David Cameron publishes list of all donors dining at No 10


David Cameron said funding reform was needed

Related Stories

David Cameron has given details of all Conservative donors who have had dinner with him in his Downing Street flat.

The prime minister said there had been four occasions in which he had invited Conservative supporters to No 10 - most of whom he had known for "many years".

Details of all meals between Conservative donors and ministers will now be published on a quarterly basis.

The PM has promised a thorough inquiry into fundraising after the resignation of Tory co-treasurer Peter Cruddas.

Mr Cruddas quit after reporters filmed him saying Tory party donors could gain influence at No 10's policy committee and could attend dinners in Mr Cameron's personal flat, above No 11 Downing Street.

The prime minister said the Conservative Party had "robust and sensible" procedures for handling donations but what Mr Cruddas had said was wrong - and that an inquiry would be conducted by Conservative peer and lawyer Lord Gold.

Dinner details

Mr Cameron's announcement that No 10 would release details of private dinners he had had with donors at No 10 came after apparent reluctance to do so and amid growing political pressure.

In a short statement ahead of a speech in London, the prime minister said he had three such dinners in his flat with "significant donors" between February 2011 and February 2012.

Those attending, No 10 has announced, were former Tory treasurer Michael Spencer with his partner, businessman David Rowland - who has given more than £4m to the party since 2009 - and his wife, plus oil executive Ian Taylor and his wife and banker Henry Angest and his wife.

Start Quote

Could it be that Rupert Murdoch wishes to see the man who set up the Leveson Inquiry go through the same agonisingly painful scrutiny as he has?”

End Quote

On a fourth occasion, the PM added, donors were present at a post-election celebration in Downing Street in July 2010.

Among those present were Conservative Party chief executive Andrew Feldman, party donors Lord Sainsbury and Michael Farmer and Murdoch Maclennan, chief executive of the firm which publishes the Daily Telegraph.

"None of these dinners were fundraising dinners or were paid for by the taxpayer," Mr Cameron insisted. "I have known most of those attending for many years."

In future, Mr Cameron said the Conservatives would publish details of all meals with donors, whether at No 10 or Chequers, as well as a register of all meetings with those who have given money.

But he insisted that Mr Cruddas had not instigated any meetings nor had donors influenced any government policy - although he said new safeguards would be introduced in future to ensure this could not happen.

"Let me make clear. No-one in the No 10 policy unit has met anyone at Peter Cruddas' request."

The BBC News Channel's Chief Political correspondent Norman Smith said No 10 was trying to "douse down" the controversy over donations and access to ministers but the opposition were likely to continued to press for an independent inquiry.

Funding offer

Mr Cameron also said there was an "urgent" need for reform of party political funding and he made an offer to other parties to introduce a £50,000 cap on political donations.

Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude has made a statement to Parliament about the affair and the prospect of restarting currently stalled cross-party talks on the future of political funding.

Deputy PM Nick Clegg, in South Korea, said he wanted to see cross-party talks on reform of party political funding to start this week so "we can fix this and fix it for good".

Labour are demanding answers over Mr Cruddas's claims, which were filmed by undercover Sunday Times reporters, came to light over the weekend. The matter has also been reported to the Metropolitan Police.


  • £382,451 - Peter Cruddas
  • £150,000 - Mark Bamford
  • £150,000 - Jean Parmer
  • £111,000 - Mary Cross
  • £109,200 - Edwin Healey
  • £100,000 - Nicholas Jenkins
  • £100,000 - Alexander Knaster

Source: Electoral Commission

Their leader Ed Miliband - who said Mr Cameron's failure to deliver the Commons statement suggested "he had something to hide" - said the matter could not be "swept under the carpet".

"We need to know what access was paid for, if access was paid for, and what contributions were made and the interaction between the prime minister, the chancellor and Conservative Party donors."

Conservative MP Mark Field said he was pleased the prime minister was "getting on the front foot" but called for a "more comprehensive list" to be released of all people David Cameron meets at No 10.

Mr Cruddas was secretly filmed saying that a donation of £200,000 or £250,000 gave "premier league" access to party leaders, including private dinners with Mr Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne. He also suggested that any such donor could have their feedback on political plans fed back to the party's policy committee.

He was heard initially saying that it was not possible to buy access to the prime minister.

But he then went on to discuss what access different size donations would get.


  • £1,999,967 - David Rowland
  • £553,000 - Michael Farmer
  • £500,000 - Jonathan Wood
  • £335,000 - Michael Bishop
  • £300,000 - May Makhzoumi
  • £250,000 - Paul Beecroft
  • £250,000 - Mark Bamford
  • £250,000 - Chris Rokos
  • £250,000 - Lord Sainsbury

Source: Electoral Commission

He was speaking to the reporters posing as staff from a fake wealth fund based in Liechtenstein who were interested in doing business in the UK.

He told them: "Two hundred grand to 250 is premier league… what you would get is, when we talk about your donations the first thing we want to do is get you at the Cameron/Osborne dinners."

He said they would be able to ask Mr Cameron "practically any question you want" and their views would be relayed to the No 10 policy committee.

In his resignation statement, Mr Cruddas said he regretted "any impression of impropriety" and there was "no question of donors being able to influence policy or gain undue access to politicians".

The Conservative Party currently has several levels of donation, with the top one being the Leader's Group, where for an annual donation of £50,000 donors can be invited to join Mr Cameron and other senior figures from the Conservative Party at dinners, post-Prime Minister's Questions lunches, drinks receptions, election result events and important campaign launches.

