The truth behind UK migration figures

 
Heathrow border control

Related Stories

Ever wondered how many people are moving to, and leaving, the UK? If so, you're not the only one - the official figures are said by some experts to be based on not much more than guesswork.

Yes, despite few issues mattering more to politicians and the public than migration, the UK still does not have an accurate system for counting people in and out.

The e-borders scheme - which was meant to do this job - is still a work in progress, and despite government assurances to the contrary, there are some who fear it might stay that way.

Instead the government relies on the answers given by a sample of travellers who agree to be stopped and questioned by a team of social survey interviewers at Heathrow and other main air, sea and rail points of entry to the UK.

And despite the increasingly high hurdles to jump through to get a visa to come to the UK, it seems there is no way of knowing if someone is still in the country when it expires.

UK population

Crowd of shoppers
  • According to the 2011 census there are 53 million people in England; 3.1 million in Wales; and 1.8 million in Northern Ireland
  • The figure for Scotland - and the whole of the UK - will be announced in December
  • The population of England and Wales has risen by 3.7 million in a decade - the largest increase since records began
  • The growth was fuelled by increased life expectancy, a rise in fertility rates and immigration
  • The 2011 census could be the last - the government is looking into cheaper and more responsive alternatives

Keith Vaz, chairman of the influential home affairs committee says he finds it incredible that a supermarket loyalty scheme can collect and store details on the shopping habits of millions of people, yet a similar database can not be set up to record arrivals and departures.

Particularly when the coalition government sets such store by reducing "net migration" - the difference between the number of people entering and leaving the country.

So if Britain does not count everybody in as they arrive, and count them out again as they depart, where exactly do the net migration figures announced each quarter by the government come from?

The main source is the International Passenger Survey (IPS), which was designed in the early 1960s to find out how much foreign tourists were spending in the UK - something it is still used for today.

It works something like this: There are about 240 IPS officials stationed at major airports and ports around the country.

They pick out every 10th, 20th or 30th passenger streaming through arrivals or departures, depending on how busy they are that day, and ask if they wouldn't mind taking part in a short survey.

"There may be times when, owing to a particular flood of passengers, you just cannot keep an accurate count. Do not panic if this happens but keep counting as best you can," advises the Office for National Statistics training manual.

'Hopelessly inadequate'

The ONS takes the raw IPS data and adds information about asylum seekers and migration statistics from Northern Ireland, as well as figures for people who have entered the country on short-term visas and decided to ask to extend their stay, before arriving at a final immigration figure.

About 300,000 people are interviewed each year by IPS officials - about 0.2% of the 200 million who enter and leave the UK over the same period.

The IPS has been considerably beefed up in the past three years, after it came in for stinging criticism from senior figures, including Bank of England governor Mervyn King, who branded it "hopelessly inadequate".

The ONS admits the survey is still not perfect but points out that 800,000 people are sampled to find the 300,000 interviewees and it has cast its net wider than Heathrow, where most interviewers were based, to other airports around the country and ferry terminals at Dover and Portsmouth it says 95% of travellers now "have a chance" of being interviewed.

It also has the virtue of being long established and relatively cheap.

But it is entirely voluntary and despite the training manual's advice to interviewers to be cheerful at all times - "no one wants to be interviewed by an unsmiling person with a dreary monotonous voice". Although the response rate is 78%, the ONS says that only 2% of people approached refuse to take part in it.

Passengers travelling at night, when interviews are suspended, or on smaller, low volume routes also slip through the net.

The one thing the IPS has over other sources of data on immigration - such as the number of non-EU passengers passing through border control, new NHS registrations or new National Insurance numbers - is that it records how long migrants say they intend to stay in the country.

Graph How accurate are the official net migration figures?

But its major flaw, according to experts, is when it comes to measuring how many people are leaving the country.

IPS emigration estimates are based on interviews with just 2,000 people (who, the ONS point out, are found from interviews with about 400,000 interviews) - and there is currently no alternative source of data to measure them against.

This matters because the coalition government has promised to reduce net migration - the difference between those entering and leaving the country - to "tens of thousands" by 2015.

'Difficult'

Home Secretary Theresa May hailed "the first significant falls in net migration since the 1990s" in her keynote speech to the Conservative Party conference.

What she failed to mention was that when that "significant fall", from 252,000 to 216,000, was announced, the margin of error was also revealed for the first time.

What happened to e-borders?

