Rewrite 'yes to development' planning change, say MPs

 
Countryside Campaigners fear government planning reforms put the countryside at risk

Related Stories

MPs are calling on ministers to rewrite a key part of its controversial changes to planning rules in England, removing the default "yes" to development.

Ministers say a simplified planning system is needed to boost growth and encourage sustainable development.

But the Commons communities committee said in a report that the government had slimmed down guidance so much it was now often "unhelpfully vague".

Planning Minister Greg Clark says the MPs support the key changes proposed.

At the heart of the government's planning reforms is a "presumption in favour of sustainable development" which ministers say will boost house building and other economic growth while not harming communities, the environment or the countryside.

Ministers have cut more than 1,000 pages of regulations down to just 52 to overcome planning delays which they claim cost the economy £3bn a year.

But their draft plans provoked angry protests from groups including the National Trust and the Campaign to Protect Rural England, who are concerned that they could lead to a return to urban sprawl and damaging development.

'Confusion'

Now the Commons communities and local government committee has warned that the changes risk becoming "unbalanced" and favouring "unsustainable development".

The MPs highlight the default "yes" in the reforms that gives the go-ahead to development unless the adverse effects "significantly and demonstrably" outweigh the benefits.

"This carries the risk of the planning system being used to implement poorly planned, unsustainable development", the report says.

"The 'default yes' to development and the phrase 'significantly and demonstrably' should be removed from the text."

The MPs welcome a government commitment to take the consultation process seriously and to reinstate a policy to build on brown field sites first.

But the committee's Labour chairman Clive Betts said changes are needed to the so-called National Planning Policy Framework.

"The way the framework is drafted currently gives the impression that greater emphasis should be given in planning decisions to economic growth," he said.

"This undermines the equally important environmental and social elements of the planning system."

The report also warns there is a danger that, far from speeding up the planning process, in the short term the changes would slow it down by introducing "confusion" where previously there was detailed guidance - and warns that "planning by appeal" could be the outcome.

The MPs said ministers had gone too far in cutting back existing planning guidance.

"Critical wording has been lost and what remains is often unhelpfully vague," the report said.

Ministers should produce "a tighter, clearer document, and should not make a fetish of how many pages it is".

The committee also recommends that once the changes are finalised all planning advice is reviewed - item by item - "lest councils spend valuable time reinventing numerous wheels".

Housing shortage

But John Stewart from the Home Builders' Federation says the planning system must change.

"For the last 20 years environmental concerns have been dominant and as a consequence we have a housing shortage," he told the BBC.

"There are roughly a million homes over the last 20 years that should have been built which haven't been.

Start Quote

They say that the core principle, the presumption in favour of sustainable development in their words should be a 'golden thread' running through the planning system”

End Quote Greg Clark Planning minister

"And looking forward we are building about 100,000 homes a year and we should be building well over 250,000, so we have a very serious housing crisis."

Campaigners against the planning overhaul have welcomed the MPs' report.

Fiona Reynolds, director general of the National Trust, said the committee's report provided "irresistible pressure" on ministers to improve their plans.

"Along with nearly 230,000 people who signed our petition against the changes, the select committee has identified the clear changes that need to be made to the draft national planning policy framework so that it delivers a planning system that balances social and environmental needs with those of the economy," she said.

But Minister Mr Clark said the MPs support the key thrust of the government's plans.

"They say that the core principle, the presumption in favour of sustainable development in their words should be a 'golden thread' running through the planning system.

"What they felt is ... there are some ambiguities and have suggested some changes. I have invited them to advise me and so of course I'm going to take their advice very seriously."

The shadow local government secretary Hilary Benn said the report was a "pretty damning criticism" of the government's proposals.

"They are going to have to redraft their plans," he said.

"Local councils have got to be given the opportunity to draw up their new development plans in the light of what the government is proposing and I strongly support what the committee has said about there being a reasonable interval to allow councils to do that so they are not left at the mercy of these new proposals."

 

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination
 
  • rate this
    -1

    Comment number 426.

    There is no housing shortage in the UK. Mortgages have never been cheaper in living memory. There are several large houses for sale in my area, close to the A1 with good rail links. Working single people who want to 'escape' from their parents need to think differently and buy a large house together with their working friends after seeking legal advice.

    Many families do this over and over again

  • rate this
    +6

    Comment number 417.

    The construction industry will lobby as hard as it can to have building regulations relaxed, but has no interest in reducing property prices or tackling the alleged housing shortage. It will continue to provide a trickle of new properties in the South East, as this is where it can make most profit.
    A policy to create jobs in regions other than the South East is the best long term solution.

  • rate this
    +41

    Comment number 263.

    If the government can force purchase of land for railways, roads, etc, then it should force purchase of brownfield land sitting in landbanks of supermarkets/speculators. Instead of tiny terraced houses you can't swing a cat in, it should demand well-designed, spacious, soundproofed flats for people who work in town to cut down commuting. For goodness sake don't build on land we can grow food on!

  • rate this
    +25

    Comment number 262.

    How much is there a real housing shortage, and how much is there a mismatch between where houses are and where jobs are? Rather than build more houses in SE England where infrastructure and the environment are creaking at the seams why not create more jobs where there are vacant houses e.g NE England, Wales and the SW?

    Sadly affordable housing makes less profit than "executive" developments.

  • rate this
    +20

    Comment number 260.

    In my opinion I'd argue that there isn't really a shortage of housing its more a case of no one can afford to buy houses or even rent houses these days. There needs to be structural reform of the housing market itself. No point building more houses if only a few people can afford them.

    Anyway there are plenty of brownfield sites why not use them first.

 

Comments 5 of 16

 

More Politics stories

RSS

Features

Try our new site and tell us what you think. Learn more
Take me there

Copyright © 2015 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.