Learning the lessons of Savile

 

Never was there clearer evidence of the difference the Savile scandal has made to attitudes to allegations of child abuse.

The prime minister has broken into a trip to the Gulf to announce an investigation into allegations that abuse at a North Wales children's home went much further than an official inquiry revealed and may have involved a senior Conservative from the Thatcher era.

One source close to the prime minister told me "it reeks".

He was referring to allegations, first aired last Friday on the BBC's Newsnight, which suggested that victims of abuse at the Bryn Estyn children's home in the 1970s and 1980s were told by the police and the Waterhouse Inquiry that there was no evidence to back their recollection of who had abused them and, therefore, no reason to pursue their allegations further.

That is why Downing Street is aiming to appoint a judge to examine both "the scope and conduct of the original inquiry" into child abuse - to ask, in other words, whether the inquiry's terms of reference were set too narrowly to allow consideration of child abuse beyond one children's home in North Wales and whether allegations made by victims against public figures were wrongly excluded from the final report.

Number 10 is trying to learn from the BBC's handling of allegations about Jimmy Savile and, in particular, what is now widely seen to have been the mistake of insisting that the serious allegations were best dealt with by the police alone.

It is aware of the potential political damage of any perceived cover-up given that the allegations centre on a one-time senior Conservative - albeit someone who no longer has any involvement in frontline politics - and given that the Waterhouse Inquiry was set up by William Hague in 1996 when he was Secretary of State for Wales in John Major's government.

I am told that Number 10 have seen no evidence that is not already in the public domain. However, the fear amongst the prime minister's advisers is that children's homes may have been used by paedophiles who were prominent public figures and the authorities may have failed to investigate this properly.

PS: The BBC, in line with many other news organisations, has chosen not to name the politician at the centre of these very serious allegations as we have no evidence beyond the interviews aired on Newsnight on Friday.

Correction 10 November 2012: The BBC has apologised unreservedly for broadcasting a report on Newsnight on 2 November over allegations of child abuse which transpired to have involved a case of mistaken identity. As a result the video of the original report has been removed from the website. More details can be found here.

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

UKIP - power struggle, not soap opera

All the bizarre news stories that have emerged from UKIP in recent days reflect a power struggle within a party that aspires to hold the balance of power after the next election.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 97.

    How come its ok for Freddie Starr and Gary Gliter to be named by the press but not the MP/'s?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 96.

    The report by John Jillings was suppressed, the subsequent Waterhouse report was circumscribed with little subsequent police follow up, arguably cover up. Edinburgh/ Dunblane, Rotherham/Rochdale/Yorkshire and Jersey and Operation Ore were all suppressed in unsatisfactory circumstances. This latest enquiry appears predominantly procedural and limited to Wales - hard to disagree with Tom Watson

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 95.

    Saga#77/87

    Missed 77 I'm afraid.

    It's concerning that the hyperbole about the genuine concerns raised will result in people holding back. A mate helped out an old dear in distress & felt obliged to protest that his well intentioned actions had involved nothing inappropriate.- how sad is that?

    We need to keep enough perspective to distinguish between a helping hand and institutionalised abuse.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 94.

    You are laying a bit of a false trail there Nick- why? Not only one person has laid these claims against the 'one time' senior conservative- and this person, unlike Saville, is able to speak for themselves- in fact has said that he will sue one of the people claiming to be a victim. Is it that you just can't believe it yourself having spent professional time interviewing this individual?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 93.

    89.kcband8
    Re:'Thatcher era'

    No doubt this description will be used for all dubious activities during that period.
    Can we expect a similar term to portray irresponsible borrowing, report sexing up, warmongering, or racial abuse, during the Blair/Brown ERA?

    +
    Good point
    I've got a term under the acronym B.E.L.F.(era)

    Biggoted Europhile Labour/Liberal Fascist (era)

    It's 'a belf-er'

 

Comments 5 of 97

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.