MPs say too many celebrities get honours

Fred Goodwin MPs said the committee which removed Fred Goodwin's knighthood should be more transparent.

Related Stories

Too many civil servants, politicians and celebrities are receiving honours, a report by a group of MPs has said.

The Public Administration Select Committee called for a rise in honours for volunteers in the community.

Its report said an independent honours commission should be set up to remove political influence from the process.

The government denied honours were dominated by officials and celebrities, while Labour said it was vital the system's "independence" was maintained.

The committee criticised the way in which honours are granted, calling the process "opaque" and "mysterious".

Instead, the MPs called for increased transparency and accountability with a reduction in the influence of politicians and civil servants.

The committee's chairman, Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin, told the BBC: "The trend has been, over recent years, to remove the politicians from the direct control of the honours system and that process needs to be finished."

'Must stop'

"We believe that no-one should be honoured for simply 'doing the day job', no matter what that job is," the committee said.

Start Quote

While the honours system is a valued and popular part of British life, the fact that so few people understand how or why honours are awarded does nothing to help bolster public confidence or interest in the system”

End Quote Bernard Jenkin Committee chairman

"In particular, honours should not be awarded to civil servants or businessmen unless it can be demonstrated that there has been service above and beyond the call of duty.

"It is distasteful and damaging for people who already command vast personal remuneration packages for doing their job to also be honoured for simply being at the helm of large companies. This must stop."

As well as calling for an independent commission, the committee recommended the removal of the prime minister's "strategic direction" over the honours system.

It wants to see the publication of longer explanations of why someone has been given an honour and it calls on the Cabinet Office - the department responsible for honours - to broaden the range of independent members who currently sit on honours committees.

The Honours Forfeiture Committee, which stripped former Royal Bank of Scotland boss Fred Goodwin of his knighthood earlier this year, should be made independent with clearer rules and criteria.

At the moment it is run by a "shadowy group of senior civil servants, acting in secret," Mr Jenkin said.

The honours lists are published twice a year, at New Year and in mid-June on the date of the Queen's official birthday.

'Public confidence'

Earlier this month, a senior civil servant told the BBC that Team GB's Olympic medallists would not get an "automatic gong", sparking concerns there were plans to limit the number of athletes who will receive an honour in the New Year Honours list.

However, Downing Street denied this.

Mr Jenkin said: "The public values the honours system, and it commands a significant degree of public confidence, but people still say that honours appear to be awarded through a mysterious process by the various committees to the usual suspects they already know.

"Far too few are being awarded to ordinary citizens for the extraordinary contributions they make to their communities - which is what the honours system should be for.

"While the honours system is a valued and popular part of British life, the fact that so few people understand how or why honours are awarded does nothing to help bolster public confidence or interest in the system."

The Cabinet Office denied honours were dominated by politicians and celebrities, with 72% of the awards in the last honours list going to people who were actively involved in charitable or voluntary work.

"Honours are awarded on merit to those who make outstanding contributions and not for simply doing the day job," a spokesman said.

"Far from being the preserve of politicians, civil servants and celebrities, the vast majority go to the unsung heroes who do remarkable work in their communities.

"Awards are recommended by committees with independent chairs and a majority of independent members. We will carefully consider the committee's recommendations."

Michael Dugher, Labour's shadow Cabinet Office minister, said: "It is vitally important that the independence of the honours system is maintained.

"We welcome proposals for greater transparency, and for more recognition from within the system for people who do voluntary work in their communities."

Mr Dugher also said there should be greater recognition for public sector workers, not just for those in the top jobs in Whitehall.

"We also need an honours system that puts no artificial quota on extraordinary achievements or performances that contribute to this country," he said.


More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 417.

    Yes, gongs should continue for the worthy - and our Olympic sportemen and women are certainly worthy for their outstanding achievements.
    I agree that heads of industry, doing their job, are already seriously rewarded financially, so should only merit gongs for achievements that are of national benefit - not their own...!
    As for Knighthoods and Dames for actors and actresses...somewhat ludicrous..!

  • rate this

    Comment number 367.

    While the process for honours should be selective, it still needs to be viewed as attainable so that more people will aspire to the level necessary to get them. I think that more opportunities should be there for ordinary citizens to be recognised for exceptional service to the country in whatever capacity, be it aritistic, intellectual, ethical or otherwise.

  • rate this

    Comment number 349.

    Lets get down to the nitty gritty,the honours system is farce and laughing stock of the country.
    Lets get rid of it once and for all ,abolish it now.
    I am sick to the back teeth ,with the celebs and footballers ,and high paid bosses of companies,always there.
    The country do not hold the system in esteem or value,and have no respect for the people least Idont.

  • rate this

    Comment number 347.

    Honours should be a reflection of pride in the achievements of Britons. Personally, I take pride in great sporting, artistic, and intellectual achievements. So it seems I find myself in disagreement with the views expressed in the article, and by many other commenters. I see services to the community as a distant second compared to these achievements.

  • rate this

    Comment number 346.

    Honours should go to those whom society wants to flag up as role models. The question is how many of those who are to be honoured in the future have lived the kind of lives that we would want our children to emulate?
    Peerages should never be given as honours because they provide the recipient with the power to influence our laws.


Comments 5 of 13


More Politics stories



Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.