Nick Clegg confirms Lords reforms have been officially withdrawn


Mr Clegg said campaigners had "inched forward" in their battle for an elected House of Lords

Related Stories

The government has officially withdrawn proposed legislation for elections to the House of Lords after admitting defeat over the plans last month.

In a statement to the Commons, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said ministers had sought but failed to build a consensus on the changes.

Tory MPs who opposed the plans cheered Mr Clegg as he confirmed the U-turn on the first day after the recess.

Labour said it "shared the coalition's disappointment" about lack of progress.

The government was forced to abandon moves towards a largely elected Lords, championed by the Lib Dems, after nearly 100 Conservative MPs refused to support the plans.

This led to a row between the Conservatives and the Lib Dems, with Mr Clegg accusing Prime Minister David Cameron of refusing to deliver on a key part of the parties' coalition agreement.

'Pick and mix'

Mr Clegg told MPs he "regretted" the failure to reach agreement but the case for a democratic Lords was still overwhelming and he "hoped to return" to the issue after the next election, scheduled for 2015.

Start Quote

The boundary changes will not go through before 2015”

End Quote Nick Clegg

He repeated his intention to vote against the implementation of changes to MPs' constituency boundaries, saying reform to the Lords and the Commons were part of the same "constitutional package".

The proposals - strongly backed by the Conservatives - have already been approved in principle by Parliament but Mr Clegg said the coalition partners could not take a "pick and mix approach" to political reforms.

There was no commitment to introduce the boundary changes in time for the 2015 election, Mr Clegg argued, and the Lib Dems as a whole would not support their introduction before then in any future vote.

Without Lib Dem support - and with Labour also opposed - the government would lose any vote, he said.

"The end result is now a foregone conclusion," he told MPs. "The boundary changes will not go through before 2015."


Tory MP Bernard Jenkin said this was "disgraceful", as the redrawing of constituency boundaries - which would reduce the number of MPs by 50 and equalize constituency sizes - was not linked at all to Lords reform.

And Downing Street said it was still the prime minister's intention to have a Commons vote on boundary changes next year.

"It is the law," a spokesman said. "An Act of Parliament sets out the process. The Boundary Commissions are doing their work, they will report next year and after that there will be a vote in Parliament. That vote is required by the act."

Addressing MPs, Mr Clegg also said he would not support separate proposals put forward on the Lords by Lib Dem peer Lord Steel to make it easier for peers to retire and to be stripped of their membership for non-attendance.

He said these would not have the desired effect of reducing the size of the Lords and were "no surrogate for democracy".

For Labour, deputy leader Harriet Harman said Lords reform was "unfinished business" but criticised the government for failing to win over those with genuine concerns on all sides.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 122.

    This just shows that politicians are not really interested in democracy. They are just interested in their own interests and protecting the power base of their wealthy and hereditary peer friends.

    None of the major parties listen to the people or can be trusted to deliver on their election promises, so why bother voting for them?

  • rate this

    Comment number 102.

    By the way, the Upper House does not have to be directly elected.

    We have General Elections, and the percentage of Votes cast in that can decide who has what percentage of seats in the Upper House.

    No extra cost for extra elections, and an incentive for people who are in a constituency where their party will never get elected to go out and vote, as the vote will count towards the Upper House.

  • rate this

    Comment number 101.


    Now get on with legislation that deals with important issues.

    House of Lords reform.... Who cares? Seriously, if that is on your list of things you worry about, you should get out more.

    Like AV.... Cleggs other little project, nobody really cared. That's why a large majority told you to leave it alone.

  • rate this

    Comment number 97.

    A significant percentage of those in the lords do little or nothing, yet they cannot easily be removed. The lords should 'only' contain those who have been elected, and who must stand for re-election periodically. There should be no appointed lords. When that day comes I will start to take them seriously.

  • rate this

    Comment number 94.

    Whilst the country may be better run with a reformed House of Lords it does not need a second elected chamber in the style of the USA, where Political Parties fight to the detrement of the people. Recent history has shown that a non elected second chamber has tried to protect our rights better than the elected commons. Lets keep Politicians out of the second house.


Comments 5 of 9


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.