Cameron's referendum gamble

 

No speech by the prime minister has been agonised over for so long. None will be of such consequence. None will be based on a bigger gamble.

Today could mark a first step on a road leading to Britain's exit from Europe 45 years after we first joined. David Cameron couldn't have been clearer that that is not his intention nor his belief about what will happen next. However, what he declared today was that he was no longer in charge. The people are to have the final say.

Even without the in-out referendum pledge this would have been a significant speech.

It was a plea for Europe to change itself for its own sake - abandoning the shared goal of "ever-closer union", accepting that the single market rather than the single currency was the key shared ambition and agreeing that powers should be returned to member states not inexorably transferred to Brussels.

It was also a plea to Europe to change so that the UK could stay a member and settle the issue that has caused so many prime ministers so many problems.

Beyond the call for "a more flexible, adaptable and open European Union" there was very little about what changes the prime minister will argue for. In other words we do not know what the new settlement he is seeking to negotiate would look like.

David Cameron says that if he can secure it he will campaign heart and soul for a yes (ie: In ) vote. He was asked whether that meant he would vote No if he didn't get what he wanted - whatever that is. He dodged the question. I suggested to him that he wanted people to believe that's what he would do but was scared to say so. He dodged the question again.

This is a gamble just like the one he took when making his "big, open and generous" offer to form a coalition in the aftermath of his failure to win the 2010 election outright.

He is gambling that his referendum promise will calm rather than stir the fury of Eurosceptics both inside and outside his party, that he can persuade 26 other European leaders to give the UK the deal he wants and that voters will then choose to back it.

If he pulls it off he will restore party unity, see off the threat of UKIP, put Labour on the back foot and secure a relationship with the EU which is no longer a political nightmare for him and his party.

If he doesn't the name Cameron will be added to those of Wilson, Thatcher and Major - those whose premierships were destroyed by that most toxic issue in politics - Europe.

 
Nick Robinson, Political editor Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

Miliband on Israel and plan to be PM

Labour leader Ed Miliband speaks to the BBC's Nick Robinson about delving into his past on a trip to Israel - and planning for a future as UK prime minister.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +45

    Comment number 217.

    Has anyone actually read through the speech? There's an awful lot of 'ifs' in it before we even get to the referendum. I can't help but think he's just trying to cut off support for UKIP.

  • rate this
    +40

    Comment number 8.

    Giving people their say shouldn't be viewed as a gamble - it's called democracy.

    Whatever we vote for, yes or no, is the right answer!

  • rate this
    +35

    Comment number 26.

    It's about time!
    To all those opposed to a referenfum: what is wrong with the people having a say in where this country goes? Are you happy to have politicians 'know what's best for us'?
    We are a democracy. The idea that the people should vote on this issue is not in the least bit alien to that concept.
    The EU is headed for 'ever closer union', what is wrong in us being asked about that?

  • rate this
    +30

    Comment number 64.

    The mistake of the EU has been to invite too many of the poorer European countries into its fold and to allow easy immigration between member countries. It has become too unwieldy, too bureaucratic and too expensive to maintain. A potentially good idea has become a nightmare, with bailouts, a tide of economic migrants and loss of sovereign judicial powers. Cameron is right, let UK voters decide.

  • rate this
    +24

    Comment number 87.

    If the Scots vote for independence in 2014, I assume that they won't be taking part in a vote on whether the rest of us will be staying in the EU - or will they if formal independence has not been reached by then? We could have the scenario of the Scots negotiating to leave the UK, the rump of the UK negotiating to leave the EU and the Scots negotiating to get back into the EU!

 

Comments 5 of 614

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.