Scotland: The key is the question

 

Related Stories

This week's battle of Britain began with an argument about the date of a referendum on Scottish independence. It is quickly turning into one about the question to be asked.

Senior government sources have told me that, despite the talk at the weekend of the need for a vote within 18 months, they can live with Alex Salmond's proposal for a vote in the autumn of 2014.

What they really care about is ensuring that there is only one question - a simple Yes/No to independence - and not a second vote on "devo max" or what some used to call "independence-lite".

They are delighted that Salmond felt the need to rush out a date and that he plumped for one before the next Westminster elections.

Their fear was that the Scottish Nationalists would play this long and at least until after the next Westminster elections in 2015 when there might be another Tory-led government.

They are determined that Salmond will not be allowed a "fall-back" option of greater powers for the Scottish Parliament if he loses a vote on independence.

This is part political calculation and part principle.

The new coalition for the Union of the three major UK parties argue that a fundamental change to the position of Scotland within the UK - for example, much greater tax and spending powers - would have implications not just for the Welsh and Northern Irish assemblies but all parts of the UK.

In other words, that option is not one for Scots alone to decide on.

It's all rather curious since the signs are that Labour and the Lib Dems are moving towards the idea of much greater powers for Holyrood.

It raises the possibility that Salmond may fight and lose an independence referendum but end up as first minister in a more powerful Scottish Parliament.

That is the view of Sir John Elvidge who was, until 2010, Salmond's top official - permanent secretary of the Scottish government - who was one of those who took part in the Decision Time programme I chaired on BBC Radio 4. You can listen again here.

 
Nick Robinson Article written by Nick Robinson Nick Robinson Political editor

Constitutional change: The debate starts here

Constitutional change used to be a marginal pastime but in the aftermath of Scotland's decision it is all important.

Read full article

More on This Story

Related Stories

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 481.

    @480 - I also believe both nations would prosper and would/should be close friends and good neighbours - possibly then some of the animosity that appears to exist would dissipate. I have yet to hear a single point being fully articulated to support the 'we are stronger together' argument being used by various parties.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 480.

    @479 -

    And we are so thankful that system has so many design faults.

    As much as the Scottish people would like independence from England, The English people would like independence from Scotland. I just hope it does not become bitter because I do believe that both countries can prosper. Even if only to nullify the envy of not having free prescriptions and lower tuition fees.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 479.

    @478 - in which case you can understand how they won a majority victory in a parliament with a voting system designed NEVER to return a majority government.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 478.

    @477 -

    We have found a political party who is going to deliver to English free prescriptions and lower tuition fees, they're called the SNP.

  • rate this
    0

    Comment number 477.

    @476 - "As a Englishman, I would like to have free prescriptions, lower tuition fee's " - quite simple really you just need to find a political party that would rather spend your taxes on what you want rather than attempting to maintain some sort of perceived notion as an international powerhouse spending billions in the global arena on 'wars' that suit others.

 

Comments 5 of 481

 

Features

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.