Labour 'disappointed' as Galloway hails Bradford West win

 

George Galloway: "There's a massive well of dissatisfaction in this country"

Related Stories

George Galloway has said his surprise victory in the Bradford West by-election showed the "alienation" of voters from the main political parties.

The Respect Party politician said his win also reflected concerns about jobs and the economy - and was not just based on the support of Muslim voters.

Labour's Ed Miliband said the loss of the seat was "incredibly disappointing"

He said "local factors" were partly to blame but pledged to "learn lessons" from the defeat.

But the BBC's chief political correspondent Norman Smith said the poll, coming at the end of a difficult week for the coalition government, should have been a "stroll in the park" and that there were questions whether the Labour leadership could connect with its core supporters.

Mr Galloway, expelled by Labour in 2003, won the by-election by 10,140 votes, in the process of overturning a Labour majority of more than 5,000 at the 2010 general election.

'Tidal wave'

He told the BBC that his win represented a "peaceful democratic uprising" against the established political parties and their leaders.

Analysis

George Galloway was carried out of the sports centre where the votes had been counted, on the shoulders of his supporters.

"Galloway! Galloway!" they screamed jubilantly.

A small convoy of cars, covered in Respect posters and flags, then completed a celebratory lap around an otherwise deserted football field, at 3am.

Why did George Galloway win here?

Firstly, he appears to have galvanised some who feel ignored, even disenfranchised by the main political parties.

An element of that is due to a specific local issue, the regularly delayed renovation of the city centre.

For others, in a multi-ethnic constituency, the call for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan was appealing.

For others still, this was a mid-term by-election.

It wasn't about choosing the next government, but sending a powerful message, selecting a noisy, high profile advocate to represent them.

Handing George Galloway a 10,000 vote majority certainly does that.

"It was a bit of tidal wave and it was one waiting to break all over the country," he told Radio 4's World At One.

"There are very large numbers of people completely disenchanted and alienated from the political process and from the mainstream political parties...There is no difference between the Tories, the Lib Dems and New Labour, or at least not a sufficient difference for anyone to notice or care."

He said he had focused his campaign on tackling Bradford's economic problems, suggesting the city had "gone backwards" during Labour's years in government.

"There is a great deal of concern about mass unemployment, poverty, poor educational statistics, poor health and a general sense of abandonment in post-industrial cities like Bradford," he said.

Other parties have suggested Mr Galloway depended on support from Asian voters in the city, with many Muslim voters attracted to his opposition to the war in Iraq and his call for troops to withdraw from Afghanistan immediately.

Turnout in the by-election was just over 50%, compared with 64.9% in the general election.

Lib Dem MP David Ward, who represents neighbouring Bradford East, has claimed white voters in the constituency "washed their hands" of the campaign.

'Something big'

He told the BBC the by-election came down to a "straight fight" between Mr Galloway and his Labour opponent for votes in inner-city areas, which have a larger Asian population.

Graphic showing ethnic mix in Bradford West

But Mr Galloway said the 50% turnout in the ballot "belied that".

"We won in virtually every area," he said. "We got support from all kinds of people."

He rejected claims that he had focused his message on just one section of the community.

"It was Labour who put up an Asian candidate who campaigned that he was a Pakistani Muslim," he said. "I don't think that is a charge that can be laid at us."

Mr Galloway said Respect, which was formed in 2004 in opposition to the Iraq war, would be campaigning vigorously during the upcoming council and mayoral elections and suggested it was "the start of something big" for the party.

Labour, whose share of the vote fell by more than 20% as it was pushed into second place, have said the result was totally unexpected.

'Local factors'

Opposition leader Ed Miliband said it was "incredibly disappointing" and he would be visiting the constituency in the next couple of weeks.

Ed Miliband: "I'm going to talk to people in Bradford to find out why this result happened"

"Clearly there were local factors, but I also say only four out of 10 people voted for the three mainstream political parties," he said.

"We've got to understand the reasons why that happened in Bradford."

He added: "We need to be engaged and rooted in every community of this country. We need to show to people that our politics, that Labour politics, can make a difference to people's lives."

The party's deputy leader Harriet Harman said the result did not reflect a lack of confidence in Mr Miliband's leadership as the party had performed strongly in other by-elections and council elections over the past year.

The Conservatives, who came third in the by-election with 2,746 votes, also saw their vote fall by more than 20%.

The party's co-chair, Baroness Warsi, said governments tended not to win by-elections and the result was more damaging for Labour.

"If Labour can't win one of their safe seats in these tough economic times and in a tough week for the government, how can they win anywhere?

"Not in half a century has an Opposition come back from such an appalling result to win a majority at the next general election.

