MPs warn census axing could harm social science

 
census form The committee said the census was incredibly valuable to social researchers

Related Stories

Scrapping the 10-yearly national census could harm social science in the UK, a group of MPs has warned.

The government is looking into whether there are less costly alternatives, with a view to scrapping the next census in 2021.

But the MPs said other methods of data collection may not be adequate and might not be any cheaper.

The government said the census was outdated and a "more effective, less bureaucratic" survey was needed.

The last census, which took place in 2011, cost an estimated £480m.

In 2010 Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude said: "There are, I believe, ways of doing this which will provide better, quicker information, more frequently and cheaper."

'Costly mistake'

But the Science and Technology Committee said they were not convinced that alternative ways of collecting the data would be a cheaper option.

The MPs also raised concerns that social science in the UK would suffer if serious consideration was not given to how the data would be replaced and that any alternative may not be able to provide nationwide coverage like the census.

However, the MPs acknowledged there were a range of problems with the census in its current form, which is always at least two years out of date by the time the data is published.

Chair of the cross-party committee Andrew Miller said: "Ministers must think hard before they take the decision to scrap the census."

"The census has provided the UK with one of the richest collections of population data in the world.

"It is incredibly valuable to social researchers, charities and the public sector and a move to cancel the census on financial grounds may prove to be a costly mistake."

The Office for National Statistics is currently consulting on alternatives to the 2021 census and is expected to report its findings in 2014.

A Cabinet Office spokeswoman said: "The government believes that the census, in its current form, is outdated.

"We are supporting ONS' work to design a replacement which will allow for more effective, less bureaucratic collection of the information necessary for the operation of public services. We will keep Parliament informed about the progress of this work."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 18.

    Dont know about the census, I would just be happy if our MPs got some common sensus

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 17.

    @14

    It's not Lizard men and David Icke isn't quite right in the head, but there are so many forms wanting to know every private aspect of your life. Why? The gvt know where I work, because I pay tax, they know where I live because I pay council tax, they know how many kids I have because I have recieved child benefit. . . . .It goes on and on. It's a waste of money

  • Comment number 16.

    All this user's posts have been removed.Why?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 15.

    I can see where some of the questions in the census need to be revised or removed. As the state has no role in the provision of religious services, it is none of their business which deity, if any, I worship. As we are supposed to 'celebrate dirversity' I refuse to classify myself by the colour of my hide (and there wasn't an accurate descriptor available anyway: it's a sort of pinkish-beige...).

  • Comment number 14.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 13.

    I believe the country could be run much more cheaply and less bureaucratically, and that our present system of government is outdated and inefficient.

    Can we please do away with it as well?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 12.

    How many illegal immigrants fill in & return a census form?
    Can any idiot MP or bureaucrat answer that question?

    BTW, I still get rubbish mail from catalogue companies that I used 25 years ago - if they can find me 20 years later after numerous address changes - why do we need a census when most if not all plus a load more, of the information needed, is out there on public & private databases?

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 11.

    I'm confused about why this is an issue. All that's being said is that the current method of taking the census is outdated. Which is hard to deny.

    There's no indication that the entire process will be done away with, quite the opposite. The propsal I see here is for the census to be rethought as a process and a better solution developed.

    Where's the sky falling in here?

  • Comment number 10.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 9.

    We need the national census every ten years but I am not convinced that we need the whole range of questions that get asked. Maybe that is one way to simplify things - rely on sample surveys for the detail and censuses for the numbers.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 8.

    Censuses are not only valuable tools for the social scientists living in their ivory towers but they are also invaluable for the planning of services in local authorities. Combined with effective population forecasting, they are the tools that tell how many school places we need, how many hospital beds, how many care home places. Without accurate checks population estimates are liable to drift.

  • rate this
    +11

    Comment number 7.

    A national census is something that should remain.

    It is of huge benefit to historians when examining social change. It is of huge benefit when we need to know demographic trends.


    Why should anyone object to taking part? Government should leave it as it is, we are very lucky to have such a resource.

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 6.

    The census is a valuable historical research tool, one of its strengths being the consistency of data collection - once every 10 years, based on where people live, showing family/household groups and occupations. For this reason alone it ought to be retained, never mind contemporary demographic uses for which such a dataset is ideal.

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 5.

    392,000 Jedis say keep the census

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 4.

    If the current administration can come up with an alternative that is more effective (and cheaper) than the current census, put it out to comment and let people who have an informed view examine the proposals and provide their views. In the meantime we should proceed with the current approach. The data the census provides is crucial not least of all for study and analysis by future generations

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 3.

