G8 ministers condemn North Korea nuclear moves


UK Foreign Secretary William Hague: "If there is a missile test, we will advocate further measures to the UN Security Council"

Related Stories

Foreign ministers from the G8 group of nations have condemned in the "strongest possible terms" North Korea's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programmes.

Tensions have risen on the Korean peninsula in recent weeks.

Meanwhile, a Pentagon spy report concluded "with moderate confidence" that North Korea had the capability to launch nuclear-armed missiles.

But their reliability would be low, the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) said.

It is thought to be the first time that the agency has acknowledged North Korea's capability to produce warheads small enough to fit onto a missile.

The report's conclusion was made public by Republican Doug Lamborn as he questioned senior Pentagon officials about North Korea's nuclear weapons programme during a hearing of the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee.

"DIA assesses with moderate confidence the North currently has nuclear weapons capable of delivery by ballistic missiles, however the reliability will be low," Mr Lamborn said, quoting directly from the report released in March.

The study's conclusion was erroneously marked unclassified, an unnamed US official later told the Associated Press news agency.

'Belligerent approach'


When all was said and done, it was the film actress - Angelina Jolie - who stole the show. And this was not just due to her star quality. The nuclear dialogue with Iran is going nowhere. North Korea is unlikely to be deterred by the strong words coming from the G8 in London. And the Syrian crisis is doubly intractable because the UN Security Council is divided, with Russia and China opposing any strong statements, let alone action. So this was a meeting of the G8 that emphasised the art of the possible.

The measures taken to combat sexual violence in armed conflict were thrust into the limelight. Many will say that a scourge that has afflicted societies from the Balkans to Africa and now the Middle East merits this kind of attention. But its billing at this G8 is a measure not just of its importance but of the intractability of so many of the other issues facing the premier league of world diplomats.

In a news conference after the G8 summit, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said that "if the DPRK [North Korea] conducts another missile launch or nuclear test, we have committed ourselves to take further significant measures".

The Group of Eight nations comprises the US, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Canada and Russia.

Britain currently holds the rotating chairmanship of the G8 and the talks are a prelude to the annual G8 summit later this year in Northern Ireland.

Correspondents say Japan, present at the talks, had been looking for a strong statement of solidarity over Korea.

North Korea has been making bellicose threats against South Korea, Japan and US bases in the region.

Mr Hague said the ministers condemned North Korea's "current aggressive rhetoric", saying it would "only serve further to isolate the DPRK".

Later on Thursday, US President Barack Obama also called on North Korea to end its "belligerent approach".

He added that the US would take "all necessary steps" to protect its people, while stressing that "nobody wants to see a conflict on the Korean peninsula".

Musudan missile

  • The Musudan, also known as the Nodong-B or the Taepodong-X, is an intermediate-range ballistic missile. Its likely targets are Okinawa, Japan, and US bases in the Pacific
  • Range estimates differ dramatically. Israeli intelligence suggests 2,500km, while the US Missile Defense Agency estimates 3,200km; other sources put the upper limit at 4,000km
  • These differences are due in large part to the fact that the missile has never been tested publicly, according to the Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Its payload is also unknown

BBC diplomatic correspondent James Robbins says ministers agree that the combination of warlike threats from North Korea and preparations for new missile tests amount to dangerous provocation.

South Korea has raised its alert level amid indications that the North is preparing for a missile test.

Pyongyang has moved two Musudan ballistic missiles to its east coast. Estimates of their range vary, but some suggest it could travel 4,000km (2,500 miles).

A missile therefore has the potential of hitting US bases on Guam, although it is not known whether the Musudan has been tested before.

North Korea has increased its fiery rhetoric following fresh UN sanctions imposed after its third nuclear test and joint military manoeuvres by the US and South Korea.

The North says it will restart a mothballed nuclear reactor, has shut an emergency military hotline to the South and has urged countries to withdraw diplomatic staff, saying it cannot now guarantee their safety.

However, in the past few days North Korea's media appear to be in more of a holiday mood, due to the approach of Kim Il-sung's birthday on Monday - a potential launch date for a new missile test.

North Korea has been making bellicose threats against South Korea, Japan and US bases in the region

Humanitarian assistance

The G8 ministers also pledged to work to end sexual violence in conflict, calling for urgent action to address "comprehensively" the "culture of impunity" in conflict zones.

