~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~28~RS~)
Nick Robinson
Political editor
Clegg's statement of intent
What does Nick Clegg mean when he talks in the Guardian of a new "time-limited contribution" by the wealthy?
My understanding is that he does not - yet, at least - have a specific measure in mind.
This is a statement of intent, directed partly at reassuring his party, partly at signalling to the country and partly to the Conservatives, that he will not allow the next phase of austerity to focus on the poorest in the land.
The chancellor signalled in his last Budget that he would be looking to cut the welfare bill by a further £10bn to meet the cuts made necessary by his earlier announcement that austerity would continue for two more years from 2015.
His main challenge may not be George Osborne, though. I'm told that before the last Budget the chancellor was willing to trade a cut in the top rate of income tax to 40p - not 45p as was announced - in return for agreeing to a version of the Lib Dems' Mansion Tax.
It was David Cameron who vetoed both ideas.
Deadly tornado hits Oklahoma City
Foot loose
Afrikaner agony
America's Latino future
Hoops and dreams
Be kind, rewind 
HARDtalk
Comment number 99.
GuillotinePete31st August 2012 - 0:08
77. nilihist
WPP CEO is one of the worst examples of the limitless greed of a beancounter extracting the maximum pecuniary gain for himself from the efforts of thousands of grateful employees. I am sure they will all contribute generously to an obelisk in his memory when he goes.
Seems we are going forward to the past. Memories of the Duke of Sutherland and Dunrobbin'.
.
Link to this (Comment number 99)
Comment number 98.
GuillotinePete30th August 2012 - 23:33
71. AndyC555
If in real terms average salaries fall by 10% and top salaries increase by 100% you'd consider that a success?
That is where Thatcher, Blair, Dave and Gideon have taken us and continue to take us.
It is not just salaries - it is all income, plus capital gains and inheritance that make the rich richer.
If the wealthy continue to cling to all the wealth where will it end?
Over to Karl
Link to this (Comment number 98)
Comment number 97.
Steve_M-H30th August 2012 - 22:23
"Only a redistribution of wealth will save the present economic woe."
Hmmm. I remember an old T shirt that used to say "Im a Mushroom... kept in the dark and fed Bulls***"
I think I see a parallel with that particular post.
"Progressive Analysis"......? Isnt that a euphemism for doing a proctoscopy with ones own head?
Link to this (Comment number 97)
Comment number 96.
The tin that rintitin30th August 2012 - 19:33
Thick as two short planks, you would never employ him would you? not even for a bit of a laugh!!!
Link to this (Comment number 96)
Comment number 95.
quietoaktree30th August 2012 - 17:39
#94 Mushroomfarmer
"Only a redistribution of wealth will save the present economic woe"
-then let´s begin with the National Trust and other such ´charities´
Link to this (Comment number 95)
Comments 5 of 99