An elaborate ritual
Reader Dan Filson asks about the Public Bill Committee on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill… it is indeed continuing this week, so I thought I'd offer an update on its procedings so far.
Nothing in the bill has been changed.
Nothing at all.
Zip. Nada.
The bill cleared the Commons at second reading on 5 February 2013
There was one big set-piece battle when the the three dissenters on the committee, David Burrowes, Tim Loughton and Jim Shannon, attempted to fillet out the principle of same sex marriage, enshrined in Clause 1 of the bill, and were voted down.
Since then, the pattern of the proceedings has mostly been that they put down amendments on issues around conscientious objection to same sex marriage - for example, to safeguard teachers or registrars from being punished in any way if they voice religious objections. The two ministers present, Hugh Robertson and Helen Grant insist that the protections already written into the bill are sufficient, and the amendments are usually withdrawn, even if the dissenters are unconvinced.
Occasionally there are divisions (votes to you and me) which the government wins.
From time to time, Labour put down amendments, for example, on what happens when a church which does allow same sex marriage operates in premises on loan from another church which doesn't, or to make it easier for the Church in Wales to opt into same sex marriage, if it chooses to.
The first of these was forced to a vote, and defeated, with the two Lib Dems on the committee, Stephen Williams and Steve Gilbert, abstaining and the dissenters supporting the government. Occasionally there are loud snorts and sotto voce comments from Labour's Chris Bryant. Sometimes Tim Loughton seems a little irritable.
In short, it's all a bit of a ritual. The dissenters dissent and the supporters support, and the whole thing is as mannered as a minuet danced at the court of Louis XVI.
Issues and arguments are being lined up, but much of the activity is really preparation for a rematch when the bill goes back to the floor of the Commons for report stage. And that may not be until after the Queen's Speech, in early May.
In the meantime, the only changes likely to be made at the bill committee are ones offered up by the government itself, if they happen on some technical issue that needs to be addressed.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~06~RS~)




US Taliban move prompts Afghan ire
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Please STOP
On the move in Mumbai
Fast Track
Comment number 4.
sawb8th March 2013 - 7:27
So the government are (at present) having a reasonably easy time of with the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill in Committee, but why do I get the feeling that things will hot up come Report stage and 3rd reading?
Link to this (Comment number 4)
Comment number 3.
JP7th March 2013 - 18:30
Irrelevant minority issue whilst Rome burns
Complete waste of pixels.
Oops.........
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 2.
RW497th March 2013 - 14:57
Chris Bryant does himself and his causes no favours at all by his preposterous behaviour. No wonder he's known as 'Mr. Grandstand'.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 1.
Little_Old_Me7th March 2013 - 11:44
And still the bigots claim marriage is man/woman and/or a christian thing.....
....even though for roughly 500 years after arriving in the UK christian marriage wasn't even recognised in law but hand fasting was......
....hand fasting having existed for centuaries before christianity pitched up on our shores.......
Link to this (Comment number 1)