Mr Hague said he was "delighted" that ministers had agreed on plans to tackle "the horrific use of rape and sexual violence as a weapon of war in conflicts around the globe", which he described as "one of the greatest and most persistent injustices in the world".

Mr Hague said the G8 had "committed to the development of a comprehensive international protocol on the investigation and documentation of rape and sexual violence in conflict".

The UK announced £10m ($15.4m) of fresh funding to supports efforts against sexual violence.

In a statement welcoming the moves, the Save the Children charity said: "The majority of victims of sexual violence, especially in conflict situations, are children so we must ensure these funds reach the most vulnerable children as a matter of urgency."

Key North Korean anniversaries

  • 11 April - Kim Jong-un elected first secretary of the Workers' Party, and late father Kim Jong-il named General Secretary for Eternity in 2012
  • 13 April - Kim Jong-un appointed first chairman of the National Defence Commission in 2012
  • 15 April - Birthday of state founder Kim Il-sung (1912-1994)

The UN special envoy for refugees, Angelina Jolie, said that wartime rape should not be regarded as inevitable, saying: "It can be prevented and must be confronted.

"Finally we have some hope to offer victims."

On Syria, Mr Hague admitted that "the world has failed so far in its responsibilities, and continues to do so", adding that divisions over the conflict continue.

"This is on track to be the biggest humanitarian catastrophe of the 21st Century so far," he added.

Ministers called for greater humanitarian assistance to Syrians affected by the conflict.

They affirmed their support for a "political transition", but did not mention any punitive measures against President Bashar al-Assad.

Fresh evidence of links between some opposition fighters and al-Qaeda has made it even harder for governments to decide a course of action, correspondents say.

G8 ministers met Syrian opposition figures on Wednesday on the sidelines of the two-day forum.

Actress Angelina Jolie, the UN's Zainab Hawa Bangura and UK Foreign Secretary William Hague on the bid to end sexual violence

More than 60,000 people are estimated to have died since the uprising against the government of President Assad began in March 2011.

The London talks were also the first chance for G8 ministers to discuss face-to-face the failure of last week's meeting in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on curbing Iran's nuclear programme.

Mr Hague called that failure "disappointing".

"We will continue to work with the twin-track approach of sanctions and negotiations, but... the window of diplomacy will not remain open forever," he went on.

Tehran says it only wants to produce energy but the US and its allies suspect it is trying to develop a nuclear weapon.

Burma, Somalia and cyber-security were also topics on the agenda.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 259.

    What is this evidence that the Syrian rebels have links to al-Qaeda? Did they conveniently find a terrorist's iphone on a bus with his diary appointments and address book? Or is someone telling porkies?

  • rate this

    Comment number 258.

    "most are stupid"?
    Not given a chance

    Who truly unable to grasp fairness?
    Not many, even if empathy weaker

    Knowing from history, need to make democracy work, vital to teach meaning, "Of, For, By the EQUAL People", in essence 'representative' decision-making, at every level impacting 'Man & God', present & future

    Equal in income-share freedom, who will promote & consume "trash culture"?

  • rate this

    Comment number 257.

    @247. omegaman

    The US government wanted a reason to start wars in the Middle East in order to secure oil for there over-consuming lifestyles and long winded story about a mega-terrorist based in a cave lair somewhere in the Afgan mountains, that had the ability to get round all US security measures by sending a few letters to other pro-terror peoples - sounded like the most plausible excuse!

  • rate this

    Comment number 256.

    It suits the west to allow (and even support) the Arab countries back into the stone age. Have a 'revolution', get rid of the secular gov, and replace with a religious (Islamic) order. Consider, Afganistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and others. Who next?

  • Comment number 255.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this

    Comment number 254.

    Can anybody tell me who's the leader in this bunch of foreign ministers? Is there one charismatic figure that can make a positive change? Is there one decision maker? ... People are floating around in confusion; which is understandable in this period of uncertainty (and I agree with EC1 below, they need to be led). But how can elected leaders be so confused and confusing? Even O'Brama is clueless!

  • rate this

    Comment number 253.