Tony Blair
  • Tony Blair launched the £1.2bn e-borders programme in 2003
  • It was meant to collect details from passenger lists of all people entering and leaving the UK so that they can be checked against security watch lists
  • All flights from outside the EU are now part of e-borders
  • Ports and railway stations are due to follow by 2014
  • EU flights are meant to be covered by 2015
  • But that will depend on reaching voluntary agreements with other nations - and solving commercial problems
  • The US firm handed a £750m contract by Labour to deliver e-borders, Raytheon, was fired by the coalition in 2010 for "extremely disappointing" performance
  • The company is seeking £500m in damages from the government
  • The e-borders contract was split in two with IBM and Serco given the job of getting a system in place at nine airports before the Olympics
  • The contract for the post-Olympics element of the programme - the biggest part of it - has yet to be awarded

This showed that the main source of these figures was only accurate to within plus or minus 35,000 people.

In other words, according to the ONS, the fall was not yet statistically significant.

This does not mean, of course, that net migration has not fallen, just that, according to some experts, the government's main method of measuring its progress is little better than a rough guess.

"It is very difficult to assess how well the government is progressing toward its target of reducing net-migration to the 'tens of thousands', or to evaluate the effects of specific policy changes," says Dr Martin Ruhs, Director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford.

"In simple terms the government could miss the 'tens of thousands' target by many tens of thousands and still appear to have hit it - conversely the government could hit, or even exceed its target and still appear to have missed it."

The government denies that the IPS is a faulty instrument for measuring its progress on migration.

In a statement to the BBC, Immigration Minister Mark Harper said: "The International Passenger Survey already provides the ONS with a reliable method of measuring net migration.

"By 2015, we aim to reintroduce exit checks using the e-borders system, which will allow us to build an even more accurate picture of the number of people entering and leaving the country."

A brainchild of the Tony Blair era, when it seemed as if there was no problem that could not be solved by a multi-billion pound IT project, e-borders was meant to replace the old paper-based embarkation system, which was scrapped in the 1990s.

Since then departures from the UK have not been officially recorded.

So it is possible for migrants to enter on short-term visas and - unless they notify the authorities of their intention to stay longer or are really, really unlucky and are picked up in a Border Force raid - stay in the UK or leave the country years later without showing up in the official records.

It was one of the justifications Mr Blair made - and is still making - for the introduction of an identity card system.

E-borders which was primarily meant to improve security, when combined with a biometric identity card scheme, began collecting details of passenger and crews for inbound flights from outside the EU at nine airports in March.

The plan now is to extend it to ports and railway stations by 2014 and to passengers from within the EU by 2015.

But that will depend on persuading all EU countries to share passenger and crew list information - quite a number of them regard this as illegal under European free movement laws.

High hopes

And there are some, such as Keith Vaz and Sir Andrew Green, of think tank Migration Watch, who fear the project, which was meant to be up and running in time for the Olympics, may have stalled altogether.

"The government will rightly be held to account if they fail to achieve a steady and substantial reduction in net migration, whatever the technical details," said Sir Andrew.

"But it is time we were told more about the purpose and progress of the e-borders programme."

The statisticians at the ONS still have high hopes that e-borders will one day be able to provide reliable migration statistics.

But they say it will be 2018 at the earliest before they can even start incorporating data from the programme into their estimates - and there are no plans to replace the IPS as the main source of migration data.

So until the Home Office can be persuaded to come up with a different method - the men and women of the IPS will continue to put on their best smiles and try not to panic as they scan the arrivals halls of Britain's ports and airports.

And net migration statistics should continue to be taken with a major dose of salt.

Graph showing increase in migration
 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 134.

    Why are immigrants who have "lost" their identification still let in. We have owners making sheds/garages into living places. Many work illegally,have rubbish collected but are not sent back nor owners punished. Known for yrs. BBC reported millions£ spent on nhs who should not be treated. If people know they wont be treated/free schooling etc many wouldnt come. They shoud be made to buy privately

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 133.

    The demographics for my town (official) are that we are nearly 87% white British.

    This is absolutely a load of rubbish take a walk into town and see the truth. Also there has been a huge influx of Eastern Europeans. As you can see from the three shops that are specifically catering for them.

    My thought on immigration-enough. We are over capacity.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 132.

    1) If they are relying on a new universal computer system to bring home the goods then forget it!
    2) Several years ago, we tried to get the visa extended for a Hong Kong programmer. The guy was brilliant, however, in the end we gave up and he moved to Canada, Our loss, their gain.
    Make the system easier and people may actually register; and we may be able to retain talent.

  • Comment number 131.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 130.

    98DaisyThing

    If it's any help a lot of the intolerant and xenophobic comments here make me keen to emigrate.
    ====
    You mean you're not willing to tolerate them?

