Leveson Inquiry: Will Cameron regret Leveson?
He set up the Leveson Inquiry.
He said there could be no more last chances for the press.
He said the test of any change was whether it satisfied the victims.
And yet David Cameron has rejected the central recommendation of Lord Justice Leveson - that a new law is essential to underpin a new stronger press regulator.
Minutes after he did so the prime minister swapped places and a smile with his deputy Nick Clegg who took the unprecedented step of making his own separate Commons statement saying that only a new law could guarantee the independence of any regulator.
Given that that is the view shared by the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, there is now in theory a pro-Leveson parliamentary majority made up of Labour, Liberal Democrat and dozens of Tory MPs who don't agree with their leader.
However, even though they could defeat and embarrass David Cameron that coalition could not force a new press law into being (since it is the government that controls the parliamentary time needed to pass legislation).
The prime minister knows he has given his opponents yet another stick to beat him with. He also knows, however, that the press are firmly on his side.
His hope is that the pressure he is under will be relieved when/if newspapers swiftly set up the new regulator they've been working on - adapted to meet the principles set out in today's report. One of his allies told me "It will happen".
Until it does, David Cameron will have plenty of time to wonder if picking up the phone to Sir Brian Leveson was really such a good idea.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~41~RS~)




US Taliban move prompts Afghan ire
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Coming out in Yemen
Transport in transit
Fast Track
Comment number 180.
LandOfTheMushroomPeople30th November 2012 - 23:48
I usually make a hys comment on most stuff but this Levvyson thing is so pointless I have nothing to say
Can't even be bothered taking the mickey it's so pointless
Can they not just put this enquiry onto an x-factor type show and everyone has a vote at the end as to whether they give a hoot
Link to this (Comment number 180)
Comment number 179.
Steve_M-H30th November 2012 - 23:25
174
With the exception of FoI, yes, thats exactly what they mean.
Link to this (Comment number 179)
Comment number 178.
meninwhitecoats30th November 2012 - 23:08
Strictly@162
Agree - maintaining the status quo is not an option, they will revert to type as soon as the spotlight moves on.
Link to this (Comment number 178)
Comment number 177.
Jason30th November 2012 - 22:58
Having watch the Daily Politics on Friday, I think Milliband may be regretting Leveson. The point was made that Milliband said that he agreed with all of Leveson. This means that he accepts that there is no evidence of collusion between Hunt and Murdoch. There were other points as well. Milliband could end up looking like an opportunist in his response.
Link to this (Comment number 177)
Comment number 176.
edwil30th November 2012 - 21:31
Why is Cameron against the Leveson Report. Could it be because
he feels the Press would savage, further, his tattered image ??
Self protectionism.
Link to this (Comment number 176)
Comments 5 of 180