"This tells you everything you need to know about Ed Miliband's weak leadership."

The Lib Dems came fourth and lost their deposit.

Thursday by-election was triggered by the resignation of former Labour MP Marsha Singh, who resigned on health grounds.

Labour had held the West Yorkshire seat since 1974, except for a brief period in the 1980s when the sitting MP defected to the SDP.

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 97.

    First the petrol crisis and now this. How many more April Fools to come?.....and who are the fools?

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 96.

    The three main parties are certainly flawed. But surely this country can come up with a better alternative than George Galloway?!

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 95.

    You can't tell much for a bi-election the BBC seems to have reached the conclusion that this was a worse result for Labour (Down 20% on the General Election) than Conservative (Down 23% on the General Election) For reasons best know to yourselves.

    What it actually indicates is that Galloway is a shrewd political operator
    That Tories are now 10% behind Labour in opinion polls is more significant

  • rate this
    +5

    Comment number 94.

    I left the UK 5 years ago. There is no party for the working class or the middle class. There is no party that is against all the wars. As much as I loath George as a person I'd rather have him than those repitillian slime balls who are the so called leaders of the 3 main parties.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 93.

    Looking forward to another Paxman vs Galloway!

  • rate this
    +8

    Comment number 92.

    Mr Galloway may be a maverick, but what he speaks is what he believes in. Watched his "interigation" by the US Senate Committee a while ago. Took them to the cleaners. Some Lawyer/Polititions were out of their depth. Whatever the guy is, he needs to be part of UK Democracy, just because he has the b*lls & knowledge to challenge the Con/Lib/Lab drones we have. He is an educated version of Skinner.

  • rate this
    +10

    Comment number 91.

    Of course it is understandable that the people of Bradford wanted to give the main parties a bloody nose, and they have in a big way. However, the result will not make an iota of difference to government (or what passes for Opposition) policy. Remember Martin Bell - elected on a tsunami of disgust at cash for questions and sleeze generally? Could he do anything to influence policy - not a bit.

  • Comment number 90.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 89.

    Now will Ed Miliband realise that no-one likes him. He can spin and change his voice as much as he wants, he is irreparably damaged as a serious PM. He is Labour's Ian Duncan Smith. They voted the wrong brother in. I would add that I am about a staunch a Labour supporter as you can get. If you can't convince me, who are you going to convince?

  • Comment number 88.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +15

    Comment number 87.

    Oh no I thought we had seen the last of this chap.
    Expect more muck stirring on a grand scale as his ego self promotes whilst he lines his pockets.

  • rate this
    +7

    Comment number 86.

    "Ed Miliband: "I'm going to talk to people in Bradford to find out why this result happened""

    Bless him, he's just not getting it is he.

  • rate this
    +24

    Comment number 85.

    Margaret Howard #49 says The 'Allies' (read Americans) killed more people "liberating" Iraq than Saddam managed. I don't think so. Adding up Saddam's victims - 1million Iranian conscripts in Iran-Iraq war, 250000 in Kurdish genocide, 100000 in Shia uprising in 1991. Allies messed up in Iraq but did not kill nearly two million people.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 84.

    Were any Black Swans spotted in Bradford?

  • rate this
    +9

    Comment number 83.

    So three Southern born MPs representing Northern constituencies failed to convince the voters that they are "working class" by buying hot sausage rolls from Greggs.

    Who would have thought it?

  • rate this
    +2

    Comment number 82.

    Nice to see someone who will tell the truth in amongst the war criminals.
    I don't see this as a seismic event 'cos no other Respect candidate will get elected. The mainstream parties and the gutter press use race / creed as a tactic all the time, don't bleat when people you don't like do it too. I hope he is not attacked by EDL supporters.

  • rate this
    +4

    Comment number 81.

    @aphoristic The Lib/Lab/Con'sters are indeed all complicit in the quest for a New World Order, which will ultimately mean the transformation of the United Kingdom into a powerless, EU state, stripped of sovereignty and constitution. But be careful what you wish for. Galloway is ultra pro-Islamic, just like Ken Livingstone (he who would make London a beacon of Islam, if he is elected its Mayor).

  • Comment number 80.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 79.

    He'll probably be a tiger in the next CBB.

  • rate this
    +3

    Comment number 78.

    This proves that the UK has finally woken up and realized the three big parties suck and we need a solution that put the power in the hands of the people.
    The solution can be found with the newly formed political party "iXDemocracy" i.e.
    "Create, elect and control your politicians
    It is the mission of iXDemocracy to have every politician and councillor controlled 100% by the electorate. "

 

Page 29 of 33

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.