Key Cameron ally urges scrapping of universal pensioner benefits


Key Cameron ally, Nick Boles, urges scrapping of universal pensioner benefits ahead of next election - watch Allegra's Newsnight report

Related Stories

A close ally of the prime minister is calling for the winding up of universal benefits to better off pensioners at the next election as he urges a shift to only policies which he believes will raise the productivity and competitiveness of the UK's workforce.

Conservative MP Nick Boles is also urging a significant further scaling back of tax credits and housing benefit, and a re-examination of the "lazy sentimentalism" of the Sure Start programme of children's centres.

Mr Boles will appear on Newsnight on Monday to propose ways his party can best address the decline in living standards, faltering in the UK for the last decade.

Previewing ideas he will set out in full with a speech on Tuesday to the independent Resolution Foundation - whose work is devoted to diagnosing the problems affecting low to middle income earners - Mr Boles proposes a philosophical shift that should guide the next round of spending cuts due for 2013 or 2014.

He will say that only those tax and spending policies that can explicitly be seen to increase competitiveness of the UK workforce should be supported.

The ultra-modernising MP has worked alongside the current Conservative leadership since opposition.

He founded the think tank Policy Exchange - a petri dish of ideas for the Conservative leadership - and though the ideas in his speech to the Resolution Foundation are his own, he is close to many leading members of the government and suggests the next wave of Conservative ideas being contemplated as all parties consider further public spending cuts.

His proposal to re-evaluate the effectiveness of Sure Start will be uncomfortable for his Liberal Democrat coalition partners. Mr Boles is the parliamentary private secretary to Schools Minister Nick Gibb, in the education department which has oversight over Sure Start.

Mr Boles has devoted much energy to considering the issues affecting those on low to middle incomes as they struggle to keep their earning power up in the face of downward trends in earnings and living standards afflicting all developed economies.

In his speech Mr Boles will say: "It is my contention that politicians - of all parties - have barely begun to wrestle with the implications of the stagnation in living standards or confront the agonising choices that we will be forced to make in the decades to come."

He believes:

  • The housing benefit budget, which has risen to £22bn a year, should be cut further: "I challenge anyone to show that this is the most cost-effective way to help people into work or to tackle our generational failure to provide enough affordable homes for our growing population."
  • Non-pension benefits - Winter Fuel Allowance, free bus travel, free prescriptions and free TV licences for the over 75s - for better-off pensioners should go in 2015: "Does anyone here think it would be responsible for a country in our financial position to go on giving free TV licences to Sir Michael Winner, free eye tests to Lord Sugar and a winter fuel allowance to Sir Paul McCartney after 2015?"
  • On child tax credits: "They do little to help parents get into work and nothing to incentivise them to take steps to improve their capacity to command a decent wage in future." "Does anyone really believe that the best way of helping the next generation escape poverty and build better futures for themselves is to spend £30bn on financial transfers to their parents and only £5bn on education for the under 5s."
  • On Sure Start costing £1.1bn a year: "Many might think that Sure Start would be a good candidate for more money. But I am afraid that would be to perpetuate the kind of lazy sentimentalism that has seen so much taxpayer's money wasted over the last decade."

"If we are going to make any difference to the future productivity of working people and the competitiveness of our economy, we must abandon this soggy approach and demand that the programmes we invest in have a substantial and measurable impact. Otherwise, we should leave the money in the hands of taxpayers, from whence it came," Mr Boles will say.

"Productivity and competitiveness are my lodestars because I am convinced that the only way that we can restore sustained improvement in living standards is if most working people in Britain can command high and steadily increasing wages in the market place.

"It may be true that, for some, total household income has continued to grow because a previously unemployed partner has started work or one or both partners have increased the number of hours they work.

"It may also be true that increased financial transfers by government have helped many people on low pay enjoy rising incomes despite the stagnation in their wages. But it seems obvious to me that neither of these trends is sustainable - and, even if they were, we should not want them to be sustained.

"What will it do for our health and happiness (let alone that of our children) if the only way to achieve a growing income is to work longer hours? And which of us really believes that any government will be able to expand every year the amount of money it gives to those whose wages have stalled?" he goes on.

He will also challenge the Labour leadership to reveal which taxes they would raise to reconcile their public spending pledges with their declared commitment to deficit reduction.

Mr Boles becomes the most senior of modernisers around the prime minister to endorse the scrapping of benefits for the elderly, as well as proposing a delay in bringing in social care.

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has said before that universal benefits for the elderly might have to go, but in a recent speech on welfare the prime minister ruled out ending them within this Parliament.

Allegra Stratton Article written by Allegra Stratton Allegra Stratton Political editor, BBC Newsnight

Lib Dems push for early 2015 Budget to stop Tory 'giveaway'

The Lib Dems want the 2015 Budget to be brought forward to stop the chancellor using it as a pre-election giveaway, BBC Newsnight understands.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 16.

    Look I am 32, I work, pay my taxes, and receive no benefits, but that’s because I work, I expect to have some of my taxes back at retirement, but if the already well off keep taking and living much longer, my generation will end up paying the older generations benefits this is wrong, after 16 years benefits should be reduced, this would represent the benefits I received from childhood to work.

  • rate this

    Comment number 36.

    Nick Boles is absolutely right with non-pension benefits. I'm sure there are many people who use the Winter Fuel Payments to spend on other things than paying for the high cost of heating during the winter months. This, like Child Benefit, should be means tested and only given to the people who need it.

  • rate this

    Comment number 20.

    Look at the demographics and epidemiology stats folks, we simply can't afford this any more. Benefits are a key part of a supportive democratic society that cares, but for the sake of everyone we simply have to means test. I wish the socialists would wake up and get this or we'll all end up with nothing.

  • rate this

    Comment number 111.

    Sorry but I am against universal benefits - whilst shooting myself in the foot, it is just wrong, nice but not needed. The welfare state was supposed to be for the poor. I am retired, and my pension at around £25k is earned.. My home, mortagage paid off is my security for dotage. My kids, will get what is left.
    Nice to have extras but needed - no. .

  • rate this

    Comment number 116.

    Standard left wing tax blah blah....

    Yes point taken...put a few million in the kitty I suppose. Not an answer though is it? Drop in a financial ocean.

    And then...but you cannot target oaps. Or children. Or unemployed. Or disabled. Or....well anyone except millionaires.

    Wake up. It's 2012, universal welfare costs to much, it will have to become leaner and meaner!


Comments 5 of 346



Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.