Apathy fears over police chief elections

 
Two police officers

It is now less than three months until the elections that form the centrepiece of what the Home Secretary Theresa May has called the "most radical reform of policing for 50 years"

For the first time across England and Wales, the people who appoint, and can ultimately dismiss, chief constables will be directly elected.

It is a idea that has had an elephantine gestation period.

As far back as 2003, some in Conservative circles were already talking about a plan they hoped could jump start the democratic accountability of police forces. Turbo charge scrutiny. Empower local people.

They said police authorities, those all but anonymous collections of councillors and local appointees, should be scrapped.

A directly elected figurehead would do the job instead.

Nine years on, those first elections are just 12 weeks away.

'Shambles'

The big challenge for the government is to convince people to turn out to vote, and hope the turnout isn't as dismal as the weather in November so often can be.

"It has been a shambles. They have decided to hold a winter election, even though we know that drives turnout down," Katie Ghose, the Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society told me.

"They are not providing information in the post as we'd like to see, even though seven million people don't have regular internet access."

Start Quote

In our democratic life we now have an important executive figure at local level”

End Quote Blair Gibbs Policy Exchange

Ms Ghose makes the case that a low turnout threatens to undermine the whole case for opening up police governance to direct public scrutiny.

Here is the central problem for ministers. Enthusing people, on a dark, cold and wet Thursday in November, to vote for someone for a position they may barely understand. And, to vote for someone to replace an authority they had probably never heard of.

"We are used to as a country not having a great deal of input to what is happening locally. Consequently it is unsurprising if the debate is not very developed," says Sam Chapman, editor of the Top of the Cops blog.

"Give the police and crime commissioner a couple of years and the debate will be very different from today. Any police commissioner will have more of mandate than any of the existing police authorities," he adds.

'Tensions'

Few dispute the scale of the change that is coming, even if awareness of it is limited. The new commissioners will have different outlooks and different personalities. Policing will have a different feel in different places.

"We will be looking at 41 mini experiments. They will all operate slightly differently. All the individuals elected will be different, the chief constables are different," Jon Collins, deputy director of the think tank the Police Foundation tells the BBC.

"There may be some where there are some tensions that cannot be resolved and in those cases we are likely to see chief constables moving on pretty soon."

Looking at the change through the prism of Westminster, it is likely to be chalked up as one of the most significant constitutional changes during the coalition's time in government.

"It is almost an extension of the franchise in some ways," said Blair Gibbs, research director for crime and justice at centre right think tank Policy Exchange.

"In our democratic life we now have an important executive figure at local level.

As a constitutional reform it is a legacy of the coalition government. But that is not just about governance. It is not an end in itself.

"If police and crime commissioners do their jobs well policing will improve and the streets will be safer," adds Mr Gibbs, who used to work for the Policing Minister Nick Herbert, added.

That contention, that policing will improve, is ultimately how the whole idea will be judged in the long term.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -9

    Comment number 13.

    ...anonymous collections of councillors and local appointees...
    ----

    Anyone getting involved in this initiative better watch their back unless they are "one of the boyz"

    Local administrations are nothing more than legalised gangsters

  • rate this
    -4

    Comment number 27.

    As soon as I heard that Joke Prescot had put his name forward I realised it was not worth bothering with. In principle it sounds like a good idea as we can boot themn out when they prioritise hiding behind bus shelters with radar guns over real crime but in reality, with jokers like brains prescot in charge it is going to go horribly wrong. The last ones to get the job should be those who apply.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 32.

    The whole idea is a contradiction in terms - a democratically elected Police Commissioner heading a public service riven by freemasonry. Some chance.

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 21.

    If voting for a local police chief was a good idea it would have been done 150 years ago. In the US it is questionable whether it actually works and of course it opens up another point of influence to corruption.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 12.

    Vote for everything!

    Politics by the double barrel full!

    Democracy for the sake of bureaucracy!

    Big Society! You’re in charge!

    (Wait… if were in charge then what are politicians for?)

 

Comments 5 of 48

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.