Rupert Murdoch 'not a fit person' to lead News Corp - MPs


The MPs were "misled repeatedly", says chairman John Whittingdale

Rupert Murdoch "is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company", MPs have said.

The culture committee questioned journalists and bosses at the now-closed News of the World, as well as police and lawyers for hacking victims.

Its report has concluded that Mr Murdoch exhibited "wilful blindness" to what was going on in News Corporation.

But the committee was split six to four with Tory members refusing to endorse the report and branding it "partisan".

Conservative Louise Mensch called it "a real great shame" that the report's credibility had potentially been "damaged" as a result, with the report carried by Labour and Lib Dem members backing it.

News Corp said in a statement it was "carefully reviewing" the report and would "respond shortly", adding: "The company fully acknowledges significant wrongdoing at News of the World and apologises to everyone whose privacy was invaded."

The committee itself does not have the power to impose sanctions, but it raised the possibility of a vote in the House of Commons about whether witnesses had been in contempt of Parliament - and if so, whether those witnesses should be forced to apologise in Parliament.

Start Quote

It will give ammunition to those News Corporation shareholders who would like to loosen the hold over the company of the Murdoch dynasty”

End Quote

The BBC News Channel's chief political correspondent Norman Smith said the report was much more damning than had been anticipated and directly questioned the integrity and honesty of Rupert Murdoch.

BBC business editor Robert Peston said it would push Ofcom, the media regulator, closer to the conclusion that BSkyB - 39% owned by News Corp - is not fit and proper to hold a broadcasting licence.

Reacting to the report, an Ofcom spokesman said it was "continuing to assess the evidence - including the new and emerging evidence" that may assist it in ruling on that issue.

'A blind eye'

The committee of MPs began its inquiry in July 2011 in the wake of fresh revelations about the extent of hacking at the tabloid newspaper, with reported victims including the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and the families of victims of the 7/7 London bombings.

It heard evidence from Mr Murdoch and his son James, and has now concluded that the notion that a hands-on proprietor like Rupert Murdoch had "no inkling" that wrongdoing was widespread at the News of the World was "simply not credible".

It noted that the newspaper mogul had "excellent powers of recall and grasp of detail when it suited him", and added: "On the basis of the facts and evidence before the committee, we conclude that, if at all relevant times Rupert Murdoch did not take steps to become fully informed about phone hacking, he turned a blind eye and exhibited wilful blindness to what was going on in his companies and publications."

Tory MPs objected specifically to the line branding Mr Murdoch "not fit", with one, Philip Davies, telling a press conference the committee had seen "absolutely no evidence" to endorse such a "completely ludicrous" conclusion.

But Labour MP Tom Watson said "more than any individual alive", Mr Murdoch was to blame for phone hacking, and it was right to "raise the bar" of the report and make that clear.

The committee also criticised three former News International executives - one-time executive chairman Les Hinton, former News of the World editor Colin Myler and former legal manager Tom Crone - accusing them of giving misleading evidence.

Mr Myler, who is now editor of the New York Daily News, said he had "always sought to be accurate and consistent" when speaking to the committee and stood by his evidence.

Mr Hinton said the allegations against him were "unfounded, unfair and erroneous".

Mr Crone said he accepted there were "valid criticisms of my conduct in this matter", but he was "the subject of serious allegations which lack foundation".

Foam attack

News Corp as a whole was guilty of "huge failings of corporate governance" and, throughout, its instinct had been "to cover up rather than seek out wrongdoing and discipline the perpetrators", the committee said.

Phone-hacking probes

  • Leveson Inquiry - judicial probe into press standards, investigating the extent of unlawful or improper conduct at News International and other newspaper groups. It will also examine the original police probe into phone hacking
  • Operation Weeting - police investigation into alleged phone-hacking at News of the World
  • Operation Elveden - police investigation into inappropriate payments to officers
  • Operation Tuleta - police investigation into allegations of computer hacking
  • Civil action by alleged hacking victims. Thousands of potential victims identified and several, including singer Charlotte Church, already awarded damages

And it concluded: "Corporately, the News of the World and News International misled the committee about the true nature and extent of the internal investigations they professed to have carried out in relation to phone hacking; by making statements they would have known were not fully truthful; and by failing to disclose documents which would have helped expose the truth."

James Murdoch told the committee last summer that he did not see an email which suggested that hacking was more widespread at the paper than previously acknowledged - a claim disputed by Mr Myler and Mr Crone in their evidence.

On that matter, the report concluded that James Murdoch was "consistent" in relation to the so-called "For Neville" email, but he had demonstrated "wilful ignorance" about what had been going on, which "clearly raises questions of competence" on his part.

James Murdoch has insisted he did not know about any wrongdoing at the News of the World, but took "his share" of responsibility for not uncovering it earlier.

He gave evidence alongside his father Rupert, who at one point during the hearing was attacked by a man who rushed forward from the public gallery and threw a paper plate of foam at him.

James and Rupert Murdoch James and Rupert Murdoch appeared before the media committee last July

The committee also said former News of the World editor Rebekah Brooks must "accept responsibility" for presiding over a culture at the News of the World that led to journalists impersonating members of Milly Dowler's family and hacking the teenager's phone.

And it criticised Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer and former Acting Deputy Commissioner at the Metropolitan Police John Yates for failing to ensure hacking claims were properly investigated.

After initially claiming malpractice was limited to one "rogue" reporter at the News of the World, News International has now settled dozens of civil cases admitting liability for hacking between 2001 and 2006.

