Budget 2013: No tax break for married couples

Wedding rings Tory backbenchers are linking tax breaks for married couples to plans for gay marriage

Related Stories

The government will not introduce a tax break for married couples in next month's Budget, it has emerged.

There had been speculation David Cameron would bring in the measure to appease Tory backbenchers who are opposed to gay marriage.

However legislation is expected to be introduced before 2015 to allow couples to transfer part of their personal tax allowance to their partner.

The Commons will vote next week on the government's plans for gay marriage.

The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill would enable same-sex couples to get married in both civil and religious ceremonies, where a religious institution had formally consented, in England and Wales.

It would also allow couples who have previously entered into civil partnerships to convert their relationship into a marriage.

BBC political correspondent Vicki Young said the tax news had to be seen in the context of the highly contentious vote on gay marriage, with dozens of Tory MPs opposed to it.

The two issues are linked in their minds because they say it is about Mr Cameron's priorities, putting gay marriage ahead of married tax breaks.

Some of them say it will increase anger and consternation on the backbenches, our correspondent added.

'Serious unrest'


The decision not to include a tax break for married couples in next month's budget has to be seen within the context of Tuesday's vote on same-sex marriage.

Introducing the tax break remains part of the coalition programme, but there had been suggestions that David Cameron would introduce them earlier than planned.

The idea was that the move would pacify MPs who complain that gay marriage, which wasn't in the last Tory manifesto, is being prioritised over the tax break, which was.

Strictly, this shouldn't be seen as a potential rebellion, as Conservative MPs are expected to be offered a free vote on Tuesday. But David Cameron is a vocal supporter of gay marriage.

So, to have a significant number of his MPs (one backbencher today suggested more than half) voting against him would be embarrassing.

After a week which has been full of talk of a possible leadership challenge from the backbenches, the prime minister's relationship with some sections of his party looks in need of some marriage guidance.

The tax measure is in the coalition agreement but Liberal Democrat MPs would be allowed to abstain.

It is expected that one stay-at-home member of a married couple or civil partnership would be able to move £750 of their tax-free personal allowance to their working partner, reducing their tax bill. This would be worth about £150 a year to basic-rate taxpayers.

A senior government source said: "It won't be in the Budget but it will be in this parliament. This Budget obviously, with all that has happened in recent weeks and months, will be very much focused on growth in the economy".

According to the Times, the issue of gay marriage is causing Conservative members to leave the party in significant numbers.

The newspaper claimed that as many as 100 members had revoked their affiliation in some constituencies.

Tory MP David Burrowes is quoted as saying: "There's serious unrest in the grassroots. You cannot avoid the fact that the troops are unhappy. People are drifting away."

'Definition of marriage'

He told the BBC that had the government introduced the tax breaks, it may have "softened the blow" of plans to legalise same-sex marriage, but that it would not have been a "clinch for any deal".

He also said it was an "issue of finance" as to why tax breaks for married couples were not being introduced in the forthcoming Budget, but said it was not "a case of if, it's a case of when" they would eventually come in.

"It is something that should be a priority, not just because it's a commitment in our manifesto and a coalition agreement, but also because it's where we can particularly support the poorest of families by ensuring there is a tax allowance for married couples with children."

He also said: "Civil partnerships, quite rightly, give legal rights for same-sex couples. That doesn't mean we should change the definition of marriage, which is between a man and a woman."

Conservative MP Peter Bone is opposed to gay marriage and believes the vote shows the coalition has got its priorities wrong.

"I absolutely understand there could be a debate about it but as no party had it in their manifesto we shouldn't be pushing it through now," he said.

"I'm always being told we can't get any measures through because it's not in the coalition agreement."

But a Tory supporter of the bill, Jane Ellison, says the policy is winning the party new support.

"A great many people, a great many young people support this measure and their voice is really important in politics too," she told the BBC.

Matthew Sinclair, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the UK's "complicated tax system makes it harder for people to start a family" and can discriminate against married couples.

"Introducing an allowance that lets families share some of their personal allowance would help tackle poverty and reduce the perverse disincentives created by our dysfunctional tax code."

Conservative MPs will get a free vote on whether to introduce same-sex marriage. Labour and the Lib Dems have backed the idea.

The bill will allow religious organisations to offer same-sex marriages but Equalities Minister Maria Miller has said no religious organisation "will ever be forced to conduct marriages for same-sex couples".


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 344.

    It's unfair that my co-habiting unemployed partner cannot claim housing benefit or council tax relief due to my income and at the same time I do not get tax relief for supporting her. It's squeezing from both sides. If benefits rely on household income, then we should be able to combine our tax allowances into a household or couples allowance regardless of whether married or not.

  • rate this

    Comment number 230.

    I'll not bother then....despite being in a 10 yr relationship. They say you marry for love but if you're in love you don't NEED to marry do you? Seriously what's in it for me? I don't do jewellery, I hate being the centre of attention, I earn more than my man and have a better pension. Do I need a piece of paper to prove to others that we love each other? Give me a tax break and I'll consider it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 228.

    A balanced system for household income would be good. We have some friends in very similar circumstances with a similar combined income. The only difference is, they are both earning about the same and both on standard tax. Whereas, my wife is a poorly paid classroom assistant l and I am a senior engineer, paying higher rate tax. Yet as a family we pay considerably more tax than our friends.

  • rate this

    Comment number 149.

    How about a fair tax for everyone. We could start with no one paying tax until their salary, pension and investments amount to £12,000, we could then do away with 'credits' as we would be allowed to keep much more of our own money. Quite a number of low income people would be taken out of the taxable income which is totally fair, we all would be better off.

  • rate this

    Comment number 85.

    I may be hugely unpopular in saying this, but as a married woman I don't agree with such a thing as a tax break just for being married. Why do I deserve it more than a committed couple, raising children, who just happen to not have signed a bit of paper. Or a hard working, rent/bill/tax paying single person? I don't. Marriage is a choice, in this day and age it shouldn't equal special privileges.


Comments 5 of 7


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.