    I always think that electoral registers and census forms are a way for the government to make sure they have correct numbers for the amount of people with a taxable income so they can make sure all of your revenue is accounted for and they can get as much as they can from you.
    It has nothing to do with your right to vote etc

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 2.

    Given the way census forms over the years have been abused to meet the ends of the respective governments of the day (see: Japanese-Americans imprisoned, social engineering madness based on ethnic make-up etc.), scrapping this thing will potentially benefit social science no end.

  • Comment number 1.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

 

Page 5 of 5

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Politics Live

  1.  
    07:34: 'More flexibility' BBC Radio 4 Today

    "I'm not putting caps or targets," Mr Farage continues. "You need to have more flexibility than that." "What I want to talk about is how we'd be better off with an Australian-style points system."

     
  2.  
    @Peston Robert Peston BBC economics editor

    tweets: Living standards back to where they were in 2007-8, but mainly for those over 60. & are rising strongly now, says IFS

     
  3.  
    07:28: Eurostar sale
    Eurostar train

    In case you're wondering what Barry Sheerman was tweeting about, the government announced overnight it had sold its stake in Eurostar. The stake is being bought by a Canadian pension fund and a UK asset manager, who will buy shares for £585m. Eurostar will also hand over £170m to redeem shares which guarantee a dividend. The government's stake was officially valued last year at £325m.

     
  4.  
    'Who benefits?' BBC Radio 4 Today

    Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Chris Leslie is sure that people aren't feeling richer. "I don't think we can dispute there is a recovery, but the question is who benefits from that recovery," he tells Today. He certainly doesn't accept that the IFS report blows any holes in Labour's arguments about a cost of living crisis.

     
  5.  
    07:24: Household incomes

    Big discussion about the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) report on household incomes. Whether the average household income is back to levels they were at before the financial downturn struck. One one measure, for the over 60s, it is. But for most of the rest of us, it hasn't got there yet. Our story here.

     
  6.  
    @PickardJE Jim Pickard, chief political correspondent for the Financial Times

    tweets: Household incomes returning to pre-crisis levels, more or less. Labour's campaign theme for March? Cost of living crisis.

     
  7.  
    07:15: 'Sounds a lot' BBC Breakfast

    Mr Farage says his new immigration system would cost "a few hundred million pounds" which "sounds a lot" but would bring huge savings in the long run.

     
  8.  
    07:14: 'Some exceptions' BBC Breakfast

    UKIP suggests someone coming in to Britain should earn £27,000 or more. But when it's put to Mr Farage that a nurse's starting salary is much less than that, he admits: "I do accept that with the health service there will be some exceptions."

     
  9.  
    07:12: Skilled workers BBC Breakfast

    Nigel Farage has moved on to BBC Breakfast. He says last year 27,000 people came into the UK who would have passed UKIP's points system. He seems happy with that as long as all of that number don't claim benefits for five years and have health insurance.

     
  10.  
    07:06: 'Wages have struggled' BBC Radio 4

    Over on Today - which you can listen to via the live tab above - Paul Johnson, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, says incomes have "taken an awfully long time to recover", but the government has made a "reasonably significant effort at reducing the deficit". More on the IFS's view of wages in our story here.

     
  11.  
    07:01: 'Back to normality'

    Nigel Farage has done his first interview of the day on Good Morning Britain. He was pressed about his immigration policy. He said the 50,000 mentioned by Steven Wolfe wasn't about net migration it was "about the number of foreign workers" arriving in Britain. He says the British public are "bored of targets", and he wants to get immigration "back to normality", which traditionally "varied between about 20 and 50,000 a year". He sounds slightly exasperated when it's put to him that, actually, that still sounds like a target.

     
  12.  
    @BarrySheerman Barry Sheerman, Labour MP for Huddersfield

    tweets: Selling off the family silver in a panic as Election approaches Royal Mail East Coast & now Eurostar! What a Govt!

     
  13.  
    Gawain Towler, UKIP communications officer

    tweets: @Nigel_Farage waiting to go on Good Morning Britain @ukip

    Nigel Farage

     
  14.  
    @WalesPolitics BBC Wales Politics

    tweets: More Welsh voters think David Cameron (34%) would make a better PM than Ed Miliband (23%), according to a BBC Wales/ICM poll published today

     
  15.  
    06:48: Policy muddle? Norman Smith BBC Assistant Political Editor

    You might say this is just policy nerds at Westminster trawling over the details of UKIP policy, but the danger, I think, for them is that this moves from a policy muddle story to a policy shambles story. It could become an issue about UKIP's credibility and how serious a party they are, and that does have the potential to damage them. It also follows a bit of a tangle they got into over the NHS a short time ago about whether they favour a private insurance model or not.

