Budget's two major announcements from the chancellor

George Osborne The Budget will be on BBC2, BBC News and online from 1130-1500

The Daily Politics understands Wednesday's Budget will be dominated by two major announcements.

1. The tax-free allowance before income tax clicks in will be increased more quickly than the coalition agreement currently envisages, reaching £10,000 in April 2014, a year earlier than planned.

2. The top rate of income tax will be cut from 50p to 45p, but not until April 2013.

The significance of the phasing of these two measures is that it leaves the chancellor's Budget deficit arithmetic largely untouched over the next two years. The tax-free band will increase this April and next in line with current announcements.

Start Quote

The chancellor wanted to go straight to 40p in return for a variation of the Mansion Tax and the Lib Dems were up for that, but the prime minister did not agree.”

End Quote Andrew Neil Presenter, Daily and Sunday Politics

Then it will increase twice as fast as currently envisaged in the 2014 Budget to take it to £10,000.

The Budget Red Book will show the fall in the top rate to 45p as revenue neutral (the Office for Budget Responsibility has signed off on this).

The 2011-12 deficit was projected to be £127bn in the November statement but now looks like it will come in lower than that.

Until recently it was thought it could be a lot lower but a late flurry of spending by departments and lower than expected tax receipts (partly because of lower bank bonuses) mean it might only be a few billions less.

The chancellor aims to bank whatever the shortfall and improve on it in 2012 and 2013 so he has the money to pay for the move to the £10,000 threshold in 2014. It will also be paid for out of various clamp downs on tax avoidance he will announce.

Electoral bribe

The move to a new 45p rate is an interim measure but there is no agreement on when it would go to 40p.

The chancellor wanted to go straight to 40p in return for a variation of the mansion tax and the Lib Dems were up for that. But the prime minister did not agree.

The chancellor would still like to go to 40p in 2014 when the first £10,000 of income becomes tax free. But the Lib Dems are insisting on some other tax on the rich as a quid pro quo.

The agreement to move to a £10,000 threshold in 2014 rather than 2015 (as the coalition agreement currently envisages) was seen by both sides as good politics: to get the money into people's pockets a year before the election was seen as better than a tax cut only a month before the next election, when it could easily be dismissed as an electoral bribe.

Andrew Neil, Presenter, The Daily Politics and Sunday Politics Article written by Andrew Neil Andrew Neil Daily and Sunday Politics

Responding to Davey interview critics localisation->translate("watch"); ?>

Andrew Neil's response to criticism in a Guardian Blog and on Twitter to his Sunday Politics interview with Ed Davey.

Watch Andrew's report


Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 1.

    Yes, drop the tax on the rich because they can avoid paying anyway with tax avoidance and illegal methods, so this way they'll just happily fall in line. It's obvious, isn't it? And anyway, £400 million is chump change, the government blows that on a daily basis. While you little people can wait an extra year than the rich for your tax bone. Why would anyone be upset? Libcon thinking at its best.

  • rate this

    Comment number 2.

    It all rubbish but you can see where osborne priorities are the high pay get tax cut a year before low paid get any help DISGRACE but do you expect osborne been doing it since they came to power

  • rate this

    Comment number 3.

    Two years to wait before the £10K threshold comes in. No help whatsoever NOW is it? Well before then all prices will have risen well above this pittance of a tax reduction, you wont even notice you had it Pathetic!

  • rate this

    Comment number 4.

    There must surely also be an announcement on the amount of the tax free lump sum which can be received when a pension is commuted on retirement. Pensions have become too much of a tax avoidance scheme rather than give a reglar income on retirement. There must also me an announcement on the progress to integrating income tax and national insurance. Merge health and social care, formally.

  • rate this

    Comment number 5.

    Although I will not benefit from the proposed raising of the tax threshold, I am pleased that the workers at last are receiving some consideration.

    It is sad that some comments are from entrenched positions,full of vitriolic envy.There is still financial dishonesty,greed and inequity, but some seem to think that if the rich were divested of all their cash, all would be well.I don't believe it.


Comments 5 of 7


This entry is now closed for comments


BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.