Syria arms: Parliament would get vote, Hague pledges

 

William Hague: "As things stand the world is failing the people of Syria"

Parliament would get to vote before the UK sent any arms to Syrian opposition forces, William Hague has said.

More than 80 Conservative MPs have written to David Cameron urging Parliament to be consulted if the UK decides to provide any weapons.

The foreign secretary told the BBC that while there was no established procedure for such a situation, there "will be a vote one way or another".

He also suggested MPs could be recalled if they were in recess at the time.

The UK and France have led calls for more support for the official opposition in Syria, but MPs from all parties have warned of the dangers of escalating a conflict that has already claimed the lives of 80,000, and of strengthening extremist elements.

'Controversial'

The EU lifted its embargo on arms to either side in the conflict last month, but the UK has insisted no action will be taken immediately and its focus is on planned peace talks in Geneva and efforts to secure a negotiated settlement.

Mr Hague told the BBC's Andrew Marr programme that any decision to send arms into the war zone would be "controversial" and that people justifiably had "strong views" about the issue.

Start Quote

The Syrian rebels urgently need their own surface-to-air missiles and tank-busters to have any chance of winning. Britain can and should supply them with them”

End Quote Brooks Newmark Conservative MP

He said the UK would be "very reluctant" to send arms but the reality was that tens of thousands of people were being killed and that forces opposed to the Syrian government did not have the means to defend themselves.

"As things stand today, the world is failing the people of Syria," he said.

Pressed on whether Parliament would be given a chance to vote on the issue before any decision was taken, he said there was no established procedure but the government had a "very good record" of seeking Parliamentary consent.

"There would be a vote one way or another. I can't see any reason why it would not be before any decision was implemented."

'One-sided war'

The EU has said the situation will be reviewed again on 1 August, leading some MPs to express concerns that a decision could be taken during the six-week summer recess when Parliament is not sitting.

But Mr Hague said: "I think if we were making such a decision and it was very controversial, there would be a huge demand for the recall of Parliament and I think I can be very reassuring to MPs about this subject."

Conservative MP Julian Lewis has suggested the government would be "unwise" to proceed without consulting Parliament and there was a strong possibility that the government would lose any vote.

Speaking on Friday, Mr Lewis said that if ministers thought they could "get this thing through behind Parliament's back during the recess, they are having to think again".

But Conservative MP Brooks Newmark, who has met Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on several occasions, said it was clear the Syrian leader was "willing to destroy Syria completely and kill its people in vast numbers to protect his family".

Writing in the Mail on Sunday, he said the conflict was currently "one-sided", with the authorities receiving military support from Russia and Iran, while the opposition was fragmented and under-equipped.

"The Syrian rebels urgently need their own surface-to-air missiles and tank-busters to have any chance of winning. Britain can and should supply them with them," he said.

 

More on This Story

Syria conflict

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +18

    Comment number 222.

    Arm the regime we'll be seen as supporting oppressors to the people of Syria, arm the opposition and risk extreme Islamic groups on the rise, do nothing and been seen as merciless. Although i stand on the side of doing nothing, even though it sounds harsh we don't great that great assets in Syria for me to consider interfering and risking further damnation of the little economy we have.

  • rate this
    +111

    Comment number 56.

    How about letting US vote? I can assure you that most people want to stay out. Just shows how misrepresented the British public are by 'politicians'.

  • rate this
    +55

    Comment number 36.

    I just get this goverment.As the country battles daily with its own problems (nhs cut backs.benefit withdrawls for needy folk,and endless other cutbacks. the goverment is prepared to spend more millions on other countrys problems.We had the iraq war then afganistan billions wasted.It would be nice for the uk citizens to be asked what there money is going on.The people at the top need to get a grip

  • rate this
    +28

    Comment number 33.

    The geopolitical situation of the region and beyond is very different now, and any messing up by the West in the region will inevitably boomerang against them mercilessly.

  • rate this
    +16

    Comment number 32.

    It seems reasonable to let MP's vote; so now you just have to email your MP with your stance. Ask your MP to publish numbers for and against and how he/she voted and hey, you get democracy.

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.