More than 6,000 possible victims have been identified and the police have so far made a number of arrests in connection with an investigation reopened in January 2011 - although no charges have yet been brought.

Asked whether David Cameron regarded Rupert Murdoch as a fit person to run a media company, his official spokesman said: "That is a matter for the regulatory authorities, not for the government."

Labour leader Ed Miliband and Lib Dem Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg both said Ofcom must now be allowed to come to its own conclusion.

The hacking revelations led to the closure of the News of the World and the government's decision to set up a judicial inquiry into press standards headed by Lord Leveson.

Appearing before the Leveson Inquiry last week, Rupert Murdoch said there had been a "cover-up" which "shielded" senior figures at the paper and its parent company - including himself and his son James - from knowledge of wrongdoing taking place.



This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • Comment number 707.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 706.

    Sounds like the pot calling the Kettle black, I can think of a lot of MP's and Cabinet Ministers that are not fit to lead the Country.

  • rate this

    Comment number 705.

    At last the leaders of Britain have come to realise how anti-British News International is. This company has corrupted one of the most important crime fighting organisations in the world. The British seemed to have been bamboozled by the display of the Union flag and boobs to the detriment of democracy. The company should be as popular in Britain as the Sun is in Liverpool.

  • rate this

    Comment number 704.

    Does this come as a surprise? Witch hunt? Kangaroo court (no joke intended)? And hardly a damning indictment given the split. And what will we deduce if the Levenson enquiry comes to a different conclusion? And since when have MPs had the moral high ground to sit and judge anyone?

  • Comment number 703.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 702.

    I have no love for the guy but haven't we just found the ultimate straw man...? Media too close to Government? We've been using the media to mould the views of our citizens since Colonial times. Murdoch must be one of the most powerful men alive, but he is not the first to wield that power. And one doesn't get to be the Godfather of a man's child without some degree of intimacy...

  • rate this

    Comment number 701.

    Hang on a minute - News International is a business and as such what right does any MP have to say who should and should not run it. Someone somewhere seems to have gotten out of touch with the issue here. People engaged in an illegal activity. If the company bosses knew about this, then they are responsible. If they did not, then the management is and prosecutions take place. A waste of money.

  • rate this

    Comment number 700.

    When they start blocking porn at source, and you have to ask for it, hacking celebrities phones will have just been the warm-up act. Maybe it won't, if the people who read the NOW have to register.

  • rate this

    Comment number 699.

    "The Murdochs may certainly be dissembling and mendacious, but how any MP would know enough about global busines to make a judgement of fitness in the circumstances is quite beyond me."

    If one of your businesses doing millions of pounds in criminal activity doesn't attract your attention even after convictions of your staff, you being unfit for your job seems totally obvious.

  • rate this

    Comment number 698.

    Everyone is having a go at Murdoch and the Government (quite rightly) ..... but meanwhile the police role in all of this seems to have been forgotten.

  • rate this

    Comment number 697.

    It takes a certain type to rise to the very top. People who lack empathy, people who have no fault find to find with themselves, people whose arrogance carries them through "where angels fear to tread." Sadly we keep promoting these people and voting for them, then we are surprised when they break the law or invade Iraq or crash the bank.

  • rate this

    Comment number 696.

    I suspect a rather large number of the comments on here are from people paid to advance the Murdoch position - nothing else could explain the crass stupidity.

  • rate this

    Comment number 695.

    The birdman wouldn't feed the pigeons if they didn't want the bread. If the birdman threw pebbles the pigeons wouldn't gather.

    But if the bread is just 'right' for the pigeons, they develop a special liking for the birdman's fodder & vice versa in the birdman for the pigeons appreciating his bread.

    But if the pigeons now puke the bread, don't be surprised if the birdman does not return.

  • rate this

    Comment number 694.

    Are we witnessing a falling of the Berlin Wall Style of event ?

  • rate this

    Comment number 693.

    The Dowler story is one that is usally taken completely out of context. So they hacked her phone - so what? Would the whole of the country not have been patting NI on the back if they had tracked her down alive?
    Just remember that it was the police who owned up to deleting her messages - a fact lots of people conveniently forget as it spoils their story.

  • rate this

    Comment number 692.

    After being told we can't believe what we read in the papers; it now transpires that actually it was true and substantiated.

    Now all the deniers have their snouts in the great compensation trough.

    I'm not against phone hacking, or other covert means to uncover legitimate stories. If the end justifies the means; the issue is what is and is not newsworthy.

    Who will stop MP's running riot?

  • rate this

    Comment number 691.

    When the dust settles, the only people to come out of this with any honour will be the people of Liverpool.

  • rate this

    Comment number 690.

    607. Tsunami of Logi
    Absolutely correct.. But the biggest hypocrisy is yet again, the Socialist Raptors are only scramming because their snouts are out of the Trough !! not much Screaming when that Buffoon Brown
    and that Arch Scoundrel Blair and his ''Sell out the Nation to fill her pockets wife'' where contentedly chewing the Cud eh !!

  • rate this

    Comment number 689.

    84:HW:Given that CBS created a false news story to try to help Kerry beat Bush, I think you are confused about who was making up US news then. FoxNews isn't on regular airwaves, only cable by subscription where government has no legal say. And the local Fox station covers local news so you have to subscribe to their cable station or listen to others if you want national news.

  • rate this

    Comment number 688.

    On another note.... Louise Mensch..... very tidy


Page 28 of 63


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.