make this statement very easily. He know full well, that if by some fluke, he were to be elected to power (an extremely unlikely scenario) nobody would lend him and Ed Balls a cup of sugar let alone money. Milliband is just the last wimper of a once great party. Pay him no attention.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 768.

    Will they ship us to China to work?

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 767.

    756.Natasha
    ".Voting ought to be compulsory in union votes for strike action, .. turn out is less than 100% the vote is void. I have received bullying, intimidation and vile threats unprintable here from your noble union officials."
    ===
    Gen. Election turnout < 100% so Tory Gov. invalid.

    I have had 'bullying, intimidation and vile threats unprintable here' from several Employers. I need a Union!

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 766.

    756. Oh Natasha, you're even a bare faced liar or a bitter manager or HR consultant who's no stranger to bullying working class folk yourself.
    Unions exist because it's better to have an independent body speak on workers behalf because unlike internal non union recognised employee forums, the Union Officer can't be bullied, intimidated or bought off in order to avoid a collective voice.

  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 765.

    759 Socialist Network

    Socialism has failed in every country that adopted it, or maybe you think North Korea is a utopia in which unions are hailed as the champion of people.

    The problem with this country is people with no ambition, a job with little responsibility and little if any educational attainment vote labour without understanding the consequences.

    Thank god for the ruling class

  • Comment number 764.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 763.

    756.Natasha
    Quite so long as political donations from companies are not exempt of tax and come with the majority of shareholder approval not voted for by the board but by every shareholder with what they think they are getting for the donation being in the question. People with trusts should be barred from public office (that's me as well).

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 762.

    'Mr Miliband said Labour must face up to the "hard reality" that it will not be able to reverse spending cuts scheduled by the coalition for 2015-16.'
    Absolute rubbish. If elected, it's absolutely the first thing that must be done. On other cuts, the first reversal should be the 45% upper tax rate

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 761.

    #748
    Advancement in what sense? Do you really believe the Bullingdon set really gives a toss about ordinary people who work hard and pay taxes? Can you really be that naive?

    Not saying the competition is fab, given that Tory Blur and Meddlesome were tories in all but name but, still, to be conned by this menagerie of mediocre clowns takes exceptional gullibility.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 760.

    @747 Efficient taxation of capital (rather than income) ought to be a socialist priority. Can anyone remind me why Development Land Tax was abandoned in 1985? A Tory government then, of course...

    What might raise revenue and stimulate construction now would be a tax on delayed development.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 759.

    748.Man from the Midlands "People who vote Tory (working class or not), do so for valid reasons, usually to do with a believe in self-advancement".
    What, so you think aspiration is by sheer virtue of the party you vote for , yet they are still working class ? LOL
    John Steinbeck referred to this mentality for the reason why Socialism never caught on in the U.S. "Embarrassed Millionaires".

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 758.

    Seems Labour have gone from saying (at the last election) that they wouldn't cut anything - they would in fact inject (borrow) more money into the economy. Now they are saying that they wouldn't reverse the cuts by borrowing money. So are they admitting it would have been wrong of them to borrow the money to inject into the economy?

  • Comment number 757.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 756.

    742 Socialist Network
    The unions who use bullying, intimidation and threats to make sure the result of a vote for strike action is always positive, hence turn outs of 20%. Voting ought to be compulsory in union votes for strike action, if the turn out is less than 100% the vote is void. I have received bullying, intimidation and vile threats unprintable here from your noble union officials.

  • Comment number 755.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 754.

    Are we building barrages to harness the unending tidal rise and fall around our coasts so we wouldn't need to import electricity...No! Are we building 'super' incinerators so we don't have to pay 'levies' to the EU...No! Are we creating jobs so that more people pay tax...No! Are we taxing the super-rich...No! Do not talk about coalition government, they couldn't coali(ish) a fish sandwich!

 

Page 1 of 39

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

  • Nigel Farage (left) and Douglas CarswellWho's next?

    The Tory MPs being tipped to follow Carswell to UKIP


  • A painting of the White House on fire by Tom FreemanFinders keepers

    The odd objects looted by the British from Washington in 1814


  • President Barack Obama pauses during a press conference on 28 August.'No strategy'

    Obama's gaffe on Islamic State reveals political truth


  • Chris and Regina Catrambone with their daughter Maria LuisaSOS

    The millionaires who rescue people at sea


  • Plane7 days quiz

    What unusual offence got a Frenchman thrown off a plane?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.