Freedom of Information to include ministers' private texts
The guidance change stems from a dispute over an email from a private account sent by Michael Gove
Emails from private accounts and texts sent by the prime minister and cabinet members could be accessible under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI).
New government guidance will say the act relates to "the nature of the information and not the format".
The shift is revealed in a Department for Education letter, abandoning a two-year dispute with the Information Commissioner related to private emails.
The 2000 act aimed to make government more open and accessible.
For almost the last two years, Education Secretary Michael Gove has been in dispute with Information Commissioner Christopher Graham, over whether Mr Gove's private emails were accessible under the Freedom of Information Act.
A message sent from a private account by Mr Gove in December 2010 had been obtained and published by the Financial Times.
'Nearing publication'The BBC has seen a letter to the commissioner from the director of law and information rights at the Department for Education, Claire Johnston, outlining that the department will give up its dispute over releasing details of emails sent from Mr Gove's private account.
It also reveals that new guidance on the scope of the Freedom of Information Act will be published by the Cabinet Office "shortly".
The initial row centred on whether it was legitimate for communication via private email accounts to be accessed by journalists and others if they made a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
Mr Gove and his advisers insisted they were acting in good faith and - in line with the codes for ministers and special advisers - they did not wish to conduct political, as opposed to departmental, conversations on government computers.
The letter discloses that the new guidance from the Cabinet Office is at "an advanced state and nearing publication".
A spokeswoman for the Cabinet Office told me: "The guidance will make clear that whether or not information is subject to the Freedom of Information Act depends on the nature of the information and not the format in which it is held.
"Government information held on private email accounts is within scope of the Freedom of Information Act."
Government businessThis, potentially, raises the prospect of communication via text between, say, the prime minister and the deputy prime minister, being requested under the act if it related to government business.
"The question of how the Freedom of Information Act applies to information held on private email accounts is a complex area of the law, on which the Information Commissioner's Office has issued guidance.
"The Cabinet Office is preparing guidance on how this applies to Central Government Departments, and this will be published shortly," the statement adds.
There will be those who question whether the potential for much greater disclosure will be in the interests of well-functioning government.
In his memoirs, former Prime Minister Tony Blair was particularly outspoken about the Freedom of Information Act, a law introduced when he was in Downing Street.
"You idiot. You naive, foolish, irresponsible nincompoop. There is really no description of stupidity, no matter how vivid, that is adequate. I quake at the imbecility of it," he wrote.
"For political leaders, it's like saying to someone who is hitting you over the head with a stick, 'Hey, try this instead,' and handing them a mallet."
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~56~RS~)


Government leads new GM crops push
Sopranos actor James Gandolfini dies
Disaster on ice
Renegade reporter
Bad tip?
Ye gods
On the move in Mumbai
Comment number 102.
angry_of_garston30th September 2012 - 15:52
There will never be transparancy if Ministers are allowed a communication method that escapes scrutiny. It is only right that private texts and emails should be available for scrutiny if the content concerns public issues.
A dirty deal is a dirty deal no matter how it is arranged.
Link to this (Comment number 102)
Comment number 100.
presario30th September 2012 - 15:16
Private Emails should remain private, otherwise private communication will take place over the phone. MPs and civil servants must have the facility to discuss off the record.
Link to this (Comment number 100)
Comment number 83.
quantumcheese30th September 2012 - 13:28
Now hang on. Private texts between consenting adults?
This is just a way of digging up more & more irrelevant and ridiculous stories for the gutter press
How long before Minister X gets had up for sending an inappropriate wink to a Minister Y and we find ourselves staring at SMSgate headlines.
Link to this (Comment number 83)
Comment number 82.
Touchstone30th September 2012 - 13:28
Fantastic. This should make it easier to hold them to account; besides, you have to ask yourself, what are THEY trying to hide...
I don't want my politicians making shady secret deals or using private email addresses to attempt to avoid freedom of information requests.
They are voted in by us, work for us and are accountable to us; isn't it time we really knew what they where up to?
Link to this (Comment number 82)
Comment number 61.
Piestall_Fred30th September 2012 - 12:17
This seems ridiculous to me. It is quite obvious that government ministers need to be able to maintain confidentiality on some issues. How many of the commentators pontificating here would be happy to have all their private correspondence available to the public?
Link to this (Comment number 61)
Comments 5 of 7