George Osborne: Seven departments agree new cuts


George Osborne: "Everyone that sits around the cabinet table shares the same goal"

Related Stories

George Osborne has reached agreement with seven Whitehall departments on savings he wants made in 2015.

The chancellor said he had found 20% of the £11.5bn he wants to cut spending by in the year from April 2015.

Justice, energy and communities are among the departments agreeing to "significant savings", he said, adding that health, schools and foreign aid would be protected from cuts.

Labour says the government is sticking to policies "that are badly failing".

Mr Osborne told the BBC that no chancellor had got so far in agreeing so many plans so far ahead of a spending review, which is due towards the end of next month.

The spending period in question covers the month before the expected date of the next general election, scheduled for May 2015, and the year after.

The departments that have agreed cuts of between 8% and 10% are: the Ministry of Justice, the Department for Communities and Local Government, the Department for Energy and Climate Change, HM Treasury, the Cabinet Office, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and the Northern Ireland Office.

'On track'

Mr Osborne said the scale of the savings expected was "difficult" but necessary to reduce government borrowing and to ensure money could be found to spend on the "nation's priorities", such as the health service.


  • Ministry of Justice
  • Department for Communities and Local Government
  • Department for Energy and Climate Change
  • HM Treasury
  • Cabinet Office
  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office
  • Northern Ireland Office

"The fact we have got big departments like the Ministry of Justice signed up to 10% reductions shows we are on track and there is a cabinet will behind delivering these necessary savings," Mr Osborne told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Negotiations over savings are continuing with other big departments, such as the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office.

He insisted they would not do anything to put at risk people's safety "at home or abroad", adding that the counter-terrorism budget was among those areas likely to be ring-fenced.

The full financial details will be held back until the spending review is presented to Parliament next month.

But it is understood that, taken together, the savings agreed so far in talks with departments and in previous announcements mean the Treasury still has to find £8bn-£9bn of the £11.5bn to be saved.

Given that health, schools and foreign aid budgets continue to be protected, this means that remaining departments, such as transport, defence, business and the Home Office, are likely to have to make 8% cuts.

There have been reports that some ministers, such as Defence Secretary Philip Hammond, are unhappy about this but Mr Osborne said all his colleagues accepted the need for further savings, and he was "confident" they could be achieved.


Business Secretary Vince Cable: "There are no short cuts here"

Mr Osborne rejected suggestions the cuts would undermine frontline services in areas such as criminal justice, saying major changes were also under way to make the courts and probation services more efficient.

The government, he added, was "trying to improve the quality and productivity of public services while making sure we are not wasting money" and Whitehall "could not be let off the hook" in the push for more efficient government.

He also suggested that there would be no further cuts in welfare in the year in question on top of the "substantial" ones already announced. He also rejected the suggestion of tax increases.

Business Secretary Vince Cable said that Liberal Democrat members of the coalition government had "made it very clear... simply taking more off people at the bottom end of the scale is not the way to proceed".

He told the BBC he had had "very amicable" discussions with Treasury colleagues and would be making the case "that we need to invest more in training and science and innovation and business support if we are going to get the economy going".

Shadow treasury minister Chris Leslie: "The deficit reduction plan has completely stalled"

The government has already announced billions of pounds in cuts for the 2010-15 period, but Labour says its austerity drive has stunted growth and the deficit is rising again.

Chris Leslie, shadow financial secretary to the Treasury, said David Cameron and Mr Osborne's plan was meant to "balance the books by the next election, but their failure on growth and jobs means the deficit is now set to be over £90 billion in 2015".

He said: "That's why the chancellor is now asking for even more spending cuts, with most big departments yet to reach agreement.

"George Osborne should be asking himself what's gone wrong and taking action to get the economy growing strongly between now and 2015. Sadly, he seems set to spend the next two years sticking to policies that are badly failing on living standards, growth and even deficit reduction."


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 825.

    Today's announcement is political spin. A total saving of £11.5bn in 2015 would be 1.5% of the total government spend. So to talk of cuts of 10% is rubbish. Also the seven departments mentioned above spend in total less than the interest of the national debt. In cash terms spending is increasing and in real terms cuts in the five year period of this government will be no more than 2%.

  • rate this

    Comment number 680.

    For those complaining about the £8bn on overseas development aid, perhaps they should look harder at the £55bn spent on debt interest and consider how much this will rise over the coming years. Yes that's interest alone and not paying off the debt.
    It's already as much Defence and Transport combined, and will soon reach Education.

  • rate this

    Comment number 188.

    Surely the £10 Bn pound of overseas aid would be better spent in the UK. The government should be putting our finances in order before before giving OUR taxes away.

  • rate this

    Comment number 161.

    It is time to stop all the ringfencing. Cuts are inevitable. Continuing to borrow £120 billion a year is the way to a real disaster.

    There is no easy way out and its time we faced up to it.

    The real debate we are not having is the size of the public sector and welfare state we can afford, and its much less than we think.

  • rate this

    Comment number 147.

    If you could get just a small percentage of all the tax that is avoided back there would be no need for cuts at all. But making the rich (individuals and corporations) pay even a tiny proportion of their fair shar is out of the question. We'll cut some services, I'm sure nurses can work 27 hours a day, and grandma can wash herself. Save the rich!


Comments 5 of 7


More Politics stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.