New disability tests 'must prove fair and accurate'


Dame Anne Begg: "Government must tread carefully" over planned changes

Related Stories

The government must ensure new welfare assessments planned for disabled people are "accurate and fair" before they are rolled out nationally, MPs have said.

The Work and Pensions Select Committee said the tests for the new Personal Independence Payment, coming in from 2013, could cut funds people relied on.

The assessments risk being too narrow and missing wider factors, the MPs say.

The government says "a new face-to-face assessment and regular reviews" will ensure "the right levels of support".

The committee said there were "high levels of anxiety" among claimants of Disability Living Allowance (DLA), about its replacement with the new PIP benefit for those of working age.

While the Treasury had projected 20% savings from PIP, it remained unclear who would lose out, the committee said.

The MPs fear the assessment for PIP could focus too narrowly on medical definitions, ignoring environmental factors such as a disabled person's access to public transport.

Start Quote

Under the current system there are hundreds of millions of pounds of overpayments and underpayments”

End Quote Spokeswoman Department for Work and Pensions

"The government needs to be certain that the new assessment procedure is accurate and fair before it is introduced," said chairwoman Dame Anne Begg.

"Otherwise, there is a risk that people with serious disabilities and health conditions will lose the money they rely on to meet the additional costs incurred as a result of their disability - costs such as maintaining wheelchairs, using specially adapted cars, or paying for help to ensure they can live independently."

The committee wants a national roll-out of the assessments only after a limited regional trial had proved successful.

A Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: "Under the current system there are hundreds of millions of pounds of overpayments and underpayments and 70% of people get the benefit for life without systematic checks to see if their condition has changed.

"We are replacing DLA with Personal Independence Payment and introducing a new face-to-face assessment and regular reviews to make sure people are getting the right levels of support."

'No guarantee'

She added that discussions with disabled people and organisations had already resulted in "significant changes ... improving the assessment and making it fairer".

PIP is contained in the controversial Welfare Reform Bill, which has suffered repeated defeats in the House of Lords.

Wheelchair user's hand Disability Living Allowance is paid to 3.2 million people

Disability campaigners welcomed the MPs' report.

Richard Hawkes, chief executive of disability charity Scope, said: "The government wants to create a more targeted payment. But if it goes ahead with the proposed assessment there is no guarantee that support will go to the people that need it."

Simon Shaw, of deafblind charity Sense, urged the government "to change the way it assesses people while there is still time".

"Blind, partially sighted and other disabled people must not find themselves forced to go through lengthy, costly and stressful appeals processes to get a fair outcome," said Steve Winyard, head of policy and campaigns at RNIB.


More on This Story

Related Stories


This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
  • rate this

    Comment number 276.

    The benefits system has to be both fair and be seen to be fair, both to those claiming and to the taxpayer who funds them. Simplifying benefits goes some way to helping see through the fog. To be seen to be weeding out the cheats gives more credibility to those in genuine need.

  • rate this

    Comment number 273.

    I would be concerned that these new rules may not take into account the less easily definable effects (in medical terms) of mental health problems such as bipolar disorder, e.g. social functioning issues.

  • rate this

    Comment number 269.

    Simplification of the benefits system. Great. But hang on, personal situations don't fit in nice neat boxes and disabilities certainly don't. So realistically can it ever be *both* fair and simple?

    Get real, this is all about money, nothing else.

  • rate this

    Comment number 265.

    This is simply the rationing of benefit by another name. As a society we should ensure that ALL those who require the help and assistance provided through DLA receive it and those that do not require the benefit do not receive it. Paying a private company to carry out tick box exercises with the sole aim of reducing the amount of benefit paid is immoral.

  • rate this

    Comment number 256.

    I can't see why anyone genuinely unable to work should mind proving it. Those that do object maybe gave good reason.


More Politics stories



BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.