Universal Credit: Disabled people 'to lose out'


Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson: "We want to bring to people's attention how their benefits might change"

Related Stories

Up to half a million disabled people and their families stand to lose out under the government's proposed Universal Credit, a report says.

The Children's Society, Citizens Advice and Disability Rights UK say 100,000 households with children could have incomes reduced by up to £28 a week.

They are urging a rethink, particularly on help for future claimants.

But David Cameron said greater support was being targeted at the most disabled and overall funding was going up.

The Universal Credit will replace Jobseeker's allowance, tax credits, income support, employment and support allowance - formerly known as incapacity benefit - and housing benefits with a single payment.

The system will be "piloted" in parts of north-east England next April and will come into force across Britain for new claimants from October 2013.

Existing claimants will be transferred to the new system in stages until 2017, while Universal Credit will be capped at £26,000 per household.


Start Quote

Increasing the overall amount of money, focusing on the most disabled - that I think shows the right values and the right approach”

End Quote David Cameron

The report argues that the changes will mean 230,000 severely disabled people who do not have another adult to assist them will receive between £28 and £58 less in benefits every week.

It also states that around 116,000 disabled people who work will be at risk of losing around £40 per week.

The report says the impact of the cuts in support for disabled children could be "extremely severe" for families currently receiving the mid-rate "care component" of the Disability Living Allowance, a payment made where a child can be severely disabled but does not need care overnight.

Of those families affected, one in 10 expressed fears that they could no longer afford their own home, while two thirds said they would have to cut back on food, and more than a half said it would lead them into debt.

Some families said the changes to support for disabled children could result in their children having to be placed in full-time residential care.

Biggest losers, according to the report

  • 100,000 disabled children who might lose £28 a week.
  • 230,000 severely disabled people without an adult to assist them, could be out of pocket by £28 - £58 a week.
  • 116,000 disabled people in work who are at risk of losing £40 a week.
  • However, the government says no current claimants will be out of pocket when the Universal Credit is introduced.
  • Anyone facing a reduced benefit payment will receive a cash top-up to match their current payment.
  • This payment, called "transitional protection", will be frozen at the time of the switchover and not index linked. Thus, over time it will be devalued by inflation.

The report says 83% of those eligible for the severe disability premium, which will be abolished under the changes, reported that a reduction in benefit levels would mean they would have to cut back on food and 80% said they would have to cut the amount they spent on heating.

The changes start to come into force from October next year and current benefit claimants who move on to Universal Credit will not see an immediate reduction in their payments.

'Clear message'

But they will have their level of benefit frozen, with no increases to take into account rising prices, campaigners say, and they may see their support cut immediately if their household circumstances change.

Independent peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, who shares the title of Great Britain's most successful female Paralympian with cyclist Sarah Storey, said the findings of the report did not make "easy reading".

She told the BBC: "Under the new system it is going to be difficult for a number of disabled people. The government say people are protected but it's only for current benefit claimants.

PMQs: David Cameron on disability benefit and universal credit

"What we want to do is ask the government to think again. We are in a situation where the regulations of the Welfare Reform Bill are coming to us quite soon and we can make changes. I think we can improve the system to help disabled people lead better lives."

But, asked about the issue at prime minister's questions, Mr Cameron defended changes to disability benefits, saying overall funding would increase from £1.35bn in 2011 to £1.45bn in 2015.

"Under the plans, no recipients will lose out unless their circumstances change and all current recipients are fully cash-protected by a transitional scheme," he told MPs.

"What we are doing, and this is a decision and a choice we have made, is for future recipients we are going to increase the amount we give to the most severely disabled children and there will be a new lower amount for less disabled people.

"That is a choice we are making. Increasing the overall amount of money, focusing on the most disabled - that I think shows the right values and the right approach."

The report summarises the findings from three research reports based on evidence from surveys of almost 3,500 disabled people and their families, as well as a parliamentary evidence session.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 919.

    I have had benefits in a different country of late. I was paid my full wage for the 1st year and then 66% of that for the 2nd. I am now back in employment, but am grateful that the funding was in place to ensure that I was given time to get well again. Then again, I pay a proper amount of income tax. When one becomes ill, it is worth every penny. None has once referred to me as a scrounger . . .

  • rate this

    Comment number 880.

    We need welfare reform, but not at the expense of the genuinely needy. Make the savings by cutting benefit to those that have never even attempted to put money in the pot; the work-shy layabouts that I see in the post office, queuing up to collect their handout before spending it on fags andcider at the off-license next door. That's who Cameron should be tackling, not taking mobility allowance.,

  • rate this

    Comment number 595.

    The whole concept of benefits is wrong, rather than paying people to do nothing, a system which is easy and attractive to abuse, the money should be spent getting people back in to work, creating paid jobs for the able bodied and using projects like Remploy (which is sadly being scaled down) for those who aren't. Finally, those who are incapable of physical or mental work should be supported as is

  • rate this

    Comment number 586.

    The benefit system definitely needs review and simplification.

    The huge difficulty is that any changes will create winners and losers, and the losers are always going to feel hard done by.

    The only people who should lose out are those in receipt of help they don't need.

    It doesn't matter what your political views are - nobody can come up with a solution that will please everybody!

  • rate this

    Comment number 572.

    The state must help people who are genuinely disabled.I don't think anyone can argue with that. But the keyword is 'genuinely.' And is it unreasonable,for example to suggest that if someone is able sit at home all day on a computer,(like this site) ,then they could do a desk job ie call centre etc? I stuck at a job I hated for 31 years,by the way,so no sympathy for the workshy from me.


Comments 5 of 10


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.