Will David Cameron ape Tarzan?

Lord Heseltine Lord Heseltine said the report was "one man's vision"

"The message I keep hearing is that the UK does not have a strategy for growth and wealth creation."

That one sentence alone is a gift to Ed Miliband particularly on the day of Prime Minister's Questions. All the more surprising then that it comes from a report commissioned by the government and written by a former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister. This is a war cry from the man whose golden locks and virtuoso performances earned him the nickname Tarzan.

Lord Heseltine insists that he is simply urging his friends in government to go further and faster - not so much a critic, as a coach or an adviser to a top athlete or business leader who wants to improve his or her performance

It is true that he is not backing Labour's call for more spending and borrowing. Nor is he backing calls from the Tory right for an assault on regulation and tax cuts. Instead, the man who once boasted to the Conservative conference that he would "intervene before breakfast, lunch and dinner" to use the power of government to help business is now calling on the prime minister to do exactly that and to restructure the British state to achieve it.

In the short term - and providing more lines for the government's critics to deploy - Hezza calls on ministers to come off the fence about building a new hub airport and to resolve the simmering row between ministers over future energy policy. This is an echo of what any business organisation would tell you.

More surprising and more challenging is the Heseltine prescription for a wholesale re-organisation of the way government works for business. The man who dubbed himself President of the Board of Trade in the 1990s now wants the prime minister to head a new national board - or Growth Council - to force the government to focus on delivering growth.

A new minister - perhaps Lord Deighton, newly appointed to the Treasury having finished building the infrastructure of the Games - would be specifically assigned to the job.

So far, so much Whitehall tinkering. What is more dramatic is Hezza's call to re-organise the British state along German lines.

Power and money to control billions of funds should, he says, be taken from competing Whitehall baronies and given to the newly created but currently under-powered Local Enterprise Partnerships to spend on their local priorities instead.

Business should be forced or cajoled to join and be represented by newly beefed-up Teutonic Chambers of Commerce. English local government should be re-organised on Welsh and Scottish lines - producing single unitary councils in England in place of the current hotch potch of districts, counties, metropolitan and unitary councils.

The vision embodied in this report is that government should produce a national plan for growth - picking winning sectors if not individual firms it wants to back - and every local area should have a legal requirement to produce their own plan which fits in with it.

Lord Heseltine has written not so much a single report as a potted autobiography of his time in government. He is calling on David Cameron to adopt the approach of top down control, partnership between government and business, but above all single minded focus, energy and impatience which helped create the London docklands and tried, with much less success, to revive Liverpool.

The question today then is not whether David Cameron and George Osborne welcome this report or insist that they knew what they were doing when they commissioned it. It is not whether they talk of adopting his idea of this Whitehall committee or that devolution of funds.

It is whether these two children of Thatcher can ever see themselves as bosses of UK PLC rather than politicians whose job it is to limit regulation, taxes and other annoyances to business. Hezza says they have backed him all the way and that what matters is what ministers think and not the Whitehall institutions they lead.

So, the question today is whether Cameron can ever really become Tarzan - and whether his party would let him?

Nick Robinson, Political editor Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

What's the PM's next move on Iraq? localisation->translate("watch"); ?>

What next for the UK's policy on Iraq and Syria following the death of James Foley?

Watch Nick's report

More on This Story

More from Nick


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 128.

    126.Idont Believeit

    Well it has got you well & truly rattled!

    'Labour had no 'real GDP per capita growth'
    Do you need telling again?
    Labour had no 'real GDP per capita growth'
    Labour flat-lined on the best GDP measure as is 'real GDP per capita'
    Many don't understand the significance of the figures

  • rate this

    Comment number 127.


    Something very similar to the Tories was in power before the credit crunch. Now those same people pose as anti-Tories.

    What is irritating is that these assorted idiots are not focussing on what needs to be done but on playing their silly games.

    The economy needs to rebalance fast from busted banks and the bloated state into wealth and value creation. What are they doing about that? Nothing!

  • rate this

    Comment number 126.

    Take deep breaths - you'll do yourself harm. Repeating something over and over again doesn't really count as an argument in its favour. Could be true, but you don't give a source.
    However, if it was true it kills the Tory Story stone dead. No growth, no boom, equals less/no need to save. Also Gordo would be proved right on no more boom and bust as it would now be no boom and (then) bust.

  • rate this

    Comment number 125.

    113 LL please dont come out with that old chestnut ......

    I was responsible and in government and made the biggest financial policy mistake in a generation but it wasnt my fault becuase this other group of clowns that I spent my whole time in power castigating would have done the same thing.