    We should keep well away from Syria - now that we have had confirmation that the rebels are linked to Al Qaeda we really do need to walk away from this one.
    You can't take sides in this one: a harsh ruler on one side and terrorists on the other. I certainly don't want the weapons from my country used be these fighters.

    As for NK... who knows what they'll do?
    'Tis a silly place.

  • rate this

    Comment number 252.

    Dealing with rogue states has never been easy. G-8 leaders have to bite the bullet! For too long dictators have given short shrift to pleas for common-sense.Tensions in Syria, North Korea have reached fever pitch. How long does one have to wait before strong effective action is taken? Diplomacy has failed in resolving issues. A soft approach has not paid dividends. RESOLUTE ACTION IS NECESSARY!

  • rate this

    Comment number 251.

    Please do not go near Syria with arms yes let gave medical suppiers if and when we are asked. We will not be thank by whoever wins this civil war. Have we not learn yet. As for NK its time China steps up to the mark and tell them or even threat them if that what it takes.

  • rate this

    Comment number 250.

    Day 1: Leader of Syria's jihadist Al-Nusra Front pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri. Is this the direction the west wants Syria to take? To me, it bolsters contention by Assad that Syria is fighting "terrorists" who want to impose an Islamic state. Meanwhile, US & EU are "aid", distributing food, medical supplies to Free Syrian Army - allegedly everything short of arms.

  • rate this

    Comment number 249.

    It was pretty swiftly swept under the carpet, but haven't the "rebels" been using chemical weapons? Didn't we threaten action against the Syrian government if they dared to use chemical weapons? Why is it ok that Al Qua... sorry, the "rebels" use them?
    I must say I'm very confused!

  • rate this

    Comment number 248.

    237 Barry. If it's like all the rest of Pilger's "balanced" journalism, I think I can summarise "It's all the fault of the CIA and for the benefit of the US military-industrial complex, funded by international zionist bankerism" Dito anything by Tariq Ali, "Gorgeous" George (Saddam, I salute your strength, your courage, your indefatigability) Galloway et al.

  • rate this

    Comment number 247.

    Apologies for the tangent to this topic, but I guess that my question is linked as it seems to me that we are increasingly becoming entrenched in what feels like another world war. My question is this. Does anyone out there know definitively what Bin Ladens rationale, or reason was for the twin towers episode? What focused him to commit such destruction? Was he simply a religious lunatic?

  • rate this

    Comment number 246.

    We invade countries because Al Qaeda/extremists are taking a foothold but then supply them with arms in other countries.

    Crazy, I just don't get it - they'll never be 'friends' to us even if we 'help', they hate our mere infidel existance on the same planet as them.

  • rate this

    Comment number 245.


    Why are we aligning ourselves with the so called Syrian opposition?


    I think it might be because if you translate the full Arabic for the governing party, it has the word "socialist" in it, like that of late in Iraq, Libya etc.

    It's all that's needed for some people, especially Americans.

  • rate this

    Comment number 244.

    NK will not go to war.
    Syria has a civil war, we should mediate/ keep out not take sides.
    Horsemeat will not kill you, but news of it is everywhere.
    Meanwhile the rice we buy from China and India is contaminated with extreme levels of lead and arsenic. That's what will kill us. That is what we should be talking about. Do you not see you are being distracted?

  • rate this

    Comment number 243.

    Double standard of the G8 how long did it take them to intervene and cause Saddam and Gaddafi to be murdered, why are the seating and watching why Assad trows the region into a den for chaos and anarchy. the "high' agenda after so many life lost is just a mockery.

  • rate this

    Comment number 242.

    The syrian rebels are too fragmented to arm en masse. You would end up with even more heavily armed islamists who will move on to the next conflict after Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria. Much as many people would like a moderate regime to take over in Damascus, moderate people don't tend to take part in armed insurrections.

  • rate this

    Comment number 241.

    The threat to a nuclear giant US from a lilliputian North Korea can be snuffed off by US by a bomb that can wipe off NK in a jiffy.. As for Syria, there appears to be a mishmash. The G8 should realize that the Assad regime is democratically elected by the Syrians. The militants are smuggled in by the Sunni Arab nations and the Al Qaeda who hate the Shiite Syria. It is like helping Al Qaeda

  • Comment number 240.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?


Page 38 of 50


More World stories



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.