David Cameron publishes list of all donors dining at No 10


David Cameron said funding reform was needed

Related Stories

David Cameron has given details of all Conservative donors who have had dinner with him in his Downing Street flat.

The prime minister said there had been four occasions in which he had invited Conservative supporters to No 10 - most of whom he had known for "many years".

Details of all meals between Conservative donors and ministers will now be published on a quarterly basis.

The PM has promised a thorough inquiry into fundraising after the resignation of Tory co-treasurer Peter Cruddas.

Mr Cruddas quit after reporters filmed him saying Tory party donors could gain influence at No 10's policy committee and could attend dinners in Mr Cameron's personal flat, above No 11 Downing Street.

The prime minister said the Conservative Party had "robust and sensible" procedures for handling donations but what Mr Cruddas had said was wrong - and that an inquiry would be conducted by Conservative peer and lawyer Lord Gold.

Dinner details

Mr Cameron's announcement that No 10 would release details of private dinners he had had with donors at No 10 came after apparent reluctance to do so and amid growing political pressure.

In a short statement ahead of a speech in London, the prime minister said he had three such dinners in his flat with "significant donors" between February 2011 and February 2012.

Those attending, No 10 has announced, were former Tory treasurer Michael Spencer with his partner, businessman David Rowland - who has given more than £4m to the party since 2009 - and his wife, plus oil executive Ian Taylor and his wife and banker Henry Angest and his wife.

Start Quote

Could it be that Rupert Murdoch wishes to see the man who set up the Leveson Inquiry go through the same agonisingly painful scrutiny as he has?”

End Quote

On a fourth occasion, the PM added, donors were present at a post-election celebration in Downing Street in July 2010.

Among those present were Conservative Party chief executive Andrew Feldman, party donors Lord Sainsbury and Michael Farmer and Murdoch Maclennan, chief executive of the firm which publishes the Daily Telegraph.

"None of these dinners were fundraising dinners or were paid for by the taxpayer," Mr Cameron insisted. "I have known most of those attending for many years."

In future, Mr Cameron said the Conservatives would publish details of all meals with donors, whether at No 10 or Chequers, as well as a register of all meetings with those who have given money.

But he insisted that Mr Cruddas had not instigated any meetings nor had donors influenced any government policy - although he said new safeguards would be introduced in future to ensure this could not happen.

"Let me make clear. No-one in the No 10 policy unit has met anyone at Peter Cruddas' request."

The BBC News Channel's Chief Political correspondent Norman Smith said No 10 was trying to "douse down" the controversy over donations and access to ministers but the opposition were likely to continued to press for an independent inquiry.

Funding offer

Mr Cameron also said there was an "urgent" need for reform of party political funding and he made an offer to other parties to introduce a £50,000 cap on political donations.

Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude has made a statement to Parliament about the affair and the prospect of restarting currently stalled cross-party talks on the future of political funding.

Deputy PM Nick Clegg, in South Korea, said he wanted to see cross-party talks on reform of party political funding to start this week so "we can fix this and fix it for good".

Labour are demanding answers over Mr Cruddas's claims, which were filmed by undercover Sunday Times reporters, came to light over the weekend. The matter has also been reported to the Metropolitan Police.


  • £382,451 - Peter Cruddas
  • £150,000 - Mark Bamford
  • £150,000 - Jean Parmer
  • £111,000 - Mary Cross
  • £109,200 - Edwin Healey
  • £100,000 - Nicholas Jenkins
  • £100,000 - Alexander Knaster

Source: Electoral Commission

Their leader Ed Miliband - who said Mr Cameron's failure to deliver the Commons statement suggested "he had something to hide" - said the matter could not be "swept under the carpet".

"We need to know what access was paid for, if access was paid for, and what contributions were made and the interaction between the prime minister, the chancellor and Conservative Party donors."

Conservative MP Mark Field said he was pleased the prime minister was "getting on the front foot" but called for a "more comprehensive list" to be released of all people David Cameron meets at No 10.

Mr Cruddas was secretly filmed saying that a donation of £200,000 or £250,000 gave "premier league" access to party leaders, including private dinners with Mr Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne. He also suggested that any such donor could have their feedback on political plans fed back to the party's policy committee.

He was heard initially saying that it was not possible to buy access to the prime minister.

But he then went on to discuss what access different size donations would get.


  • £1,999,967 - David Rowland
  • £553,000 - Michael Farmer
  • £500,000 - Jonathan Wood
  • £335,000 - Michael Bishop
  • £300,000 - May Makhzoumi
  • £250,000 - Paul Beecroft
  • £250,000 - Mark Bamford
  • £250,000 - Chris Rokos
  • £250,000 - Lord Sainsbury

Source: Electoral Commission

He was speaking to the reporters posing as staff from a fake wealth fund based in Liechtenstein who were interested in doing business in the UK.

He told them: "Two hundred grand to 250 is premier league… what you would get is, when we talk about your donations the first thing we want to do is get you at the Cameron/Osborne dinners."

