Making a difference

 

You don't have to be a minister to get things done in Parliament.

Backbench MPs with a few streetsmarts and a lot of persistence can change government policy and even the law, if they know how to use the procedures of the Commons to press their case. There's a good example coming up in the Commons tomorrow….in my round-up of the coming week's parliamentary business, I noted that "the former Conservative minister Sir Paul Beresford continues his long-running campaign to tighten up the law dealing with known paedophiles - his Coroners and Justice (Amendment) Bill would introduce restrictions on their access to written material".

For the last 10 years Sir Paul has been bringing in modest measures to close gaps in the law - the latest deals with possession of prohibited written material about children - and cumulatively, his efforts have made quite a difference. Over the years, through a series of private members bills, ten minute rule bills, and amendments to government bills, he has:

* banned the possession of indecent images of children in the form of cartoons, tracings, pseudo photographs and CGIs

* changed the legal definition of gross indecency with a child so that it applies to under-16s, rather than under-14s

* increased the sentences that can be imposed for possession of indecent images from six months to five years, with 10 years for a repeat offence

* increased the penalty for distribution of indecent images from a maximum of three years to a maximum of 10

* required that judges should have to view the material concerned before passing sentence

* introduced a fast-track search warrant procedure, so that if someone on the sex offenders register refuses police access to search their home, a judge will automatically grant a warrant

* introduced a five-year sentence for people who refuse to provide a decrypting key to allow police to inspect computers suspected of holding child pornography.

Last year, Sir Paul also piloted through a private members' bill intended to protect children and vulnerable adults from domestic violence in cases where two people in a household could have committed the crime, but neither would admit to it, and each blamed the other. It extended the existing crime of causing a death or failing to take reasonable steps to protect a child or vulnerable adult to cover "serious harm".

He was certainly helped by the procession of criminal justice bills in the Labour years, which provided plenty of opportunities to change the law (the smart tactic in the Commons is to put down new clauses at report stage, where the rules require that they are debated first) but it's an example of how a determined MP who knows how to use ten minute rule bills, private members' bills, adjournment debates and the whole spectrum of Commons procedure can fight a cause over 10 years, and have a significant impact.

Those MPs contemplating a career on the backbenches, or newly returned to them, should take note.

 
Mark D'Arcy, Parliamentary correspondent Article written by Mark D'Arcy Mark D'Arcy Parliamentary correspondent

Week ahead at Westminster

There's still time for a soupcon of high-powered politics as MPs and peers prepare to decamp for their Easter break.

Read full article

More on This Story

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    >For some, the written word is more powerful than the pictures. For some, the written word promotes a graphic image in their mind.

    Does this mean we can see murder mystery novels being banned now? Heck, why not just ban thoughts completely?

    This country tries to classify itself as "free." That hasn't been the case for years now. It's like living in North Korea.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 5.

    Where an MP has the detailed understanding this is certainly the case.

    However whilst we can find merit in these changes. TOO many by far are not in the "Public's Greater Good"

    This is no way to run an open and democratic parliament.

    no amount of amending can turn poor law into good law; get on with the day job please.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 4.

    Whilst some persistent Ministers do help to make changes - these are usually on the areas of where they have relevance or quite often stand to gain economically. If they are so committed to democratic transparency why don't they make mis-representations of their Election manifestos a chargeable offence so that we can sue the Tories and the Liberals of duping us in the last farcical Election?

  • Comment number 3.

    This comment has been referred for further consideration. Explain.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 2.

    Mark, if you think that the common people can apply this to banking fraud or to parliament members fiddling or even economic policy.

    YOU'RE DREAMING!

 

Comments 5 of 6

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.