    I wonder - and we saw it to some extent with the Greens last week - if the smaller parties are beginning to sweat a bit now the focus is really on them. They are beginning to find it a bit tougher.

    Despite all the talk of this election being different from any before, I wonder whether actually this might really end up being the usual big clash between the two big parties on the two big issues, the economy and the NHS.

     
  16.  
    06:41: Party politics
    David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Theresa May

    We stand corrected. Having said Theresa May seemed unmoved by whatever joke David Cameron and Nick Clegg were enjoying yesterday before the Mexican president's visit, we've found evidence to the contrary. Here she is having a ball with the deputy PM.

     
  17.  
    06:38: Lib Dem drug policy
    Nick Clegg

    Nick Clegg is due to give a speech today on drugs. He'll say a future Lib Dem government would take control of drugs policy out of the hands of the Home Office and give it to the Department of Health. He will also pledge to end the "nonsense" of jailing people for possessing small amount of drugs for their personal use, and say young people should not be penalised in later life because of a criminal record.

     
  18.  
    @YouGov YouGov, polling firm

    tweets: Update: Cons lead at 2 - Latest YouGov / Sun results 3rd Mar - Con 36%, Lab 34%, LD 5%, UKIP 14%, GRN 6%; APP -19

     
  19.  
    06:32: Target ditched? Robin Brant Political Correspondent, BBC News

    Nigel Farage is expected to say his party wants a new migration control commission to get net migration down. We already know it also wants to give commonwealth citizens the same rights to come here as EU workers. And if it was in government, UKIP would have a points-based system, like in Australia, to only allow in highly skilled workers that the economy needs.

    But the idea of a cap - or target - on how many can come appears to have been ditched. Having seen the Conservatives get into trouble after they spectacularly failed to deliver on a firm pledge to get net migration down to the tens of thousands, the UKIP leader says he does not want any 'arbitrary targets'. But just last week the party's spokesman on the issue, Steven Woolfe talked about an annual gross target of 50 thousand workers. It's something the party has touted as policy for months.

     
  20.  
    06:27: UKIP immigration speech

    On to today's news. Campaign-wise, UKIP are currently top of the shop with a big speech coming up later on one of the subjects they're most associated with - immigration. Leader Nigel Farage will promise not to set "arbitrary" immigration targets and instead focus on controlling our borders with an Australian-style points-based visa system. The use of the word "arbitrary" is no doubt a dig at David Cameron who, of course, vowed to get immigration down below 100,000 at the last general election, but has been unable to do so.

     
  21.  
    06:22: Front pages

    Here's our digest of today's newspapers. In terms of politics, the Sun claims to have a Budget exclusive, saying George Osborne is planning to cut the price of a pint again. Elsewhere, the Times' front page carries a big picture of David Cameron and Nick Clegg in stitches at an event on Tuesday. Whatever the joke was, Theresa May, pictured behind them stony-faced, doesn't seem to get it.

     
  22.  
    06:18: Labour demands more on abuse

    Labour want to go further and make it mandatory for any allegation of abuse to be reported. They accused the government of "a missed opportunity", but others, including, former Conservative children's minister Tim Loughton, warned against Labour's idea, saying it could put victims off telling anyone about their suffering.

     
  23.  
    06:16: Child sexual abuse

    Tuesday was dominated by the issue of child sexual abuse as a damning report into the treatment of girls in Oxfordshire was published. David Cameron held a meeting at No 10 and announced that in future, teachers, councillors and social workers in England and Wales who fail to protect children could face up to five years in jail.

     
  24.  
    06:11: Good morning

    Hello and welcome to a fresh Wednesday's political coverage. Victoria King and Matthew West will bring you all the action, reaction and analysis in text and you'll be able to watch and listen to all the main BBC political programmes, from Today and Breakfast through to Newsnight and Today in Parliament. Don't forget you can get in touch by emailing politics@bbc.co.uk or via social media @bbcpolitics. Here's how Tuesday unfolded.

     

Features

  • Elderly manSuicide decline

    Why are fewer elderly people killing themselves in the UK?


  • Petrol pumpPumping up

    Why are petrol prices rising again?


  • Image of George from Tube CrushTube crush

    How London's male commuters set Chinese hearts racing


  • TricycleTreasure trove

    The lost property shop stuffed with diamonds, bikes... and a leg


Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.