IMF – Backing Plan A or calling for Plan B?

 

Stand by for the latest utterances of the IMF about the state of the UK economy to be scoured for evidence of support for the government's Plan A or backing for Labour's calls for a Plan B.

The fact that the chancellor is rolling out the red carpet for the Fund's managing director Christine Lagarde suggests that George Osborne is pretty confident that what she'll say is helpful. In truth, whoever is head of the IMF has to be a diplomat and has to maintain good relations with the world's finance ministers in order to persuade them to stump up the funds the IMF needs.

It's worth remembering that the IMF praised Gordon Brown's stewardship of the British economy.

It is the IMF's economists who occasionally slip in hints of criticism to their reports. In the past year they've suggested that the UK should consider changing its plans if growth slows.

In September last year the IMF said: "If activity were to undershoot current expectations, countries that face historically low yields (such as Germany and the UK) should also consider delaying some of their planned adjustment," ie the speed of cuts. Of course, the chancellor then went on to add another two years to his deficit reduction plan in his Autumn Statement.

In January of this year the IMF's chief economist Olivier Blanchard told the BBC that "if growth is really dismal then you may decide that you're going to go a bit more slowly about the discretionary part of the budget" before adding that "to the extent that these countries are not under the gun from the markets, have plausible medium term plans, they can slow down and it would help".

So, support for Labour then? Well, not if you went on a few sentences when he added "there's another issue which is if you have announced the plan and you deviate from the plan you may lose credibility. So given that the UK has announced the plan moving from it is a bit more difficult than it might be for another country".

In other words, slowing down the cuts/tax rises might help growth but also might risk credibility in the markets and lead to a rise in interest rates.

So, the IMF was helpfully saying to the government 'this is a tricky judgement with upsides and downsides whatever you do'. Or, to quote the editor in my favourite movie about journalism "The Paper" - "You have a problem but, you know what, it's your problem."

 
Nick Robinson, Political editor Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

A relationship on the rocks

David Cameron is exasperated with his party for being stuck in its old ways. They fear that he never really loved them at all.

Read full article

More on This Story

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 19.

    The last refuge for supporters of an incompetent, failing Government - blame the BBC (I don't work for it). Sooner rather than later Cameron and co will accept the argument for stimulus/growth if not for economic reasons (although it's the obvious course) but for electoral reasons.Meantime,game,set and match to Mr Balls for informed analysis and proposed action.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 18.

    The report a) undeniably backs what the government are doing and b) sets out some options if (repeat if) things get worse. The BBC have gone to exrtraordinary lengths to deemphasise a) and emphasise b). The level of bias in the BBC has reached wholly unacceptable levels.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 17.

    I agree with Apetime, shame we cannot reinvest their profits....Wait a minute we can, it is called nationalisation. Seems to be all the rage in Nationalist and Marxist South America, Nationalise a few Chinese owned companies and they will punish us by not sending their shoddy home grown manufactured goods here. Thats a fair exchange considering the profits in uk seep back to china.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 16.

    The biggest factor in causing our debts to reach the levels they have is the recapitalisation of the banks that got caught up in the american sub prime crash.

    Despite investing in the public sector our debt was lower than that of the Major government that sold energy, water and rail companies into privatisation.
    Shame we can't reinvest their profits eh.

    Lets not forget the minimum wage to.

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 15.

    Start with the quote "No more boom and bust". Labour encouraged a boom completely based on consumer and government debt. In the good times it is fantastic, continual growth (below EU average though). However we have little to show for this. He enjoyed the benefits but was complacent to the risks he exposed the economy to. The economy was waiting for a hurdle to crash over.

 

Comments 5 of 19

 

Features & Analysis

Elsewhere on BBC News

  • Reading e-bookA novel idea?

    How US libraries are responding to the change from printed books to digital publishing

BBC © 2013 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.