Ed Balls seeks to restore Labour's economic credibility

 

Ed Balls shadow chancellor: "In tough economic times we have to make difficult choices about priorities"

On Budget Day in just two years' time the man holding the red box outside No 11 may be Labour's Ed Balls. That will only happen if he can restore Labour's economic credibility.

Today the shadow chancellor came to the City to deliver a speech designed to do just that. His message was the same as ever and yet different.

As always he claimed that the government's austerity economics was failing and forcing ministers to search for another £11bn in cuts they never planned to make.

However, he also acknowledged that Labour would have no choice but to go along with many of those cuts and would treat them as "a starting point" for their policies in government.

In other words he was telling his party, as well as the country, that for all his talk of growth and jobs the next Labour government will find itself having to cut day-to-day spending more and tax more too - albeit according to different priorities.

Those hoping he would spell out Labour's spending plans for 2015 - the first year they might be in office - and set out his so-called fiscal rules - ie how fast he aims to reduce the deficit and Britain's debt - were disappointed. He insists that with the economy so uncertain now is not the time.

However, there was one firm commitment - Labour says that the 600,000 pensioners who earn enough to pay higher or top rate tax should no longer get the annual winter fuel allowance.

This is more symbolically significant than it is economically. After all, the party has always stressed its commitment to universalism - the idea that all get the same benefit regardless of their incomes - as a way of binding society together. Besides, as I pointed out to the shadow chancellor, it saves just £100m, which is not much more than one thousandth of the projected annual deficit in 2015.

A sign of how big a step the party regards this is the fact that Mr Balls insisted that Labour would keep the free pensioners bus pass and free prescriptions. The party remembers all too well how Gordon Brown used the threat to benefits to the elderly as a stick to beat David Cameron with at the last election.

Labour opposed the coalition's cut to child benefit for those on higher and top rate tax and still insists it was unfair. It is projected to raise 23 times more than means testing winter fuel payments. So, either Balls will have to be clear that it is a cut he can't restore, or he will have to come up with a new more affordable lower level of child benefit which all can receive.

In truth, economic credibility depends less on published plans and more on public trust. That is why Ed Balls won't stop reminding voters that the coalition's economic plans are way off course and leading to cuts they never dreamt of making.

However, he - unlike most opposition spokesman - also has a personal record to defend. For years he was Gordon Brown's chief economic adviser - in reality if not always in name. Today he insisted that Labour had not been profligate in those years.

His Tory opponents beg to differ of course and having long memories or, perhaps just access to Google, discovered that 17 years ago another shadow chancellor promised the same "iron discipline". Yes, that was Mr Brown.

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

Constitutional change: The debate starts here

Constitutional change used to be a marginal pastime but in the aftermath of Scotland's decision it is all important.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 358.

    The J Hoovers Witness
    Credibility or Credulity?

    Is it more than rumour, 'Gordon's sale of Cheap Gold' was 'required', for a system rescue - not just one or two imprudent banks, but the first dominoes?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 357.

    20.Paul Lloyd

    "...Labour? The last Labour government, only they could sell gold at a loss..."

    ===

    Since it has lost $400/oz over the last 9 months, I think you'll find quite a few others have managed that too.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 356.

    352 GF I am not convinced that the bubble was essentially a problem with probity that regulation of the sort you envisage could have solved. Its true that there have been no prosecutions where there should have been, but we need to look at the inherent instability of the free market in debt creation and introduce natural stabilisation that doesnt rely on reactive policy or bankers being honest.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 355.

    How to "restore" Labour's "economic credibility", to eclipse the "credibility" of the Coalition?

    What explains the political superficiality of such a question, from a senior BBC reporter and commentator?

    Responsibility to the public is not escaped by mocking the feet of clay, by Nick or by Stephanie (there WAS an answer to my killer question)

    After the advocates, juries must hear from judges

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 354.

    269 theblamegame. the conservative party is a party for open minded modern people who have a liberal attitude to 21st century life and our democratic society in general. i suppose peope just like you. um, what exactly are your views on same sex marriages?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 353.

    Ed Ball needs to justify why during his advisory capacity the advice he gave was wrong. Is it the power that he misses make him to change his mind. To be quite honest, all politicians are the same. They show that they do care but they only care for themslves. If you trust them they betray you. I think coliation government either Lib- Con or Lib-Lab will keep all politician in check.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 352.

    FBL @ 351
    "Gordo believed in intervention"

    If only. Then when he had his chance at regulation he would have had the courage of his convictions and regulated the financial sector properly. Turning on the spending taps to make up for Tory underinvestment and economic failure in hindsight was an error, but failure to regulate was a complete clanger.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 351.

    335 SM - interventionist in the economic sense - i.e. believing that govt & central banks can/should intervene to stabilise the economy - In the opposing camp there are those free marketers who believe govts should do nothing and those that believe in trying to introduce inherent stabilisation as opposed to reactive intervention. Gordo believed in intervention and got it wrong - big time.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 350.

    #342. s

    Yep, no shortage of EDLs and wackos on the popular pages.
    But good fun in the main.
    Amazing what behaviour blind loyalty can excuse.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 349.

    Gordon Brown's Chief Economic Advisor?
    Thank God that doesn't appear on my CV!
    Alan

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 348.

    The only reason that Ed Balls was given massive air time on the left wing media is that Labour has a credibility problem.

    The BBC's strategy is first to oppose cuts (so Labour can do also), then rubbish every initiative the Tories bring forward and keep any good news out of their daily news as much as possible.

    The trouble is the right wing press reports what is really going on.

  • Comment number 347.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 346.

    @340/342

    A rare opportunity indeed - though a sense of general disillusionment pervades the discussion. Apart from the odd cockeyed optimist.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 345.

    Ed Balls has a script that he speaks to and any deviation from that script or any slight disagreement with what he is saying results in him shaken and off topic. He said nothing at all about what Labour would do and the only spending cut was a miniscule swipe at wealthy pensioners.

    Verdict - definitely could do better and stutter or not he doesn't have any confidence or convictions..

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 344.

    @ 343

    I'm plea-bargaining him down from your 'criminal negligence' to a more reasoned and acceptable 'nothing like the bees knees he believed himself to be.'

    Suggest you take it because if we go to trial it's more than likely (with me as his brief) that he'll get off entirely and walk.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 343.

    335 saga

    'I do a bit of demonising caricature myself sometimes. All good knockabout stuff. '

    Thank goodness for that. I thought you were seriously defending Brown and his record. That's the trouble with t'internet - it's can be difficult to know when people are being serious or just trolling.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 342.

    @ 340

    Well hello there, Blamers.

    I'd say the answer, as regards his BBC blogging career, is a definite yes. More than 'semi', in fact.

    Ah well, sport's more interesting than politics. And you even get to have the old 'what is racism?' debate sometimes courtesy of the likes of Terry and Suarez and 'Submergio' Garcia.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 341.

    After this umpteenth labour relaunch one is left wondering what on earth they do stand for. We know they spend money like it's going out of fashion, but the overriding lust for power stinks. labour are controlling, grasping, interfering and overbearing. they need a long rest (and are getting one)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 340.

    Whilst this rare window of opportunity is available, is Nick semi-retired now?

    Just asking.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 339.

    Andy,

    So you've got it now? Excellent.

    FBL,

    GB interventionist? Maybe. But in the 2 areas where he could have been a superstar for intervening (with TB to prevent us joining the yanks in Iraq; with the City to surpress the bonus culture and consequent malpractice) he very much didn't.

    IR35,

    I share your negativity on QE and low rates. We're getting hooked on the untenable - again.

 

Page 1 of 18

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.