Is night falling on Daylight Saving Bill?

 

Related Stories

The forces of darkness (pun intended) seem to be massing against Rebecca Harris's Daylight Saving Bill (see earlier posting).

Earlier this week I thought it might be able to clear the Commons; now I think its prospects depend on 100 MPs being prepared to force a vote. There are now 11 pages of amendments to be put at Friday's report stage, and, ominously, many of them bear the name of the arch-terminator of private members' bills, the Conservative Christopher Chope.

Then there's Jacob Rees-Mogg's proposal for an independent Somerset time zone, and Philip Davies' proposal to call it the "Berlin Time" Bill.

And I gather most SNP MPs will be around tomorrow to put their concerns about the implications for Scotland. The bill's best prospect of getting through the Commons and being sent on to the Lords would be if the chair allowed a closure motion - which is unlikely to happen much before 1pm.

That in turn threatens the widely-supported Live Music Bill - although it is possible to rush a bill through its remaining stages in remarkably little time, if no-one objects. And it seems to spell certain doom for Chris Chope's Local Government (Review of Decisions) Bill - although given that he's the one putting down amendments on Daylight Saving, I assume he's prepared to accept that as collateral damage. Perhaps the government has cooled over his modest proposal to provide a way of overturning such things as over-cautious health and safety rulings.

So watch out for a day of elaborate tactical games as this round of private members' bills draws to a close.

 
Mark D'Arcy, Parliamentary correspondent Article written by Mark D'Arcy Mark D'Arcy Parliamentary correspondent

Week ahead

The Commons returns from its summer break, with a week expected to begin with a number of major statements.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 16.

    The problem with this bill was that it intended originally to take note of the views of the regions and not to proceed if there was no consensus. In the last week it began to look as though the bills supporters and Mr Ed Davy(originally against) were preparing to ignore the regions,hence the parliamentary games that the Lighter Later people are now whining about.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 15.

    I agree that if people want longer evenings then they should just start work earlier.

    In this increasingly technical age we should resist moves that further alienate us from nature's cycles. Noon is understood, at a primeval level, as the time when the sun is highest in the sky (give or take a few minutes to allow for longitude). Moving to BST or double BST takes us away from that.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 14.

    Why should we change the time standard? Could we not just change the times we work, if we need to conform to CET? I always used to work 8-4 when I worked in an office - because it was much easier to get to and from work at those times, not for any need to conform to CET - and it would also serve to lower congestion by staggering the working day.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 13.

    Calling it "double summer time" is just a euphimism for Central European Time but they can't even be honest about it. It's spun in terms of energy saving and safety, nonsense!

    #6 is absolutely correct. Given the range of latitude the UK spans AND the fact that most of the country is to the west of the prime meridian the UK should really be on GMT all year round.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 12.

    I think they should put private members bills under the auspices of the backbench business committee, or move them to a 3 hour slot on a Wednesday evening, with a guaranteed vote at the end.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 11.

    Why are MPs wasting parliamentary time with this? Are there not many more important issues that need addressed?

    It was tried before and given up - try research Ms Harris!!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 10.

    There must be better things to waste time discussing. Whatever time zone we are in, we won't gain daylight hours.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 9.

    Will the last person to leave please turn out the lights, then at least all you mushrooms can continue to absorb that lovely manure you're being kept in, and continually fed on. Darkness suits those who feed you - while you pay them for doing it. They thrive, you and your's do not, you merely exist, at least for the moment.......to be continually deceived. What's an hour between fiends!

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 8.

    This argument has been conducted in an atmosphere of Old Colonial Tory Scot-Bashing, so when the measure finally fails because the Scottish Government will not back it, Scots will again be vilified in the English Press, and more anti-Scottish vitriol will be published. Alex Salmond must be happy at that prospect.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 7.

    it defo cant be scottish mean time as we would never live it down as we are already thought of as prudent[another word may be better] . :)

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 6.

    I hope this bill succeeds in raising the question of changing the clocks twice a year but does not succeed in moving the clocks forward an hour. This would place us on CET (Central European Time) when as a country we sit on the Greenwich Meridian and should be following correct timezone of GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) for the whole year without messing about with clocks for ancient reasons.

  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 5.

    the people of this country dont want our time zone being messed about with. just leave it alone!!!!!!
    i hope they throw rebecca and her bill in the bin where they both belong!

  • rate this
    -3

    Comment number 4.

    "it can be Scottish Mean Time (SMT) or perhaps Pictish Mean Time..."

    (PMT) ! Tis late took me a while to spot that one

  • Comment number 3.

    This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.

  • rate this
    +1

    Comment number 2.

    Mr Darcy, is there really no better way to stop a bill that one doesn't like than the frankly juvenile tactics of our MPs? I didn't believe you about Rees-Mog until I looked up the bill..

    Page 2, line 35 [Clause 4], at end insert ‘; except the County of Somerset as defined ...etc.

    And Politicians wonder why we have no respect. How about bringing this up in a TIP on Friday?

  • rate this
    -5

    Comment number 1.

    If Scotland vote for independence in the referendum, (whenever it happens), they can then have a time zone all to themselves if they want.

    It can be Scottish Mean Time (SMT) or perhaps Pictish Mean Time...

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.