Midland Mainline rail deal almost derailed by Treasury

 
Midland Mainline train The improvements to the Midland Mainline will be the biggest since the Victorians built the railway

The smiles were unmistakeable. Some of the leading local politicians from the East Midlands were celebrating.

After years of intense lobbying, the government had finally agreed to a multi-million pound scheme to electrify the Midland Mainline.

Job done.

They were gathering for the annual meeting of East Midlands' Councils, the influential group that lobbies for the region.

It had thought the electrification case was in the bag.

Last minute scares

But I've learned that the biggest investment in the Midland Mainline since the Victorians built it was almost scuppered.

Also threatened was the promise of cutting journey times from the East Midlands to London St Pancras.

This was because of last minute objections from the Treasury - officials were unhappy at the price tag.

Midland Mainline fact file

St Pancras station
  • Electrification - £500 million
  • Upgrade - £300 million
  • Links East Midlands to Yorkshire and London St Pancras

It took last gasp political lobbying of the Chancellor of the Exchequer to secure the entire project.

I understand that just a few days before last week's announcement by the Cabinet, Treasury officials were reluctant to give the scheme their full backing.

Electrification between the East Midlands and London St Pancras was estimated at £500 million.

But an additional £300 million was needed to improve journey times by smoothing out three so-called 'pinch points' on the line near Derby, Leicester and Melton Mowbray.

It was those improvements that Treasury officials wanted to chop.

Keeping on track

Whispers of Treasury objections spurred the Loughborough Conservative MP Nicky Morgan into last ditch one-to-one lobbying of Chancellor George Osborne.

"We had to make the case very forcibly with the Treasury," she told me.

"I said if you are going to do the electrification, you also must have the upgrade at the same time, otherwise it costs more money in the long term.

Start Quote

Nicky Morgan MP

We had to make the case very forcibly with the Treasury”

End Quote Nicky Morgan (Cons) MP Loughborough

"That case was understood by the Secretary of State for Transport, Justine Greening, and Business Secretary, Vince Cable, but ultimately it was the Chancellor I had to convince."

After a Cabinet meeting in Smethwick, Vince Cable arrived at Leicester Station to announce the go-ahead.

But only a few political insiders knew of the dramatic last minute talks to keep the entire project on track.

"The government clearly realises the need for investment in infrastructure, but every £100 or £200 million is another chunk of money to be found," added Nicky Morgan.

"That's why they were right to push us."

Electrification is now a done-deal, but we are learning that it was a close run thing.

Nicky Morgan says the economic case persuaded the Chancellor.

But with so many Conservative marginal seats clustered around the Midland Mainline, politics could also have been a factor.

 
John Hess, Political editor, East Midlands Article written by John Hess John Hess Political editor, East Midlands

Count down to war: 100 years on

Were politics really that much different 100 years ago, as Britain faced going to war?

Read full article

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 5.

    Ah the simple answers are the best - add a few more carriages per train - how simple! Shame the trains then won't fit in the stations on a network that is groaning at the seams already. All these other countries that have built and are extending their High Speed networks must be wrong!

    Reduce business travel and use more IT saving perhaps 5% of rail journeys and many company cars.

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 4.

    HS2 & electrifying the e.mids line = Millions spent & meagre improvement on journey time into London. Adding a few more carriages to each train = Less cost than above,improved passenger well being & the opportunity for those who want to work on the train, to be more productive.
    Is it not that simple?

  • rate this
    -2

    Comment number 3.

    Small minds that can't think out of the box. Improving the rail network/making trains go faster wont solve the problem. you need to remove the need to travel! Too many people traveling just to sit in an office or attend a meeting.

    Too many professional politicians that have never lived/worked in the real world and frankly haven't a clue.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 2.

    The cost per passenger for these projects will be a hell of a lot better than the cost per passenger on HS2.
    Putting money into the whole rail system will help a lot more people than one line with very few stops.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 1.

    Ozzy does not seem to be doing very well in the media at present. At least this was not another U turn. Improving the infrastructure is a growth engine and it is important to adopt a more long term view, as for the voters issue, it is politics what can you do?

 
 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.