London 2012 Olympics - if not strikes, then protests?

 

Mirror, mirror on the wall - who's the strongest of them all?

Re-read the whole of the Guardian's excellent interview with Unite's Len McCluskey and that's the question you sense he's asking.

The headlines understandably focussed on his musings about strikes during the Olympics.

The interview as a whole, though, reflects not the strength of the leader of Britain's biggest union but his angsting about his relative weakness.

It combined familiar frustration with the legal constraints on unions, with admiration for protest movements like UK Uncut, Right to Work and Occupy.

"Direct action is a fantastic thing. It is becoming the hallmark of this world that we are living in, people coming out and taking direct action.

"Look at UK Uncut... I'm amazed and delighted at the type of action we've seen from the students.

"We've got all these companies not paying taxes, and UK Uncut - a bunch of young people - said this is ridiculous, we are going to go and protest.

"Now they have a network where they can bring it about at the snap of a finger."

Unite has already linked up with UK Uncut and Right to Work. Perhaps we were all focusing on the wrong question yesterday.

McCluskey may have been musing less about strikes during the Olympics - no doubt the bus drivers he represents will, as the tube and train drivers have done, manage to secure some sort of Olympic "bonus" - and more about protests.

"People have to understand that we are fighting for our heritage here. Our parents and our grandparents, having defeated fascism in Europe, came back determined to build a land fit for heroes.

"They gave us the welfare state, the National Health Service, universal education. All of that is being attacked.

"I, for one, am not prepared to stand by and have my children or grandchildren say to me: 'What did you do when this was being taken away from us?' When you say 'what can we do?' and (ask me about)... the likes of the Olympics, I'm calling upon the general public to engage in civil disobedience... if there is a protest, then the purpose of protest is to bring your grievances to the attention of as many people as possible".

Ed Miliband was swift to condemn McCluskey's call for strikes during the Olympics yesterday. So too were MPs close to Unite.

How will they react if Unite joins forces with protest movements to disrupt the Olympics or, at least, to ensure that visitors to the UK this summer do not simply come away with memories of sport, the Union Jack and red buses?

PS. There was an interesting discussion on this very subject on the Today programme this morning with Labour MP John McDonnell and my old colleague and veteran union watcher Nicholas Jones.

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

What a difference a day makes

In just 24 hours, Sir Malcolm Rifkind went from angry defiance to a grim-faced acceptance that he would have to quit his job as an MP and chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee.

Read full article

More on This Story

More from Nick

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 193.

    Civil disobedience and protests are signs of an Industrial/military Dictatorship. Mirror Mirror on the wall who can provide the toughest private police army of them all in time for the Olympics?

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 192.

    Sons Of Albion - the countries in crisis, not enough tax take to pay for our welfare state. I know lets all go and distrupt a major international revenue earner because we're all pissed off. Childish or what ?

    LA 6.5 Million union members - thats about 10% of the electorate ? how many of the 6.5 million support messing up the olympics ?

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 191.

    BG@189
    To my parents generation he was still a terrorist - hard to change old values even against the weight of evidence.

    Nice to see C P Snow get a mention on Bragg tonight, CPS wrote - "When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion."

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 190.

    IDB 188
    Yes, if there is nothing to hide then it begs the question why all this procrastinating and appeal stuff. But then Gove is a belligerent character guarding us all from the rise of the 'Trots'.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 189.

    #186 S
    Against my own advice!
    'campaigns'? A campaign of violence is acceptable if no alternative exists to achieve freedom. Innocent casualties are regrettable, not always avoidable. ('freedom' & 'innocent' need defining). I believe Mandela eschewed violence in his 'early' political years but later agreed to the use of 'targeted' violence when it became clear that it was the only option left.

 

Comments 5 of 193

 

Features

  • Mukesh SinghNo remorse

    Delhi bus rapist says victim shouldn't have fought back


  • Aimen DeanI spied

    The founder member of al-Qaeda who worked for MI6


  • Before and after shotsPerfect body

    Just how reliable are 'before and after' photos?


  • A man shutting his eyes tightlyStrange light show

    What do you see when you close your eyes?


  • Sony WalkmanLost ideas

    What has happened to Japan's inventors?


Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.