New disability tests 'must prove fair and accurate'
Dame Anne Begg: "Government must tread carefully" over planned changes
The government must ensure new welfare assessments planned for disabled people are "accurate and fair" before they are rolled out nationally, MPs have said.
The Work and Pensions Select Committee said the tests for the new Personal Independence Payment, coming in from 2013, could cut funds people relied on.
The assessments risk being too narrow and missing wider factors, the MPs say.
The government says "a new face-to-face assessment and regular reviews" will ensure "the right levels of support".
The committee said there were "high levels of anxiety" among claimants of Disability Living Allowance (DLA), about its replacement with the new PIP benefit for those of working age.
While the Treasury had projected 20% savings from PIP, it remained unclear who would lose out, the committee said.
The MPs fear the assessment for PIP could focus too narrowly on medical definitions, ignoring environmental factors such as a disabled person's access to public transport.
“Start Quote
End Quote Spokeswoman Department for Work and PensionsUnder the current system there are hundreds of millions of pounds of overpayments and underpayments”
"The government needs to be certain that the new assessment procedure is accurate and fair before it is introduced," said chairwoman Dame Anne Begg.
"Otherwise, there is a risk that people with serious disabilities and health conditions will lose the money they rely on to meet the additional costs incurred as a result of their disability - costs such as maintaining wheelchairs, using specially adapted cars, or paying for help to ensure they can live independently."
The committee wants a national roll-out of the assessments only after a limited regional trial had proved successful.
A Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: "Under the current system there are hundreds of millions of pounds of overpayments and underpayments and 70% of people get the benefit for life without systematic checks to see if their condition has changed.
"We are replacing DLA with Personal Independence Payment and introducing a new face-to-face assessment and regular reviews to make sure people are getting the right levels of support."
'No guarantee'She added that discussions with disabled people and organisations had already resulted in "significant changes ... improving the assessment and making it fairer".
PIP is contained in the controversial Welfare Reform Bill, which has suffered repeated defeats in the House of Lords.
Disability Living Allowance is paid to 3.2 million people
Disability campaigners welcomed the MPs' report.
Richard Hawkes, chief executive of disability charity Scope, said: "The government wants to create a more targeted payment. But if it goes ahead with the proposed assessment there is no guarantee that support will go to the people that need it."
Simon Shaw, of deafblind charity Sense, urged the government "to change the way it assesses people while there is still time".
"Blind, partially sighted and other disabled people must not find themselves forced to go through lengthy, costly and stressful appeals processes to get a fair outcome," said Steve Winyard, head of policy and campaigns at RNIB.
~RS~q~RS~~RS~z~RS~59~RS~)


Don't derail gay marriage - Clegg
Dozens die in Iraqi car bomb attacks
Foot loose
Afrikaner agony
America's Latino future
Hoops and dreams
Be kind, rewind
HARDtalk
Comment number 276.
LUFCAT19th February 2012 - 21:03
The benefits system has to be both fair and be seen to be fair, both to those claiming and to the taxpayer who funds them. Simplifying benefits goes some way to helping see through the fog. To be seen to be weeding out the cheats gives more credibility to those in genuine need.
Link to this (Comment number 276)
Comment number 273.
Jo B19th February 2012 - 20:50
I would be concerned that these new rules may not take into account the less easily definable effects (in medical terms) of mental health problems such as bipolar disorder, e.g. social functioning issues.
Link to this (Comment number 273)
Comment number 269.
speed_of_dark19th February 2012 - 20:52
Simplification of the benefits system. Great. But hang on, personal situations don't fit in nice neat boxes and disabilities certainly don't. So realistically can it ever be *both* fair and simple?
Get real, this is all about money, nothing else.
Link to this (Comment number 269)
Comment number 265.
skywatcher19th February 2012 - 20:36
This is simply the rationing of benefit by another name. As a society we should ensure that ALL those who require the help and assistance provided through DLA receive it and those that do not require the benefit do not receive it. Paying a private company to carry out tick box exercises with the sole aim of reducing the amount of benefit paid is immoral.
Link to this (Comment number 265)
Comment number 256.
LUFCAT19th February 2012 - 20:32
I can't see why anyone genuinely unable to work should mind proving it. Those that do object maybe gave good reason.
Link to this (Comment number 256)