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 129.

    Immigration is a shambles in this country. One of Labour's most sinful legacies is that it opened the floodgates for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, most of whom I'm sure are fine people but many of whom had no right or business being here, then played the racism card when people complained about the inevitable burden on public services. Cynical, cheap attempt at getting more votes.

  • rate this
    +47

    Comment number 128.

    The problem is not with immigration, it is with the soft touch approach by the government agencies involved. Undesirables and illegal immigrants should be removed as soon as they are caught, not allowed to remain free and in the community. Those who come by air should be the responsibility of the airline, and those entering by sea should be returned to their point of embarkation immediately.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 127.

    Make some statistics on how much this costs the UK - that's the only way the government will listen.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 126.

    We are way past the need for any official figures. Just wake up and take a walk through any town or city centre. We all know why people are desperate to come to the UK, but sinking us will not solve the world’s problems. It’s time for a complete moratorium on immigration until we come up with some system of policy that works.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 125.

    81. "Racist , NO its called freedom of speech ."

    I am so sick of people acting like they can't be racist because they're just "doing freedom of speech". It *can* be both, you know?

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 124.

    @98. You might not be able to emigrate. The fact that we have British passports means very little. Countries like Australia and Canada have extremely robust immigration policies and have had for years. Or are they all intolerant racists too?

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 123.

    @97 Ace Face,
    I am a British National and have held a passport,since the 1970's.I have travelled a bit in 30 years,but i have never been fingerprinted,or scanned on my return to the UK,unless i have missed something covert.

    @100 Rufus McDufus,
    They do not honestly know the true figures,but still they deny it,like an Ostrich.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 122.

    47. hairyback
    "Thank god for immigrants!!! they look out for our elderly, major contribution to the NHS." Take up low paid jobs that no one wants.
    TOTALLY WRONG. EITHER PAY FOR LOW PAID JOBS SHOULD BE INCREASED TO ATTRACT BRITISH PEOPLE OR THESE DEMEANING JOBS SHOULD BE DONE BY MACHINES AND NOT PEOPLE.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 121.

    immigrants work for less pay...........that was yesteryear.
    Farmers dont employ british labour because they would lose the £100pw pp rent for the 20-30 immigrants living in caravans and barns.
    Do the maths
    rent money is worth more than the crops bieng picked.
    Farmers and gangmasters are laughing all the way to the bank singing ....what recession .

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 120.

    The problem is britain is full we are the most densely populated country in europe , the infrastructure cannot cope its obvious to anyone that we have more in than out.

  • rate this
    +15

    Comment number 119.

    @98

    Wake up love!


    It's an attitude like yours that does not help the situation in any way! The solution is NOT to run away , but to stand together as a nation to fight for what is right by the people here, and stop any more entering illegally so as to sustain a decent lifestyle for those that belong here legally

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 118.

    88 - you don't have to be a legal resident to buy a house in the UK - you can be a regular visitor whose main home is elsewhere.

    You probably don't like that, but if you were selling your house you'd sell to the highest bidder regardless of citizenship, residence or need.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 117.

    An endless supply of unskilled labour from poor countries is good for employers, bad for the manual workers whose wages are undercut. Middle-class people get cheap household staff. Inner-city areas become ever poorer, with higher crime, loss of community and overstretched infrastructure. But the people who suffer aren't politicians or influential journalists. That's why nothing is done.

  • rate this
    +14

    Comment number 116.

    //Bob
    6 MINUTES AGO
    How many people working on our borders are Brits//

    I've often wondered about that. Airports are staffed largely by non-Brits. Many passport-checkers seem to be foreign or ethnic minority.

    Our local Asian politicians make it clear that they represent 'their' communities, not the general population. Makes you wonder if border staff aren't the same.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 115.

    @93

    Whilst no doubt you reserve your right to go anywhere in the world you wish?

    No need to froth at the mouth over this one, it is possible to sort it out with a little thought and a lot of commitment.

 

Page 24 of 30

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

  • Krak des ChevaliersSitting targets

    How ancient treasures in Syria are being bombed to pieces


  • Mesut Ozil's tattoo reads "Only God can judge me"Ink explained

    Nine World Cup players' tattoos decoded, and one who refuses


  • Putting a coin in supermarket trolleyMinor annoyance

    Why are Morrisons getting rid of coin-locks on trolleys?


  • Sekhemka statueSelling out?

    The councils tempted to cash in on their art collections


  • Google sweetsName game

    Would Google have made it as BackRub?


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.