Will Ed's soapbox show wash with voters?

Ed Miliband in Chorley

It's back. The politician's soap box.

But look who's following in John Major's footsteps. It's Ed Miliband.

I followed the Labour leader to Chorley, Lancashire, as he sought to show that he was doing politics in a different way. He told me that "we've got to try something" to break down the barriers between politicians and the people.

I asked him about the views of Tony Blair, John Reid, David Blunkett and other senior Labour figures that what he needs to do differently is to start telling the public what Labour's for and not just what it's against.

Visiting a retirement village, the Labour leader spoke of the need to look at how the elderly can be cared for outside expensive hospitals - thus saving the NHS money.

A new commission will look at how to integrate health and social care. How to govern when there is no money to spend is the question Labour finds hardest to answer.

In the last few days he's been told that Labour should seek to reassure voters that the party will, at least at first, spend only as much as its opponents - as Gordon Brown and Tony Blair did before the election of 1997.

'In good time'

Ed Miliband has told the BBC that he believes we "need a different way forward for our economy".

He's also been told that they should state clearly that they plan to increase spending to increase public investment even if it risks a repeat of the "tax bombshell" attack which - along with his soapbox - ensured that John Major was re-elected against the odds in 1992.

The chancellor will set out the coalition's spending plans for the first year after the next election on 26 June in his Spending Review. The Labour leader said he would set out his alternative approach before the next election, when he knew about the state of the economy - it would, he added, be "in good time, honestly".

"Massive increases" in spending on the NHS "won't be available" under the next Labour government.

Mr Miliband's challenge is to turn his talk of "a new economic settlement" into something which is not judged simply by how much he promises to spend.

He will insist that pledges to extend opportunities to the 50% who don't go to university, to get the banking system to support small businesses and greater regulation of the energy and train companies are all examples of just that and show that he is pursuing a different approach not just from the Tories but from New Labour as well.

Mr Miliband also told me that there was no chance of George Galloway returning to the Labour Party and that proposals for a general strike were ridiculous and would not happen.

Nick Robinson, Political editor Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

What's the PM's next move on Iraq? localisation->translate("watch"); ?>

What next for the UK's policy on Iraq and Syria following the death of James Foley?

Watch Nick's report

More on This Story

More from Nick


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 64.

    I'm in my late 40s and have never voted in a national election in my life but if Ed still leading Labour at the next general election, hes got my vote. Why you may ask? Because he looks uncomfortable in a suit and sounds like a pleb, but deep down hes more man than the slick looking/sounding Bliars and Camerons of this world. Go for Ed you da man!! :)

  • rate this

    Comment number 84.

    I like Ed Milliband. He's shrewd enough to know that politicians are at a very low ebb right now, all but disgraced, and he has the balls (ha..) to risk looking silly to make a long-overdue point, and whatever his origins, he's willingly chosen not to be a humourless predator like we've seen too many of lately. As Shakespeare said: Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.

  • rate this

    Comment number 42.


    Your dtick is on the net.

  • rate this

    Comment number 48.

    #27: "Equal Partnership a credible way, all good work really 'to pay'"

    Not in the least credible, when you explain that "Equal Partnership" means that everyone today earning more than median income would have their pay reduced to the median income. Just who would regard it as "credible" that a CEO should be paid the same as an office junior, or a surgeon the same as a hospital cleaner??

  • rate this

    Comment number 56.

    My pc's cannot go on line. They are a conduit.


Comments 5 of 162



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.