The Lib Dems have said "reform" of party funding was necessary and cross party talks were already due to start within the next few weeks.

The chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Sir Christopher Kelly, said who politicians "met and ate" with was not the main issue but whether party leaders and officials could continue to "solicit funds in this way".

Graph showing main party donors

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 767.

    No10 is a Government building and if he's dining with people because he's PM,and Leader of the Party in Government then it's public interest. The 'private flat' thing was disingenuous, and he must have known he'd never get away with it. What worries me more is that the Chancellor of the Exchequer is apparently involved too. Who's he been dining with? And what exactly is this Policy Group?

  • rate this

    Comment number 766.

    I’ve heard nothing of a police investigation. It cannot be that no crime has been committed?

  • rate this

    Comment number 765.

    Full independent inquiry.

    No whitewash.

    Nothing less will do.

    If you are clean, there is nothing to fear, right?

  • rate this

    Comment number 764.

    No such thing as a free lunch; I occasionally dine with Ronald McDonald and I've always had to pay for the privilege.
    So you've paid 99p to be slowly poisoned by a clown. But you cannot see the difference between 99p for that, and £250k for the privilege of the PM's ear? Nor can you see which is more damaging to the countries health.

  • rate this

    Comment number 763.

    A lot of ranting about what Unions do I see. None of them seem to realise that they were largely responsible for Britain's industrial decline through unrealistic and inflationary wage demands, counterproductive strike action, work-to-rules, closed-shop agreements and petty demarcation disputes. All the while using Members' funds to prop up the Labour party.

  • rate this

    Comment number 762.

    ummmmmm THE TIMES AYE!...anyone made the Murdoch link here?...("anything you can do I do better!")

    As for DEMOCRACY(so called) we may have one person one vote but what was that saying?....ahh yes..."POLITICIANS ARE THERE TO GIVE US THE ILLUSION OF CHOICE!"

  • rate this

    Comment number 761.

    The PM is entitled to a personal life but in his position he has to be - and be seen to be - beyond reproach.

    There has long been suspicion that our politicians are cosying up to big business, at the expense of the people of this country. I have no problem with people donating to parties but that should be on the basis of their approval of their policies, not to influence our leaders.

  • rate this

    Comment number 760.

    The concept of entering public service because you want to improve the country and the lot of the citizens appears to have gone out of favour...

    Think I'll run in the next election, being old-fashioned enough to believe in public service directed to the betterment of nation and citizens - anyone want to vote for me?

  • rate this

    Comment number 759.

    "Labours constituion includes trades union representation and voting power."

    You ought to change 'representation' to 'ownership' - didn't the party want David M but they got Ed foisted on them? Got to keep the donors happy I guess.
    They're all as bad as each other, don't let anyone tell you different.

  • rate this

    Comment number 758.

    Who appointed Mr Cruddas? Did they really have no idea what sort of a man he is?

    Given what sort of a man he is, his expense claims going back several years should be subjected to intense scrutiny.

    Any other members of the Tory party in the room during the meeting should be 'outed' They are complicit in corruption by virtue of their silence in the face of such blatant wrong doing.

    Times up guys

  • rate this

    Comment number 757.

    Most governments take a while for that rotten smell to settle in this one smelt bad before it even stepped into No 10! The only reason they are publishing the list is because they got caught with their hand in the till.

  • rate this

    Comment number 756.

    Yeah... nice try Dave.

    I saw the headlines in the early hours of this morning saying you had refused to give information on your dinner guests.

    This sudden u-turn is making you look sloppy and indecisive. (Not that we didn't already know that)

    What a sleazy way to carry on.

  • rate this

    Comment number 755.

    This is just plain wrong, not only should there be a fraud investigation of crud there should be a public inquiry and I dont mean by a tory lawyer this should call into question every decision by this government that benefits those in the public sector including the NHS bill....come to that does anyone trust this government? We should be given a chance to vote confidence or no confidence in them

  • rate this

    Comment number 754.

    How about:

    All parties funded out of capped subscriptions.

    Say a max. of £20pa. Plus a candidate can put forward a max of £10k personally towards election costs.

    Every party then has, paid for by the state, a minimum amount of television time plus a weighted amount, depending upon how many candidates they are fielding.

    That's it. No more. Cut the funding just stand by your policies.

  • rate this

    Comment number 753.

    We are about to enter some very difficult times in world economics and security. Where are the politicians of any party we can trust to steer us through them? Its all a game to them isnt it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 752.

    The Brits (that list was not exhaustive) have been accepting government (PS it isn't 'rule') from a self serving elite for far too long. The con has been on for so long that we are born into it and grow up with it as the 'norm'. Some changes post WW2, but not sufficient. Trouble is, 'they' control the the armed forces. Shame.

  • rate this

    Comment number 751.

    Makes me sick to the core.

  • rate this

    Comment number 750.

    734 stezzwez

    "Has anyone got any spare tickets for Hull City's game this week - might give Eddie baby a ring"

    You'll need a hundred grand and a Rolls Royce too.

  • rate this

    Comment number 749.

    ""Let me make clear. No-one in the No 10 policy unit has met anyone at Peter Cruddas' request.""

    The trouble is, Dave, on your track record to date, I don't trust you.

  • rate this

    Comment number 748.

    All parties run on donations. Fact. Now can we have some real news please?


Page 12 of 50


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.