New Archbishop backs payday loan amendment

The Bishop of Durham

After last week's mauling on the Justice and Security Bill, is the Government cruisin' for another Lords bruisin' on payday loans?

Peers are spending a couple of days next week on the Report Stage of the Financial Services Bill, and a Labour amendment which would cap the interest payable on payday loans has just attracted the signature of the Bishop of Durham and Archbishop of Canterbury-to-be - Justin Welby. Labour clearly regard his support on this as quite a coup.

The Rt Rev Prelate (to lapse into Lords-speak) is both the head-in-waiting of the Church of England, and a member of the powerful Parliamentary Banking Commission, where his put-down to the chancellor, at a hearing this week, about his army of straw men, was relished by observers.

Even before his promotion was announced, he was clearly gathering admirers and influence. Now, Amendment 114d, from the Labour Peer, Parry Mitchell, has been signed both by Bishop Welby (in his current guise as Bishop of Durham) and by the Crossbencher, Lady Howe, an active campaigner on an impressive range of issues - and, between them they may well attract vital crossbench support.

The government has already been defeated on the Financial Services Bill , mostly as a result of Tory no-shows, on a procedural vote. And after the kicking they received last week, some observers are beginning to wonder if the Coalition is beginning to splinter, or at least suffer a midlife-itis, on the red benches of Their Lordships' House.

The ever-helpful Constitution Unit have broken down the voting on last week's three Government Justice and Security defeats in the Lords, and the voting pattern was consistent across all three defeats - 50 plus Crossbenchers and 50 plus Liberal Democrats and 2 or 3 Conservatives, voting against the Government - many more than voted with it. And, incidentally no Bishops voted with the Government in any of the three votes.

The result was substantial majorities against the Government line - 105, 99 and 87.

I don't know if the Financial Services amendments will attract the same level of support - but if Conservative and Lib Dem peers add their signatures to them, then the Government whips will have cause to worry.

Again. Regular defeats in the Lords, on substantial issues, are becoming a constant irritant in the coalition, particularly since a key ingredient in those defeats is almost always the defection of Lib Dem peers.

None of the issues so far have been at the heart of the Government's programme, but the votes do seem to home in on certain faultlines around civil liberties and market regulation.

This makes the inconvenience of defeat all the more annoying for ministers, especially where they have had to persuade MPs to grit their teeth and vote for uncomfortable causes in the Commons, only to see Peers upset the apple cart.

Mark D'Arcy Article written by Mark D'Arcy Mark D'Arcy Parliamentary correspondent

Week ahead in the European Parliament

MEPs in Strasbourg are holding the first plenary session since the summer recess.

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    House of Lords is a disgrace. I do not understand the need for it. I certainly know the way people get into it is a joke.

    House of Commons should use the parliament act more often.

  • rate this

    Comment number 11.

    everyone has the ability to borrow but not the ability to return what they borrowed - hence you can just as easily say nobody has the right to lend but if they do so it is at their own risk since it is possible to live life without borrowing or lending some people ask some people give and friends can share anything they want to agree to and through killing demand you can get around unsavory people

  • rate this

    Comment number 13.

    All industry is subject to supply and demand and the slaves to it and what is not commonly in demand will be selected out of the market. dies. The results of the vote are entirely dependent upon the prevailing attitude of the people involved - the majority - and you factor in the time it takes for the decisions they take to have any effect, that is the fuse that the industy has. Before exploding.

  • rate this

    Comment number 16.

    While I too have some sympathy with those who need these loans I must balance that with sympathy for those organisations who take a significantly higher risk in loaning in this environment. We've recently condemmed those who've loaned and lost and now we condem those who provide a high risk service. Properly regulated there should be little problem ... and publicity of the risks abounds

  • rate this

    Comment number 17.

    I’ve no doubt that a large percentage of payday loan customers don’t have too much complaint – people aren’t stupid, and the costs of payday lending are common knowledge…. Take the money, pay it back, moan about how much it cost, repeat.
    [Unsuitable/Broken URL removed by Moderator]


Comments 5 of 26



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.