  • rate this

    Comment number 124.

    Having read the 89 recommendations...(v sad!)

    It would still appear to be too much public-sector looking out through committees, bodies and task-forces looking OUT, not enough, private-sector inputting IN with suggestions, ideas and recommendations for growth.

    In fact only one section is dedicated to the private-sector at all and that has been hijacked by the antiquated Chamber(s) of Commerce !

  • rate this

    Comment number 123.


    You are factually inaccurate.

    I have not predicted the collapse of the conspiracy, and do not do so now.

    The failed conspiracy government may not be in the best interests of the rest of us, but it is certainly serves the interests of those clinging to power due to it.

    Only possible situation I can see is if LibDems ditch to avoid electoral collapse, but leadership change would be needed.

  • rate this

    Comment number 122.

    Labour had no growth - real terms per capita GDP
    Labour had no growth
    Labour had no growth
    Labour had no growth
    Labour had no growth


  • Comment number 121.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 120.

    re#116 Jon
    I have seen you do it at regular intervals over the two+ years since the last Election.

    Is your memory starting to go ..... ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 119.

    “I believe if he had been Chancellor there would have been even less regulation”

    “I believe”
    Yes, ‘you believe’, you can say that, but what you can’t say is “I know”
    What happened was a specific set of events which led to an asset price bubble which Brown was warned about but chose to ignore. This ‘Tories would have done it’ defence is irrelevant supposition

  • rate this

    Comment number 118.

    UK has no real growth as all of nation's spare cash (3Tn) will be tied up for 15 years building seven new cities size of Birmingham city (council) area & rising public spending & paying off Labour's debts & deficits. Real GDP growth per capita will be beyond UK as fierce inflation sets in with any economic upturn - best UK can do overall
    (outside London) is tighten your belts as UK stagnates

  • rate this

    Comment number 117.

    Many agree Britain & most of its political parties are too London centric & in a tide of London induced adverse UK globalisation - the dogmatic centre-ground view of the market providing fairness, equality, efficiency, max product is recognised as broken - but no politician has the answer - Heseltine is leading here - but even now - no growth Labour mess is not understood & is very damaging

  • rate this

    Comment number 116.


    When have I predicted the coalition falling apart?

    They are mutually dependent in a grubby conspiracy to hang on to power.

    I do remember predicting the tory cuts would put us back into recession. That prediction was back on day one. While you tory chearleaders were predicting massive export lead growth. LOL.

  • Comment number 115.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 114.


    You're going off at a tangent because you've lost the argument.
    Higher pop. through immigration means more people need housing - is called 'demand'
    5m + immigrants & natural inc. in population have increased demand & FI's cautious with mortgages - result is inflation of all & sundry inc. housing rents. House prices rose in 00's due to demand & easy credit

  • rate this

    Comment number 113.

    109. AndyC555
    The point is, both the Tories, NuLabor and the (Orange Book)Lib-Dems all subscribe(d) to the neo-classical economic consensus of laissez-faire government and de-regulation.
    This coalition of the right is full of it's advocates.
    I can't see that if the Tories were in power in the run up to 2007-8, they would have done anything different to prevent the credit crunch.

  • rate this

    Comment number 112.

    I don't think Dave has the breadth of understanding or the necessary wit & imagination to really tackle Britain's current underlying fiscal & economic problem. That's why I couldn't vote for him.

    But if he did, is there perhaps an even greater brake on recovery in the Civil Service? Are Treasury & Dept f. Business like the HO and DfT - not fit for purpose?

  • rate this

    Comment number 111.

    Excuse me for saying so, but is it not time for someone in the Conservative party to grow some? Lets get the UK back to the 80's and at least show some leadership - especially in finacial markets. The US regulators were totally asleep as their "banks" caused global mayhem with their toxic CDO's and CDS's and now those same guys are going after UK's HSBC, Standard, Barcalys for a few millions??

  • rate this

    Comment number 110.

    Just trying to help combat the militant tendency. The combination of loony right/UKIP/BNP/EDF and the misled who seem to increasingly infest many media blog sites. All belligerant attitude but light on argument or evidence. The move to twitteresque soundbites hasn't helped much. A pity if BBC blogs went the same way as the Torygraph. Ok, ok I'll take my anti-paranoia tablet now. ;o)

  • rate this

    Comment number 109.

    108- yawn.

    Labour did it.

    Try defending them instead of saying someone else WOULD have done it if they'd had the chance. It's like you defending eating all the pies by saying someone else would have if you hadn't got there first.

    Grow a back-bone and defend your party to a neutral observer


Page 1 of 7



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.