He said they would be able to ask Mr Cameron "practically any question you want" and their views would be relayed to the No 10 policy committee.

In his resignation statement, Mr Cruddas said he regretted "any impression of impropriety" and there was "no question of donors being able to influence policy or gain undue access to politicians".

The Conservative Party currently has several levels of donation, with the top one being the Leader's Group, where for an annual donation of £50,000 donors can be invited to join Mr Cameron and other senior figures from the Conservative Party at dinners, post-Prime Minister's Questions lunches, drinks receptions, election result events and important campaign launches.

The Lib Dems have said "reform" of party funding was necessary and cross party talks were already due to start within the next few weeks.

The chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Sir Christopher Kelly, said who politicians "met and ate" with was not the main issue but whether party leaders and officials could continue to "solicit funds in this way".

Graph showing main party donors

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 87.

    Cameron appears to fail to grasp that their is a difference between a Large Donation from a Trade Union consisting of hundreds of thousands of UK members (about £ 3 each) who have the choice of paying the political Levy or not to the Party formed by the Trade Union Movement and anonymous donations from a Company registered in Lichtenstein!

    That's because His is the World of the Rich is right!

  • Comment number 86.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 85.

    cameron claims the whole affair is unacceptable and investigations will be held. Can he clarify whether he was refferring to cash for questions or getting caught accepting cash for questions? What is amazing is that these people really can't see why there is so much voter apathy and people don't trust politicians in general.

  • Comment number 84.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this

    Comment number 83.

    I bet he's lost his appetite.

  • rate this

    Comment number 82.

    I see the hired cheerleaders are in full force on the HYS discussion once again. This is how tax money is spent, with hired PR firms commenting and voting up/down comments on sites like this. Just watch as the working day ends and they get tired, you'll see the numbers change. It's so transparent it's funny!

  • rate this

    Comment number 81.

    What the Camerons have for supper and who they invite to their private flat is really none of our business. This is so silly. They are human like the rest of us and their privacy should be respected.

  • rate this

    Comment number 80.

    Was the 50p Tax Rate cut for the sake of the economy, or because a private donor requested it?

  • rate this

    Comment number 79.

    Hmmm.... I wondered where the idea for the cut in the top rate of tax at last week's budget came from? If you earned enough, it would make financial sense to donate to the Tory party in return for fiscal favours.

  • rate this

    Comment number 78.

    Dear Mr Prime Minister:-

    Please reconsider your decision. Your failure to be transparent has further damaged your office and your reputation. No.10 is only your temporary home. As a visitor you are required to keep it, at tax payers' expense, it excellent condition. Its use, however, should be subject to scrutiny and answerable to the electorate. The same applies to Chequers.

    Regards, Jeggy

  • rate this

    Comment number 77.

    It's amazing that a party that claims to be the defender of the Union can do so much to destroy it

    The Conservative party are not fit to run the UK as a whole and the end game of there time in office will be overseeing the break up on the United Kingdom.

    We need a Government that stands up for the UK as a whole, not just the business elite and there own vested interests.

  • rate this

    Comment number 76.

    If the "guest" has made a donation then he should declare if he attends dinner or what access he has to the prime minister in whatever form. The prime minister and his government have access to spend tax payers money and we want it to be clear and seen to be clear that government policy is not influenced at private dinners with donors.

  • rate this

    Comment number 75.

    It appears that you must be devoid of any moral or ethical standards in order to be a politician and run this country.

    What is Cameron hiding? Will those donors be getting nice, juicy contracts as the Coalition privatise everything?

  • rate this

    Comment number 74.

    There should be a law forcing politicians to disclose who they're meeting with. Unfortunately I don't have enough money to get it passed.

  • rate this

    Comment number 73.

    I didn't vote for this, did you?

    This government is a total disgrace.

  • rate this

    Comment number 72.

    Well,thats taken the wind out of the debate.The PM has just said he will publish all details of events held in the flat at No10 and elsewhere.He's also stated that a cap on all donations can be made as soon as tomorrow if Labour agree.Over to you Ed.

  • rate this

    Comment number 71.

    Without knowing the full details I would not really want to point the finger however everything is about perception and the perception of this Govt is simply like are the rest... they cannot be trusted.

    SHAME , I did have hope for them ...turn the light off on the way out..

  • rate this

    Comment number 70.

    Are we really to believe that these people make such payments because they merely want to enjoy David Cameron's company over dinner? He has no right to privacy on this issue, unless he can demonstrate these people are genuine friends.

  • rate this

    Comment number 69.


  • rate this

    Comment number 68.

    What about Labour leader not only having dinners with his financial backers but with his sponsors having a say in who is the leader in the first place?
    Read something about the history of this country and you with realise the vital role unions have played in winning the fundamental rights and freedoms we all now enjoy.
    They are an essential part of retaining our democracy.


Page 46 of 50


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.