Repairing Parliament: MPs' three options (including a move)


The Palace of Westminster is falling apart. The 150-year-old building is creaking at the seams. It is stuffed full of asbestos. Much of the electrics are pre-war.

It is so fire unsafe officials fear it would never pass any health and safety test. So the authorities are finally deciding what to do about it.

For some months the body that runs the building - the House of Commons Commission - has been considering a radical plan to close the Palace for a number of years while a complete refurbishment is carried out. In the meantime Parliament would sit elsewhere.

I am told that on Monday night the MPs and officials on the Commission met and decided to postpone any temporary evacuation of the Palace while further work was done to examine the options.

But, crucially, the idea of leaving the Palace was very much not abandoned.

One very senior figure on the Commission argued hard, my sources say, for the idea to be scrapped entirely. He said there was a real reputational risk for him and for Parliament if they were seen to be spending upwards of £2bn on the building in a time of austerity.

But the majority on the committee took the view that the money would not be spent for seven or eight years; it would be spread over quite a long time; and they had a real duty to protect the Palace and make it safe for current and future generations.

So on Wednesday the Commission will publish a report it commissioned from officials into the various options. These include:

* a long term refurbishment carried out piecemeal every summer holiday when MPs are away.

* a partial decamp during which MPs would sit in the House of Lords while the House of Commons was repaired and vice versa

* a total evacuation to a temporary location for both houses.

One option that has been firmly ruled out has been the idea of abandoning the Palace of Westminster entirely for a new-build parliament elsewhere.

What the Commission has asked for is a more detailed and robust business plan for each of these options, plans that set out the detailed costs involved and are independently audited.

"We cannot hide from this," one source said.

"There is a serious health and safety issue. The House is not fire compliant, it could burn down tomorrow. So we are going to get some serious work done to see how we can fix the problem with the best value for money. Our broad attitude is let's stay in if we can, but also let's go where the figures take us. We are damned if we do and damned if we don't."

The new estimates are expected to take at least a year to draw up so MPs do not expect any decision to be taken until 2014 with the work not likely to begin until 2018 at the earliest.

James Landale Article written by James Landale James Landale Deputy political editor

Autumn Statement: Osborne's political balancing act

George Osborne's challenge is simple to explain but hard to achieve. He will want to use the poor borrowing figures to try to convince voters that the recovery is still too fragile to risk any change of government. But he will want to avoid voters concluding that his failure to fix the deficit at the pace he intended means that it might be time to give Labour a go.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from James


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 39.

    Why not a parliamentary body based outside of London? There's no longer a reason why it has to be exclusively there. Historically parliament was held wherever the monarch in the country. Keep certain admin and back office in one location and have MPs move between the Kingdoms for periods of time. It'd remove the Westminster Bubble factor and force MPs to connect with citizens.

  • rate this

    Comment number 38.

    they should relocate to Europe Strasburg or Brussels , they seem to have delegated the work of OUR parliament other there to unelected bods but no travel expenses or any other expenses they get paid enough . in fact quite a good time to how is it ? oh downsize bring back a slimmer leaner commons ! thats if the EU will let them back .

  • rate this

    Comment number 37.

    2 billion quid eh? Worth every penny IMO

    We must maintain these monuments to remind future generations of the corruption sleaze collusion and anti-democratic patrician oligarchies which representative democracy produces

    A huge monument to failure, so future generations can never ever let it happen again

  • rate this

    Comment number 36.

    So which of their rich friends is gonna rent them a meeting place at a super inflated rate at the tax payers expense?

  • rate this

    Comment number 35.

    I believe that Somalia is looking for a new government
    They can have ours, and we'll throw in every civil servant in Whitehall for free as well

    Yours to keep forever, gratis
    Every one of these people is a genius and a credit to the advancement of human society

    No no don't thank us, it was our pleasure

    All we ask in return is that you never ever allow any of them EVER to return to Britain

  • rate this

    Comment number 34.

    Seriously you have got to be kidding me!

    £2Billion to fix up that den if thieves when they are expecting everyone to tighten their belts?

    Yes it's a historical monument which will cost less to repair if the place is turned into a museum and not back into a working place of debortory.

  • rate this

    Comment number 33.

    When they move out we can demolish the place and forget to rebuild it
    We'll save BILLIONS

    ...and that's just on fiddled expenses

    Or move to Edinburgh for 5 years
    ...then Belfast for 5 years
    ...then Cardiff for 5 years

    then back to London for 5 years

    Like they would do in an equal partnership United Kingdom

  • rate this

    Comment number 32.

    Are they moving back their own planet?

  • rate this

    Comment number 31.

    There's a big house at the other end of the Mall that isn't getting used much!
    That said if i had my way my first choice would be the Titanic!

  • rate this

    Comment number 30.


  • rate this

    Comment number 29.

    Move it to Edinburgh for a couple of hundred years. Should kill off Scottish independence and make the English and Londoners particularly realise what it's like being run from another country !!

  • rate this

    Comment number 28.

    I'm sure a friend of a friend, for a hefty bung, can let them rent luxury offices at some cental London location for extortionate prices for the next few decades.

    Meanwhile some other friend of a friend, for a hefty bung, can arrange the gutting, refurbishment, and stringing it along for maximum payout of Parliament.

  • rate this

    Comment number 27.

    Sounds like a good excuse for them to claim for a third house!

  • rate this

    Comment number 26.

    Buy a block of flats in the outskirts of Manchester or Birmingham; have one floor as a debating chamber, use the flats to house MP’s.

    No expenses or second mortgages to pay, easy to protect, save a fortune.

    Then relocate Downing Street to the block next door and create a theme park for overseas tourists in the vacant space in London

    Its called free enterprise,

  • rate this

    Comment number 25.

    The chamber is too small to get them all in anyway!

  • rate this

    Comment number 24.

    Bradford the most culturally diverse? There are other cultures outside of south asian and white northern english!

  • rate this

    Comment number 23.


  • rate this

    Comment number 22.

    Maxwells Demon

    The parliament can move to Bradford, its the "least visited" city in the UK by tourists & is the most culturely divers

    What harm has Bradford done you. This would merely up the criminal population with MPs and Lords moving there.

    Mind you, there is lot of hot air in the "House". Think how much worse it would be with all these fabulous curry restaurants.

  • rate this

    Comment number 21.

    Get a modern building with an electronic voting system, so that the MP,s do not have to file out ad put a cross on a piece of paper.. Or is it too complicated for MP,s to be part of then21st century and embrace technology.

  • rate this

    Comment number 20.

    Surely there must be an under used building on the Olympic Park that could be utilised in the interim. This would allow a closeness to current government departments in central London and as we have spent billions upgrading the transport links to the site we might as well get a bit more use out of it.


Page 1 of 2



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.