Jeremy Hunt denies Labour's claim he lied to Parliament

 

Labour's Chris Bryant accuses Jeremy Hunt of telling lies to MPs

Related Stories

Jeremy Hunt has denied Labour claims that he lied to Parliament over his handling News Corp's proposed takeover of BSkyB, amid furious scenes in the House of Commons.

MPs also rejected a call for an inquiry into whether the culture secretary broke ministerial rules.

Labour's Chris Bryant said Mr Hunt had deliberately misled MPs over his contacts with News Corp.

But Mr Hunt rejected the claim, saying the evidence had "vindicated" him.

Labour's motion, calling for the culture secretary to be referred to an inquiry by Sir Alex Allan, the prime minister's adviser on the ministerial code, was defeated by 290 to 252 votes.

This was despite Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg ordering his Liberal Democrat MPs to abstain.

'Calculated'

David Cameron has refused to refer Mr Hunt to his adviser, saying there is no evidence that he acted improperly in his handling of the BSkyB bid.

In March 2011, Mr Hunt said all correspondence relating to the BSkyB bid had been made public.

David Cameron was quizzed over Leveson and Jeremy Hunt by Ed Miliband

But, during the debate, Labour claimed this had been proven wrong by the subsequent release of emails and text messages by the Leveson Inquiry into media standards.

Mr Bryant, the shadow immigration minister, accused Mr Hunt of lying to Parliament by failing to disclose a memo which he had sent to the prime minister days before being given responsibility for the BSkyB bid, in which he argued the case for News Corp to be allowed to buy up the 61% of the satellite broadcaster which it did not already own.

Mr Bryant listed examples when he said Mr Hunt could have corrected the official record but had chosen not to, arguing this meant he had "deliberately" misled MPs.

He said: "How much would it have cost you to remember that you sent a memo to the prime minister on the matter, or, for that matter, to have checked your own mobile phone for the text messages that you sent to James Murdoch? You have lied to Parliament."

Labour argues that Mr Hunt was not objective in his handling of the takeover, but an active supporter of the News Corp bid for BSkyB and should therefore resign.

But Mr Hunt told MPs he had corrected the record last September over his March 2011 statement, saying: "I have made huge efforts to be transparent and you know that perfectly well."

He said: "If, as he [Mr Bryant] said, I had a plan, a grand scheme, that was going to deliver BSkyB to News Corp, why would I say that I am going to ask independent regulators, whose advice I have absolutely no control over... for their opinion and I was going to publish that at the same I time I was going to publish my decision?

"The reason I did that is that I was setting aside the views I had prior to the bid taking place and that has been vindicated by every page of his evidence."

He called Mr Bryant's statement that he had lied a "disgraceful allegation".

Liberal Democrat leader and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg ordered his MPs to abstain in the vote on Mr Hunt.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +142

    Comment number 665.

    Some people are commenting 'who cares?'

    I do...because this is all about how powerful people in big corporate business influence govt policies.

    Govt policy should not be influenced by back-handers, special favours and threats from large corporations that have their own agenda. This is to the detriment of all of us directly or indirectly.

  • rate this
    +64

    Comment number 424.

    357Assynt

    This is a waste of public money & parlimentary time to pander to a Labour smear tactic to sling mud and hope some of it sticks
    -
    The mud has already stuck.

    If Cameron had ordered an enquiry straight off & Hunt had nothing to hide / fear, there would be nothing for the mud to stick to.

    By taking the current approach they appear to have something to hide which they don't want exposed.

  • rate this
    -106

    Comment number 72.

    55.graham09
    1 Minute Ago
    Guilty or not, this shows a real lack of leadership from No. 10, an inability to judge the mood of the public and a disregard for the spirit of the ministerial code.

    Leadership requires you to stand by your friends and allies and not throw them to the mob everytime it requires entertainment!

  • rate this
    -128

    Comment number 44.

    Given the current state of this country, are there not more important subjects that should be discussed by our politicians?

    Labour's answer to everything seems to be let's spend more of the money we don't have and hold an enquiry.

  • rate this
    +142

    Comment number 40.

    I could have written the script weeks ago. Another cover up and the spineless Lib Dems sitting on the fence, keeping their heads down. Wake up and smell the coffee. The country is waiting for you to do something positive and salvage some of the identity you have lost in this sham of a government. It may be your last chance!
    It's time Cameron was brought down a peg or two and you can do it!

 

Comments 5 of 11

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.