David Cameron on welfare: An unusual sort of speech


It's an unusual sort of speech.

This morning David Cameron says, in effect: "I'm in charge of the country. I have already promised radical welfare cuts which have yet to be implemented or examined for their impact but here's the sort of thing I'd want to do in three years time if you re-elect me without the need to rely on those pesky Liberals - but don't push me on the details yet."

So, why is he doing it?

There will be many theories, but here's just a few. It cheers up Tories in the week they're being asked to stomach Lib Dem plans to reform the Lords without a referendum; it gives Conservatives a way to highlight what they'd do if only they could; it helps get the Tory press back on side after the so-called omnishambles Budget and it poses real problems for Labour just as the housing benefit cap did.

There is, though, one reason above all others which the Westminster village too easily forgets and is the key to all the rest - it's popular.

A recent YouGov poll for Prospect magazine suggested a startling 74% of the public - including 59% of Labour voters and 51% of those on the lowest incomes (below £10,000) - thought that welfare payments should be cut. The most popular cuts are for, you guessed it, the unemployed and never-married single parents. The least popular cuts are for the elderly.

The prime minister is using his position to spark a debate which he already knows he's won. Asked about the specifics he will, no doubt, do as Iain Duncan Smith did this morning and say "these are the details... that's the challenge... we'll have to be careful ...etc"

One important note. David Cameron was careful to say - in the advance text we've seen so far - that he'd keep his promise to pensioners not to means-test their benefits, but Iain Duncan Smith made it absolutely clear that that promise lasts just for this Parliament - in other words not for the period the speech is talking about.

Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

UKIP - power struggle, not soap opera

All the bizarre news stories that have emerged from UKIP in recent days reflect a power struggle within a party that aspires to hold the balance of power after the next election.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 518.


    No need to fear trapped in village, dependent on weekly or harvest share-out

    National Equal Income would need 'approvals' (colleges, supervisors, employers, accountants, etc), but creative elasticity both needed and possible esp for the younger and the dissatisfied

    One thing to take risks of 'less', to pursue dreams: quite another to feel excluded though willing

  • rate this

    Comment number 517.

    516 Sorry AFA - got bored. I suspect we could live comfortably together in a small village that either could leave when pissed off. At national level - forget it. As I have already observed somethings dont scale and when it comes to the state - less is more.

  • rate this

    Comment number 516.

    feedback @509
    "the last 60 years"

    To be 'sweeping': we lived off the land, by favour of lords, by rent of land, ever more inter-dependent, 'insured' by community (whether from tithes, charities, subscriptions, taxes or protected savings)

    Now, we 'live off our share of currency', however bargained or husbanded

    But 'undemocratic rules' play tricks, not least in licences to print debt

    Your move

  • rate this

    Comment number 515.

    Andy @510
    "the left"?

    Claire is looking for a home, not an indoctrination!

    Just as a house needs SOUND bricks, civilisation needs sound people
    Understanding & accepting logical conditions for VIABLE democracy
    NOT divided & ruled by Fear & Greed

    If all others agreed, would you demand special reward?

    Why represent Full Employment as "no effort"?

    Why pretend OK for 51% to enslave 49%, or worse?

  • rate this

    Comment number 514.

    The rates are not as good as David Cameron and co would have us beleave for most people


Comments 5 of 518



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.