Labour re-instates Police Commissioner candidate
Labour has reinstated its Derbyshire Police Commissioner candidate Alan Charles
A more seasoned journalist colleague likes to remind me that August is the "silly season".
That's when the news prospects look thin and the news day feels really slow.
The tell-tale sign is usually the first Loch Ness Monster story.
But this August, the headlines have been pepped up wonderfully by the Olympics.
And for me, they have been enlivened by the early stages of an election campaign that's hardly registering on most people's radar.
Teething problemsElections for our first Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) aren't until the middle of November.
They'll be the politicians charged with bringing the local police to account; also hiring and firing chief constables if necessary.
“Start Quote
End Quote Labour Party statementJuvenile convictions for imprisonable offences will bar people from becoming a police and crime commissioner”
Yet this novel but significant role appears to be having teething problems.
Take Labour's difficulties in Derbyshire.
Its candidate, Alan Charles, fell on his sword. He stood down because of a conviction as a juvenile almost 50 years ago.
He may have been a vice-chairman of Derbyshire's Police Authority for three years and a respected county councillor for 20 years.
But Alan Charles was briefed that his offence ruled him out as a PCC candidate.
Juvenile convictions for imprisonable offences will bar people from becoming a police and crime commissioner.
At that stage, he said: "The Labour Party has only received clarification from the Home Office and the Electoral Commission that juvenile convictions for imprisonable offences will bar people from becoming a police and crime commissioner."
He had been given a 12 months conditional discharge.
The offence? That has yet to be disclosed by Councillor Charles or the Labour Party.
Legal challengeIn an exercise of damage limitation, Labour gave the nod to the media that Hardyal Dhindsa, a Derby City councillor, would be the replacement candidate. And in quick time too.
“Start Quote
End Quote Latest Labour Party statementIt has become clear that he is eligible to become a Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) candidate”
To get away from it all, Alan Charles headed off for a holiday on the East Yorkshire coast.
But it now transpires that the county councillor didn't have his head in a bag of seaside fish and chips.
He had been consulting with senior Labour legal advisers.
Was the coalition's legislation, which set up PCCs, legally watertight and could it be challenged?
I don't know the answer to that. What is clear now is that Alan Charles is back.
He's been reinstated as Labour's official PCC candidate for Derbyshire.
Hardyal Dhindsa is certainly perplexed, as will be the voters of Derbyshire.
Eligibility questionsLabour now says: "Due to a distinct lack of clarity from the Home Office, we have sought further legal advice on behalf of Alan Charles, and it has become clear that he is eligible to become a Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) candidate.
"The Labour Party has written to the Home Office calling for them to urgently provide more information and much greater clarity on the interpretation of their legislation for all involved in these elections.
Derbyshire - known candidates
- Labour : Alan Charles
- Conservative: Simon Spencer
"Therefore Alan Charles is Labour candidate for PCC in Derbyshire."
So Labour is sticking by its original choice of candidate.
It has also thrown a gauntlet down to challenge one of David Cameron's pet projects.
Alan Charles will be back from the seaside soon enough and returns to the campaign trail in Derbyshire.
He could be making news for the rest of August... unless the Loch Ness Monster beats him to it.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~04~RS~)




Karzai to boycott Taliban talks
Jumpstarting Motor City
Baby on board
Warning from history
Patchy record
On the move in Mumbai
Comment number 3.
ashto517th August 2012 - 15:44
So more money will be wasted by the political elite and the lawyers on working out issues that should have been dealt with in the first instance.
Is it me or is it the elite seem to be more estranged from real life?
Little wonder no one votes any more :(
Link to this (Comment number 3)
Comment number 2.
G Paul Turner16th August 2012 - 22:40
S66(4): “imprisonable offence” means an offence — for which a person who has attained the age of 18 years may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Bad drafting: does it mean only an adult can be barred, or a kid who would be imprisoned if he had committed the crime as an adult? Far more reasonable clause 67(3)(c) of the Bill - been imprisoned for more than 3 months in the last 5 years.
Link to this (Comment number 2)
Comment number 1.
Geoff76516th August 2012 - 16:39
This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Link to this (Comment number 1)